On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:06:03 AM UTC+5:30, Seymore4Head wrote:
> Now I am trying to add a dictionary, but it is broke too.
>
> How do I fix:
> class RPS:
> key={0:"rock", 1:"paper",2:"scissors"};
> def __init__(self):
> self.throw=random.randrange(3)
> self.key=key[s
On Sunday, November 23, 2014 12:00:15 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Rick should ask himself why virtually every single language, from compiled
> languages like Ada, C, Pascal and Java, to interpreted languages like bash,
> all use search paths instead of explicit paths.
>
> Hint: the answe
On Sunday, November 23, 2014 8:28:16 PM UTC+5:30, Ivan Evstegneev wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I would like to ask you for some explanations on comprehensions. (Don't be
> scared, it just some particular example ^_^)
>
> I found this little "find prime number" example over the internet:
>
> >>>
On Sunday, November 23, 2014 9:27:22 PM UTC+5:30, Roy Smith wrote:
> Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> > > But it breaks all the picture that I've built in my head about comps till
> > > now...
> >
> > Note that list comprehensions are little more than syntactic sugar for for
> > loops. If you're having
On Sunday, November 23, 2014 10:20:05 PM UTC+5:30, Seymore4Head wrote:
> Like I have said, most of the stuff I am doing is still trial and
> error. Having to specify RPS to use it inside the class seemed wrong
> to me.
Yes that is natural.
Python is a bit odd in the OO-world in that it prioritize
On Sunday, November 23, 2014 10:15:51 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> 1. I find comprehensions are harder than for-loops --
Heh! Meant to say 'easier' of course...
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Monday, November 24, 2014 10:13:04 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 08:45:39 -0800, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > First a one-line solution in haskell
> >
> > sieve (p:xs) =p:sieve [x | x <- xs, x `mod` p /= 0]
>
> Don't use tha
On Monday, November 24, 2014 10:38:52 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Rick Johnson :
>
> > FINDERS KEEPERS; LOSERS WEEPERS!
> >
> > Contrary to your naive interpretation of history, the native
> > Americans [...]
>
> Was this rant at least produced by a Python generator?
>
> Where's the Sto
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 10:08:28 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3Fvg-sCYAAkLSV.jpg
:-)
I will use this in a class.
Now to hunt a cartoon for the opposite -- static/rigorous typing
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Friday, November 28, 2014 6:57:23 AM UTC+5:30, Seymore4Head wrote:
> def __str__(self):
> s = "Hand contains "
> for x in self.hand:
> s = s + str(x) + " "
> return s
>
> This is part of a Hand class. I need a hand for the dealer and a hand
> for the player.
On Friday, November 28, 2014 7:51:40 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Friday, November 28, 2014 6:57:23 AM UTC+5:30, Seymore4Head wrote:
> > def __str__(self):
> > s = "Hand contains "
> > for x in self.hand:
> > s =
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 5:28:49 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
> memilanuk writes:
>
> > What I'm having trouble finding a concrete answer to is the difference
> > between:
>
> (Note that where you write “some_func” the syntax requires an
> expression, not a function. I've changed your examp
On Friday, December 5, 2014 4:13:27 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> But most of all, I despise the menus that pop up covering what I am trying
> to read the page just because I happened to move the mouse over a button. I
> loathe the practice of stuffing content into menus instead of using li
On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 2:37:59 PM UTC+5:30, Peter Otten wrote:
> Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > On Friday, December 5, 2014 4:13:27 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> But most of all, I despise the menus that pop up covering what I am
> >> trying to read
On Monday, December 8, 2014 3:52:53 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 12/7/2014 10:28 AM, Ivan Evstegneev wrote:
> > Hi Shiyao,
> >
> > Now I see, that it was kind of dumb question...
> >
> > x = ([1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6])
> > L = []
> [L.extend(i) for i in x]
> > [None, None, None]
>
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:38:18 AM UTC+5:30, rand...@fastmail.us wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014, at 16:18, Duncan Booth wrote:
> > The default parameters are actually evaluated when the 'def' statement is
> > executed and the function object is created from the default arguments
> > and
> >
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 12:09:10 AM UTC+5:30, rand...@fastmail.us wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014, at 21:44, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Nice example -- thanks.
> > Elaborates the why of this gotcha -- a def(inition) is imperative.
> > From a semantic pov very clean.
> &
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:05:13 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > But I have a different question -- can this be demonstrated without the
> > 'is'?
