On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:52:24 +0200, Karl
<8213543ggxnvjx...@kabelmail.de> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>one beginner question:
>
>aList = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]
>bList = [2*i for i in aList]
>sum = 0
>for j in bList:
> sum = sum + bList[j]
>print j
>
>0
>2
>4
>IndexError: 'list index out of range'
>Why is j
On 12 Mar 2014 15:29:59 GMT, Alex van der Spek
wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:00:09 -0500, Zachary Ware wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Alex van der Spek
>> wrote:
=== 8< ===
>Having been taught programming in Algol60 Python still defeats me at times!
>Particularly since Algol60 w
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:51:25 -0700, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Jul 9, 11:42?pm, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jul 9, 11:21 pm, "Jim Langston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> In Python 2.5
>> on intel, the statement
>> > 2**2**2**2**2
>> > evaluates to>>> 2**2**
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:49:06 +0200, Wildemar Wildenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wildemar Wildenburger wrote:
>> x = [1, 2, 3]
>> y = [1, 2, 3]
>> id(x), id(y)
>> x == y
>> x is y
>>
>Ooops!
>
>Make that:
>
>x = [1, 2, 3]
>y = [1, 2, 3]
>id(x); id(y)
>x == y
>x is y
>
>(had to be a semicol
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 21:37:00 -0400, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>"Evan Klitzke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>| On 7/11/07, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| > Just for curiosity: This helps to find the answer to the problem "Which
>is
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:30:16 -0700, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Jul 13, 1:20 pm, Wayne Brehaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:51:25 -0700, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <[EMAIL PRO
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:01:56 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris Carlen a écrit :
>> Hi:
>>
>> From what I've read of OOP, I don't get it. I have also found some
>> articles profoundly critical of OOP. I tend to relate to these articles.
>>
=== 8< ===
>>
>> Hence,
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:51:52 -0400, "Jeff McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>The raw_input built-in returns a string. The '[0]' subscript returns
>the first character in the user supplied response as strings support
>indexing.
>
>[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5341)] on darwin
>Type "hel
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:18:43 +0200, Wildemar Wildenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wayne Brehaut wrote:
>>> (had to be a semicolon there)
>>>
>>
>> Not "had to be" since a discerning reader will note that the two
>> values in
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:37:04 -0400, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Chris Carlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>From what I've read of OOP, I don't get it.
>>
>> For that matter, even using OOP a bit with C++ and Perl, I didn't get it
>
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:18:05 +0530, "Rustom Mody"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 7/14/07, Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> OOP can be abused (particularly with deep or intricate inheritance
>> structures). But the base concept is simple and clear: you can bundle
>> state and behavio
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:49:48 -0600, darren kirby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>quoth the Wayne Brehaut:
>
>> (I started with Royal McBee LGP 30 machine language (hex input) in
>> 1958, and their ACT IV assembler later! Then FORTRAN IV in 1965. By
>> 1967 I too was usin
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:47:20 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Jul 13, 3:20 pm, Wayne Brehaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:01:56 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Chris Carlen a écrit :
>> >
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:27:13 -0700, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Jul 13, 1:20 pm, Wayne Brehaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:51:25 -0700, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:32:03 -0700, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Jul 13, 2:52 pm, Wayne Brehaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:30:16 -0700, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:37:13 -0400, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Wayne Brehaut wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:32:03 -0700, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>[...]
>> But I digress (but only because provoked!)...
>>
>>>> [for purposes of t
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:10:05 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
>(snip)
> > after Bruno made the
>> claim: "OO is about machines - at least as conceveid by Alan Key, who
>> invented the term and most of the concept.&q
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:55:35 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
>> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:01:56 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Carlen a écrit :
>>>> Hi:
>
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:51:31 +0200, "Hendrik van Rooyen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Wayne Brehaut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:37:13 -0400, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:56:18 +0200, Hrvoje Niksic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Christof Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> To get rid of the if statements, replace __init__ function with:
>>
>> def __init__(self, tc):
>> functionToCall = eval("self.testCase%s" % tc)
>
>Or functio
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:13:21 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 2 Pa , 13:39, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> > import string
>>
>> Why import 'string' if you're not using it?
>>
>> > f=open('/test/test.asc','r')
>> > o=open('/test/out.asc','w')
>> > for lin
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:12:04 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>J. Clifford Dyer a écrit :
>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 04:11:07PM -, Grant Edwards wrote
>> regarding Re: Python Magazine: Issue 1 Free!:
>>
>>> On 2007-10-05, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:52:13 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
>> On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:12:04 +0200, Bruno Desthuilliers
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>J. Clifford Dyer a écrit :
>(snip)
Hi Jorge,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:44:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm new to this group so I don't know if this question has been posted
>before, but does anyone knows about linear/integer programming
>routines in Python that are available on the web, more specifically of
>the br
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:00:12 -0800, John DeRosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:23:56 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 00:10 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Nov 6, 12:30 pm, Nicola Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>>
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:23:25 +0200, "Ramon Diaz-Uriarte"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Going back to the original question, a related question: does anybody
>know why there are so few books on data structures and algorithms that
>use Python?
