E_WAIT state and they are preventing you from
binding to the address again in the second run of your app. Setting the
SO_REUSEADDR flag on POSIX fixes this problem (don't set it on Windows,
though).
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
appear to have been necessary.
Is there a way to solve this in a more beautiful way? Am I missing
something here?
Hope this helps,
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:02:57 -0800 (PST), koranthala
wrote:
On Jan 27, 9:27 pm, koranthala wrote:
On Jan 27, 6:57 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
[snip]
Thank you Jean-Paul.
My code is more complex than what I have mentioned. When I mentioned
msg.send, the msg object actually gets the
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:30:32 -0800 (PST), koranthala
wrote:
On Jan 28, 7:10 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:02:57 -0800 (PST), koranthala
wrote:
>On Jan 27, 9:27 pm, koranthala wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 6:57 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> [snip]
>> T
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:05:13 -0800 (PST), koranthala
wrote:
On Jan 28, 8:36 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
[snip]
Why isn't the return value of protocol.send propagated back to msg.send?
It sounds like it should be.
Jean-Paul
Thank you very much again Jean-Paul for helping me out.
any ideas what might be going on or how to debug this?
strace is nice. It sounds like some blocking network operation. rdns can
often cause things like this. If you're lucky, strace will point right at
the problem.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
't use os.system here anyway
since the poster is interested in getting the contents of the page at the
URL.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gh-level behavior you're after (I know that a bunch of people
have used it to communicate with Flash, for example).
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
u want to learn more about threads on Linux, you should check out
the NPTL documentation. It is a much more reliable authority than any
Python documentation regarding the nature of threads on Linux.
Hope this helps,
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
code. It is
a handy supplement to your project's test suite.
Read more about Pyflakes and the 0.3.0 release on the website:
http://divmod.org/trac/wiki/DivmodPyflakes
Jean-Paul Calderone
Divmod, Inc.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:33:53 -0800 (PST), Alejandro
wrote:
On Jan 30, 9:11 am, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
[clarification about threads]
Thank you for the clarification. I will reformulate my question:
pstree and also ntop (but not top) show a number for each thread, like
for instance
Note the "space" which shouldn't be here---^
The space is irrelevant.
>>> object. __init__
>>> object.__init__ is object. __init__
True
>>>
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
er, so im
gonna roll my own using the sockets module.
For what it's worth, that FAQ entry was grossly out of date. I just
deleted it and replaced it with an entry which says the exact opposite.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ere are a bunch of tools for this. I use trial (part of Twisted), which
will collect your tests, run them, and report the results (and has helpers
for debugging, profiling, and some other stuff) and buildbot.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I bet this won't work. It needs to be a "real" file - have a file
descriptor or a handle or something.
Instead, try opening os.devnull.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
listenTCP(12345, factory)
reactor.run()
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
u might also want to consider using a higher level socket library than
the "socket" module. The socket module exposes you to lots of very low
level details and platform-specific idiosyncrasies. You may find that a
library like Twisted (<http://twistedmatrix.com/>) will let you write
programs with fewer bugs.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
at can be avoided by using non-
blocking operations instead.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
(Child,self).__init__(filePath)
TypeError: super() argument 1 must be type, not classobj"
What have I done wrong? Thanks in advance for any help.
Consider whether you really need to use super().
http://fuhm.net/super-harmful/
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:18:34 -0800 (PST), Lionel wrote:
On Feb 9, 4:04 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:20:05 -0800 (PST), Lionel wrote:
>Hello. I've been scouring the web looking for something to clear up a
>little confusion about the use of "super()&qu
e
tons of responses from python-dev team members, including Guido
Yes. Why the knee-jerk reaction? I simply pointed out a resource which
might be helpful to someone trying to learn to use super.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
how this thing got so much out of
control. If anyone starts an intelligent question or remark about
super, this essay is thrown in no matter what. Anyone can explain why?