> > Because to me 'is' -- equiv
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 8:45:22 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:18:44 -0800, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
>
> > And going the other way -- no defs only lambdas its this:
> >
> >
> >>>> f = lambda : (lambda x= {}:
I remember seeing here (couple of weeks ago??) a mention of a regex
debugging/editing tool hidden away in the python source tree.
Does someone remember the name/path?
There are of course dozens of online ones...
Looking for a python native tool
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On Saturday, December 20, 2014 12:01:10 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> I remember seeing here (couple of weeks ago??) a mention of a regex
> debugging/editing tool hidden away in the python source tree.
>
> Does someone remember the name/path?
>
> There are of course doz
On Saturday, December 20, 2014 6:27:19 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Taken from Ben Kurtovic's blog:
>
> http://benkurtovic.com/2014/06/01/obfuscating-hello-world.html
>
>
>
> (lambda _, __, ___, , _, __, ___, :
> getattr(
> __import__(True.__class__.
On Monday, December 22, 2014 4:21:13 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> Awww, did da widdle puddy tat get up on the wrong side of the bed this
> morning? :-)
>
>
> Obviously you don't write obfuscated code like this for production use,
> except in such cases where you deliberately want to w
On Monday, December 22, 2014 7:55:50 AM UTC+5:30, ryguy7272 wrote:
> Sorry, but that's what drives me nuts. I install a few packages, and the
> messages that I get says the package is installed...then it says it's NOT
> installed...I don't know what to think...
Its nice to bang the head agains
On Saturday, December 20, 2014 7:30:20 AM UTC+5:30, Khetam Yassen wrote:
> Hello all
> I Have problem about , How i can compute accuracy to unigram,bigram and
> trigram
> and how i can change the size to iteration separate from 1 to 10 in each
> stage from iteration train take 90% and training 10
On Monday, December 22, 2014 6:52:12 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> > def init_thread(opt):
> >opt['result'] = Queue.Queue()
> >thread = pause.Thread(opt)
> >thread.start()
> >return thread
> >
> > threads = [init_thread(opt
On Monday, December 22, 2014 8:37:50 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > If you consider side-effecting comprehensions as kosher,
> > then a next conclusion is naturally going to be that
> > multiple generator compreh
On Monday, December 22, 2014 3:04:52 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>
> > Steve Hayes wrote:
> >> But what if I had run it and it reformatted my hard disk?
> >>
> >> How would I have known that it would or wouldn't do that?
> >
> > That's why I didn't run it myself :-)
>
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:50:22 PM UTC+5:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> And even _with_ all the technical jibber-jabber, none of it explained
> or justified the whole "writing a virus to infect the brain through
> the optic nerve" thing which might just have well been magick and
> witches.
Yo
On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 6:30:30 PM UTC+5:30, shawool wrote:
> Thank you for answering my query.
>
> Fonts and colors are reset to defaults now. Sorry for the inconvenience
> caused.
>
> Regards,
> Shawool
Sorry for the peevishness
Are you using gmail?
If so when you compose a message
The
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014 8:53:54 PM UTC+5:30, shawool wrote:
> I was unable to find an option to disable HTML mode.
> Thanks for letting me know how to enable plain text mode.
> I just followed the steps and hopefully this message is in plain text format.
Your headers show
Content-Type: t
On Wednesday, December 24, 2014 8:42:32 PM UTC+5:30, Vito De Tullio wrote:
> Seb wrote:
>
> def n_grams(a, n):
> > ... z = (islice(a, i, None) for i in range(n))
> > ... return zip(*z)
> > ...
> >
> > I'm impressed at how succinctly this islice helps to build a list of
> > tuples wit
On Friday, January 2, 2015 10:45:17 PM UTC+5:30, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Friday, January 2, 2015 8:01:50 AM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > I'm not sure that I'd want to. Handling case insensitivity is fine
> > when you're restricting everything to ASCII, but it's rather harder
> > when you allow
On Sunday, January 4, 2015 8:45:08 AM UTC+5:30, thomas hahn wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Help with finding tutors
> for Python, Linux, R, Perl, Octave, MATLAB and/or Cytoscape for yeast
> microarray
> analysis, next generation sequencing and constructing gene interaction
> networks
Hi Thomas
This is a
Given a matrix I want to shift the 1st column 0 (ie leave as is)
2nd by one place, 3rd by 2 places etc.
This code works.
But I wonder if numpy can do it shorter and simpler.
-
def transpose(mat):
return([[l[i] for l in mat]for i in range(0,len(mat[0]))])
def rotate(mat):
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 12:58:52 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Given a matrix I want to shift the 1st column 0 (ie leave as is)
> > 2nd by one place, 3rd by 2 places etc.