>
>I remember that, at least ~ 12 years ago there were man
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:32:06 +0200, Fredrik Lundh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
>
>> Going back to the original question, a related question: does anybody
>> know why there are so few books on data structures and algorithms that
>> use Python?
>
>Probably because Python has
Hi braver,
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:17:14 -0800 (PST), braver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'd like to check, for a filehandle f, that EOF has been reached on
>it. What's the way to do it? I don't want to try/except on EOF, I
>want to check, after I read a line, that now we're in the EOF state.
I
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:06:15 -0800 (PST), braver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Nov 22, 3:41 am, Wayne Brehaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you have PythonWin 2.5.1 (r251:54863, May 1 2007, 17:47:05) [MSC v.1310
>> 32 bit (Intel)] on win32.for example, using He
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:20:49 -0800 (PST), aassime abdellatif
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'And they devised, and God
>devised, and God devised, and God is the best of divisors.
Obvious, since God is One, and so He divides 1, and 0, and -1, and all
integers both positive and negative (Peace Be Up
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:41:56 +0100, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wayne Brehaut a écrit :
>(snip spam)
>> Obvious, since God is One, and so He divides 1, and 0, and -1, and all
>> integers both positive and negative (Peace Be Upon Them).
>>
>
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:43:38 -0800 (PST), Tom La Bone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Can someone suggest where to get a version of Gnuplot.py (for Windows) that
>has been updated to use numpy? Or, is there another interface available to
>use GnuPlot from Python?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Tom
Gnuplot 1.7 uses
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:34:47 +0100, Andre Engels
wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Mensanator wrote:
>
>>> Tongue in cheek solution:
>>>
>>> import urllib2
>>>
>>> url = 'http://primes.utm.edu/lists/small/1.txt'
>>> primes = []
>>> for line in urllib2.urlopen(url).read().splitlines():
>
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT), Saurabh
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I am trying to move my application on a MVC architecture and plan to
>use Jinja for the same. Can anyone provide me with few quick links
>that might help me to get started with Jinja?
Perhaps the most useful link is:
http://ww
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:37:22 +0200, Christian Heimes
wrote:
>pdpi wrote:
>> On Jul 15, 12:08 am, Christian Heimes wrote:
>>> Chris Rebert wrote:
Using the xor bitwise operator is also an option:
bool(x) ^ bool(y)
>>> I prefer something like:
>>>
>>> bool(a) + bool(b) == 1
>>>
>>> I
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
wrote:
>On Jul 14, 7:25 pm, "Dr. Phillip M. Feldman"
>wrote:
>> Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
>> have an 'xor' operator as well.
>
>Hmm. I don't think 'nice' is sufficient. You'd need to make
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
wrote:
>On Jul 15, 7:29 pm, Wayne Brehaut wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
>> wrote:
>> >I'd also guess that 'xor' would be much less used than 'and' o
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
wrote:
>On Jul 14, 7:25 pm, "Dr. Phillip M. Feldman"
>wrote:
>> Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice to
>> have an 'xor' operator as well.
>
>Hmm. I don't think 'nice' is sufficient. You'd need to make
On 15 Jul 2009 09:11:44 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:25:08 -0700, Dr. Phillip M. Feldman wrote:
>
>> Current Boolean operators are 'and', 'or', and 'not'. It would be nice
>> to have an 'xor' operator as well.
>
>I've often wished there was too, for the sake of completenes
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:26:52 -0400, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 2:59 PM, Baba wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> In below code "the outer loop test in step 4 will execute ( n + 1 )
>> times (note that an extra step is required to terminate the for loop,
>> hence n + 1 and not n executions), which will consume T4( n
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:57:09 -0700 (PDT), Peter
wrote:
>On Sep 28, 12:31 pm, Steven D'Aprano t...@cybersource.com.au> wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:28:34 -0700, Eduardo Ribeiro wrote:
>> > But it doesn't work.
>>
>> What do you mean "doesn't work"?
>>
>> - It crashes the operating system;
>> -
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:45:44 -0400, Andreas Waldenburger
wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:48:06 +0200 Marco Gallotta
> wrote:
>
>> Since these are kids, we feel the nice changes in 3 such as removing
>> integer division will help in teaching. It will also remove confusion
>> when they go to downloa
42 matches
Mail list logo
