2018-02-05 9:14 GMT+01:00 Ian Kelly :
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>> 2. Is there a better way to do what I want?
>
> The dict.items() view is explicitly set-like and can be unioned, so
> you can do this:
>
> py> dict(d1.items() | d2.items())
>
> As to the question of wh
2016-10-29 21:38 GMT+02:00 :
>
> Code:
>
> [...]
>
> for i in range (len(protein) & len(seq1)) :
>
> if protein[i] != mutantPRO[i] :
>print (protein[i] + str(i) + mutantPRO[i])
>A+= 1
> else:
> if seq1[i:i+3] != mutant[i:i+3]:
>
2016-06-10 10:37 GMT+02:00 Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>:
>
> Nagy László Zsolt wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure wich one is the best. Peter wrote that UserList was left in
> > collections only for backward compatiblity. This might be a point
>
> I'll take that back. I looked around and found no evidence
Hello,
You may want to read PEP 418 which nicely summaries the different clock
available on each platform and their limitations.
It looks like CLOCK_BOOTTIME is what you want but it is only available on
Linux.
Regards,
Maxime.
Le mer. 6 nov. 2019 à 18:23, R.Wieser a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
>
Hi,
Le ven. 17 janv. 2020 à 20:11, Frank Millman a écrit :
> It works perfectly. However, some pdf's can be large, and there could be
> concurrent requests, so I wanted to minimise the memory footprint. So I
> tried passing the client_writer directly to the handler -
>
> await pdf_handler(
Hi,
You can use the trace module for that:
https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/trace.html
Personally I tend to put print statement at strategic places instead, I
find that easier to analyse than a full trace but YMMV.
Maxime
Le dim. 25 oct. 2020 à 01:25, Steve a écrit :
> This would seriousl
2016-01-28 17:53 GMT+01:00 Ian Kelly :
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Frank Millman wrote:
>
> > The caller requests some data from the database like this.
> >
> >return_queue = asyncio.Queue()
> >sql = 'SELECT ...'
> >request_queue.put((return_queue, sql))
>
> Note that since thi
2016-01-30 11:51 GMT+01:00 Frank Millman :
> "Chris Angelico" wrote in message
> news:CAPTjJmoAmVNTCKq7QYaDRNQ67Gcg9TxSXYXCrY==s9djjna...@mail.gmail.com...
>
>
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Frank Millman
>> wrote:
>> > We had a recent discussion about the best way to do this, and ChrisA
>>
2015-01-12 22:19 GMT+01:00 :
>
> https://bpaste.net/show/93be9e15634b <--- Line 19 through 22
>
> At all times, my program is assigning the object priority of 0, even if
one already exists in the database with a priority of 0 (it's supposed to
be assigning it a priority of 1 in those cases).
>
> I'
Le lun. 27 avr. 2015 à 04:39, Makoto Kuwata a écrit :
>
> If function decorator notation could take arguments,
> decorator definition would be more simple:
>
> def multiply(func, n):
> def newfunc(*args, **kwargs):
> return n * func(*args, **kwargs)
> return newfunc
>
> @multiply
10 matches
Mail list logo