> >
> > This code works.
> > But I
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:43:45 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 12:58:52 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > > Given a matrix I want to shift the 1st column 0 (ie leave as is)
> > >
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:42:18 AM UTC+5:30, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> > Is there a good tutorial to learn about pip?
>
> I'll answer what I think is the correct question: where to learn about
> the current best Python packaging practices.
In order to attain to full I
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 7:07:26 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > With that I came up with the expression
> >
> > transpose(array([list(roll(mat[:,i],i,0)) for i in range(mat.shape[1])]))
> >
> > Not exactly
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 4:26:58 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have come across this in the past, but today it annoyed me enough that I'm
> asking for an explanation.
>
> Posts on this newsgroup/mailing list are archived on the web, but the URLs
> seem to change, which leaves dead l
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 7:46:42 PM UTC+5:30, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> Theres a new app/service that should solve your problem:
>
> Its from google... and called groups
> It solves one problem (moving archive
On Friday, January 9, 2015 at 10:27:53 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 3:52 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Is it?
> > Ok lets test that.
> > This is posted from google-groups.
> > After posting I shall remove it
>
> Remove it from GG, mayb
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 8:02:50 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Rick Johnson wrote:
>
>
> >
> > EXAMPLE 1: "Reducing Comprehension"
> > https://docs.python.org/2/howto/doanddont.html#using-the-batteries
> >
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 10:56:11 AM UTC+5:30, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > At the point you are demonstrating reduce(), if the reader doesn't
> > understand or can't guess the meaning of "n = 4", "n+1" or range(), they
> > won't unders
On Sunday, January 11, 2015 at 10:49:11 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > The last post by RR helping someone with a tk problem was very helpful,
> > and rather elucidating, as are most of his post on tk. ...
> > Now perhaps there are
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 10:06:50 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:48:18 +, Ian wrote:
>
> > My recommendation would be to write a recursive decent parser for your
> > files.
> >
> > That way will be easier to write,
>
> I know that writing parsers is a sol
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015 at 10:06:50 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 19:48:18 +, Ian wrote:
>
> > My recommendation would be to write a recursive decent parser for your
> > files.
> >
> > That way will be easier to write,
>
> I know that writing parsers is a sol
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 11:25:11 AM UTC+5:30, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First off, to each reader--if you believe that 'multi-line' lambdas are
> no good and we can just use functions, decorators, &c. to accomplish
> everything in Python, advance warning: this post will annoy you.
>
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 7:48:20 AM UTC+5:30, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 12:19:31 PM UTC-5, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > [...]
> > Looked at your suggestions...
> > And then got distracted by your other project
> > https://git
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 8:33:14 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 16/01/2015 02:48, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >
> > The more forks the merrier!
> >
>
> When counting them, or more specifically handles, thou shalt not stop
> counting at three, but thou sh
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 9:46:30 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Rustom Mody wrote:
>
> > Let there be a hundred different versions, then people will
> > begin to clamor against the non-necessity of the penury-of-ASCII:
> >
> > http://blo
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 7:20:13 AM UTC+5:30, Andrew Robinson wrote:
Disclaimers
1. Ive not really read the above 542 lines and earlier
2. I am not a fan of OOP
Still some thoughts...
Electrical engineering (EE) and computer science (CS) may seem related
but are quite different disciplin
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 8:34:20 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Scenario: You're introducing someone to Python for the first time.
> S/he may have some previous programming experience, or may be new to
> the whole idea of giving a computer instructions. You have a couple of
> minutes to
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 10:51:52 PM UTC+5:30, Mirage Web Studio wrote:
> On 01/16/2015 08:33 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Scenario: You're introducing someone to Python for the first time.
> > S/he may have some previous programming experience, or may be new to
> > the whole idea of giving
On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 11:26:46 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Tim wrote:
> > I want to get a union of all the values that any 'things' key may have,
> > even in a nested dictionary (and I do not know beforehand how deep the
> > nesting might go):
>
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:02:01 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Mahendra Prajapati wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm facing this problem with python class, while practising the python
> > programming language.It creates an attribute error. I use windows 7 OS. i
> > don't why.I just need to
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 5:52:54 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Luke Tomaneng wrote:
> > Has anyone noticed these? There have been about three of them recently and
> > they don't seem to have anything to do with Python at all. Does anyone know
> > i
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 11:38:27 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/19/2015 5:06 PM, Zachary Gilmartin wrote:
> > Why aren't there trees in the python standard library?
