On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 6:45:41 PM UTC+5:30, Neal Becker wrote: > Is there a more elegant way to spell this? > > for x in [_ for _ in seq if some_predicate]:
Depends on what follows the ':' In the trivial case all thats outside the comprehension can be dropped: >>> [x for x in [y for y in range(10) if y % 2 == 0]] [0, 2, 4, 6, 8] >>> [y for y in range(10) if y % 2 == 0] [0, 2, 4, 6, 8] >>> Or >>> [x*x for x in [y for y in range(10) if y % 2 == 0]] [0, 4, 16, 36, 64] >>> [y*y for y in range(10) if y % 2 == 0] [0, 4, 16, 36, 64] >>> > > > -- > -- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it Ha! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