>
> Sequences nested withing sequences can be regarded as trees, and Python
> has these. I regard Lisp as a tree pr
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 7:03:56 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 11:38:27 AM UTC+5:30, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > On 1/19/2015 5:06 PM, Zachary Gilmartin wrote:
> > > Why aren't there trees in the python standard library?
> >
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 7:46:02 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Rustom Mody :
>
> > Yeah python has trees alright.
>
> Does Python balance them for you?
No
Does python support a menagerie of lists like C
- singly linked, doubly linked, with header, without head
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 10:51:13 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > from enum import Enum
> > class TreeTag(Enum):
> > I = 0 # An internal node
> > L = 1 # A leaf node
> > def __repr__(s
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 11:46:11 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 10:51:13 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > > # Converting to generators is trivial
> > > =
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 3:18:03 AM UTC+5:30, Mario wrote:
> rustompmody says...
> >
> > Yeah python has trees alright.
> >
> > Heres' some simple tree-code
>
> Didn't you just demonstrate that Python has no trees and instead you
> have to implement them yourself (or use a third-party
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:19:39 AM UTC+5:30, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
> > ## The depth first algorithm
> > dfs (L x) = [x]
> > dfs (B x lst rst) = [x] ++ dfs lst ++ dfs rst
>
> Cute. I can't resist posting the similar breadth first
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 1:27:39 PM UTC+5:30, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Terry Reedy :
>
>
>
> > Others have answered as to why other special-purpose
>
> > constrained-structure trees have not been added to the stdlib.
>
>
>
> O
On Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 6:06:06 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > I would like a set to be {1,2,3} or at worst ⦃1,2,3⦄
> > and a bag to be ⟅1,2,3⟆
> >
> > Apart from the unicode niceness that
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 3:57:50 AM UTC+5:30, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
> > Thats not bfs. That's inorder traversal
>
> Oops, you're right. How's this:
>
> bfs x = go [x] where
> go [] = []
> go (L x:ts) = x:go ts
>
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 4:25:03 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > The Haskell is bullseye¹ in capturing the essense of a tree because
> > conceptually a tree of type t is recursive in the sense that it can contain
> > 2
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 12:46:22 PM UTC+5:30, Paul Rubin wrote:
> Ian Kelly writes:
> > How do you create a tree containing an even number of elements under
> > this constraint?
>
> That's a good point, I've usually seen different definitions of trees,
> e.g.
>
>data Tree a = Leaf |
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 2:55:38 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> Meanwhile, there's the strange decision to implement type hints for
> >> local variables # comment lines. I have an hard time wrapping my head
> >> around this one. Really,
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 3:50:38 AM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> >> I've been lightly scanning and following the PEP 484 discussion, and one
> >> point I don't think I've seen mention
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 6:45:39 AM UTC+5:30, Rick Johnson wrote:
> Note: This is the closest you're going to get to a PEP from me!
>
> Okay, i have found a solution to the type hinting problem
> that will appease both sides. On one side we have those who
> are proposing type hinting anno
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 9:23:11 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > 1. [1,2,3] + [4,5,6]
> > uses the same symbol for an unrelated operation
> > 1 + 4
>
> They're not unrelated operations. Maybe in the
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 5:18:32 PM UTC+5:30, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 09:05 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> >> Can you name any other language that *does* allow subclassing of
> >> booleans or creation of new boolean values?
>
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 10:22:06 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Can you tell me what of the following code does not satisfy your
> > requirements?
> > [Needs python 3.4]
> >
> >
> >>>>
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 10:22:06 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Can you tell me what of the following code does not satisfy your
> > requirements?
> > [Needs python 3.4]
> >
> >
> >>>>
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 10:54:06 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > The only workaround I have been able to come up with is:
> >
> > class B4(IntEnum):
> >> F1 = 0
> >> F2 = &
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 11:07:48 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Strikes me that making enumerations is-equal rather than just
> > =-equal is a bit heavy-handed and unnecessary
> > What do you think?
&g
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 11:35:49 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 10:22:06 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >> > Can you tell me w
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 11:35:49 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 10:22:06 PM UTC+5:30, Ian wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> >> > Can you tell
On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 10:43:30 PM UTC+5:30, Automn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am programming a "Secret of Mana" (Seiken Densetsu) game in kivy, it runs
> on a phone with kivy launcher.
>
> Features for now are : movement by swiping, polygon collision and image state
> changes with resource
On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 9:36:56 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 10:43:30 PM UTC+5:30, Automn wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am programming a "Secret of Mana" (Seiken Densetsu) game in kivy, it runs
> > on a phone with
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 12:15:28 AM UTC+5:30, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2015-01-25 04:31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Of course we don't have $1/3 dollar coins, but I do have a pair of
> > tin-snips and can easily cut a $1 coin into three equal pieces.
>
> I'm impressed that you can use tin-snip
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 at 5:36:02 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote:
> One thing that I really like doing with my Python students (full
> disclosure: I'm a mentor with www.thinkful.com and am thus at times
> paid to help people learn Python) is some form of screen-sharing, so I
> can watch hi
On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 2:21:34 AM UTC+5:30, Ian Foote wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I think a very idiomatic way to implement backtracking is using a
> recursive generator (python 3):
>
> def backtrack_solver(data=None):
> if data is None:
>
On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 12:52:04 PM UTC+5:30, Jussi Piitulainen wrote:
> Rustom Mody writes:
>
> > To add to Ian:
> >
> > The classic way of doing it in a functional framework is called:
> > "Replace failure by list of successes"
> >
&
On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 6:45:41 PM UTC+5:30, Neal Becker wrote:
> Is there a more elegant way to spell this?
>
> for x in [_ for _ in seq if some_predicate]:
Depends on what follows the ':'
In the trivial case all thats outside the comprehension can be dropped:
>>> [x for x in [y for y
Following some posts here I thought I'd try python on android via kivy.
Followed the tutorials -- involved a couple of GBs(!!) of downloads
using something called buildozer
Finally got a hello world running on a phone -- Yay!
Now when I try to go from hello world to something a more (kivy-exampl
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 1:42:47 AM UTC+5:30, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
> This is a follow up from a previous discussion in which it is argued
> that the following code produces the correct error message terminology,
> considering that in Python an object is also an instance.
>
> >>>
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 7:55:12 AM UTC+5:30, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 1/27/15 7:17 PM, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
> > Ned Batchelder says...
> >>
> >> A common mistake is to believe that "OOP" is a well-defined term. It's
> >> not it's a collection of ideas that are expressed slightly dif
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 10:18:07 AM UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
> On 28/01/2015 10:24 AM, Mario Figueiredo wrote:
> > In other words, the object know as "Sub class" is not an instance
> > object. True, it is an instance of the object 'type'.
>
> >>> class Foo:
> ... pass
>
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 10:55:32 AM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Python itself has answers to your questions:
>
>>>> isinstance(3, int)
>True
>>>> isinstance("3", int)
>False
>>>> isinstance(int, type)
>True
>>>> isinstance(type, int)
>False
>>>>
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 11:31:46 AM UTC+5:30, random wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, at 00:43, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:37 PM, random832 wrote:
> > > Sub itself is not a Sub object, it is a type object. "instance" is
> > > implicit in the phrase "foo object".
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 at 10:39:34 PM UTC+5:30, rand...@fastmail.us
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015, at 01:59, Ben Finney wrote:
> > You have no justification to claim that, and it's hostile and dismissive
> > to claim it so assertively.
>
> Sorry about that - I was tired and had just read
On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 4:09:19 AM UTC+5:30, beli...@aol.com wrote:
> On Thursday, January 29, 2015 at 10:01:00 AM UTC-5, Liu Zhenhai wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am not sure here is the right place to ask this question, but I want to
> > give it a shot:)
> > are there fortran libs providing python
On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 7:52:58 AM UTC+5:30, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:38:20 +0100, franssoa
> declaimed the following:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >(please excuse my english as is not my primary language)
> >
> >- I own a webcam that take a picture of outside of my house once
On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 1:03:03 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 30.01.15 um 02:40 schrieb Rustom Mody:
> > FORTRAN
> >
> > use dictionary
> > type(dictionary), pointer :: d
> > d=>dict_new()
> > call set(d//'toto',1)
&g
On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 10:39:12 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 09:27 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > ... if I restate that in other words it says that sufficiently
> > complex data structures will be beyond the reach of the standard
> > RAII infras
On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 11:01:50 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Friday, January 30, 2015 at 10:39:12 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > On 01/30/2015 09:27 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > > ... if I restate that in other words it says that sufficiently
> > &
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 5:52:58 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Esthetically, I'm most impressed with Scheme. One day it might give
> Python a run for its money.
>
>
> Marko
Aren't you getting this backwards?
http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/link/2110/why-mit-switched-from-scheme-to
701 - 800 of 1750 matches
Mail list logo