You're seriously overreacting.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:40:56 + (UTC), Benjamin Peterson
wrote:
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch gmx.net> writes:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:02:43 +, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Jean-Paul Calderone divmod.com> writes:
>> Consider whether you really need to use super
o
control the process before the chroot happens, breaking out is even simpler
in your case (just open / before you chroot in the first place). forking
before doing the chroot may still be a good idea, but it's not the only
solution.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
in a miserable state, so you probably shouldn't use it. That
leaves you with threads.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
= func(*args)
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.5/lib/
python2.5/urllib2.py", line 506, in http_error_default
raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp)
urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 401: Unauthorized ( The server requires
authorization to fulfill the request. Access to the Web server is
denied. Contact the server administrator. )
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
is not updated. If you want to keep
using threads, then you need a way to avoid joining the threads until
you know they're done.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
send = os.fdopen(server_send,"w")
OSError: [Errno 22] Invalid argument
really confused about why this isn't working - running on Linux with
python 2.5.2
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ludes FTP and SFTP support.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
x27;)
>>> type(b'')
>>> from __future__ import unicode_literals
>>> type('')
>>> type(u'')
>>> type(b'')
>>>
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
fore I have to use absolute paths to
import it and this works only, when I run rpgDirectory.py. When I use
pychecker, it can't import this module and fails. Any suggestions, how
can I avoid this and what structure should I use?
http://jcalderone.livejournal.com/39794.html
Jean-P
lp", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import re
>>> print re.compile(r'\s').search(u'a\xa0b')
None
>>> print re.compile(r'\s', re.U).search(u'a\xa0b')
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0xb7dbb3a0>
>>>
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
f.read()
>>> d=f.read()
>>> d=f.read()
Did you think about what this does?
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
avior would be a
good default:
re.match(r'\d', u'\u0660', re.UNICODE)
<_sre.SRE_Match object at 0xb7da0250>
What digit is \u0660, out of 0-9? Hard to say.
Why's it hard? int(u'\u0660') == 0 :)
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Python code? Or is
there some cleaner way to do this?
How about simple bounds checking? An integer fits in an unsigned 32bit
representation if it is greater than or equal to 0 and less than 2 ** 32.
The bounds for the sizes are similarly simple to determine and check.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
sn't portable on Windows. I'm hoping the core python library has
a library for this. Note that I'll be using Python 3.0.
Module urllib2
There isn't such a module in Python 3.0.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
('Second line.', file=output)
Maybe a combination of this and functools.partial as was suggested before. At
least the necessary edits would be at the top of the program.
See http://bugs.python.org/issue4618, there's a comment with a workaround
for this problem.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
string interpolation as in the code you
included in your original post (or in some of the other responses you
received).
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
n TOC
implementation to suggest?
You need an OSCAR-based AIM library. AOL discontinued TOC support several
years ago. No TOC-based client can work on the AIM network.
Twisted includes a (somewhat crufty) OSCAR implementation. There are
probably also other Python OSCAR implementations.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
nd I was wondering whether python provides it straight up.
If you'd like to help out with the new Twisted HTTP client, that would be
wonderful. Even if you can just try it out and report any problems you run
into, that would be immensely helpful.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:47:41 -0800 (PST), Kottiyath
wrote:
If you'd like to help out with the new Twisted HTTP client, that would be
wonderful. Even if you can just try it out and report any problems you run
into, that would be immensely helpful.
Jean-Paul
I would love to help out
st = dir()
for el in lst:
print el + '\t' + str(eval('type(%s)'%el))
It works, now I am curious if there is a better way.
What about this:
for name, obj in vars().iteritems():
print name, obj
Christian
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
. recv(n) does not necessarily
return an n-length string. Read the socket documentation more carefully
and try fixing those issues. Or try using Twisted which presents a
somewhat easier API to use.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ce) - using
the __repr__ of the contained objects makes it easier for the human to
understand what's in the dict. Using __str__ would make it much harder
in many cases.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
want to examine the
structure of the messages you retrieve.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
7;ing of Python 3 code?
Perhaps it will, someday, but I suspect it will provide a JIT for Python 2
long before.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
) having new threads.
There is blocking code - but just in one place. For example,
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/trunk/twisted/internet/selectreactor.py#L93
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
t, merge the results, and treat them all as writeable.
Or use a higher-level library that deals with all the asinine details for
you. ;)
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>>
And no, putting parenthesis around the expression given to exec doesn't make
a difference:
>>> x = exec("foo")
File "", line 1
x = exec("foo")
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
>>>
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
king or not. In
an event-loop, blocking is generally not allowed.
If you're careful, it's possible to avoid blocking, even when using a
blocking socket, at least for AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM sockets. Of course,
it's easier to avoid blocking by using a non-blocking socket.
Jean-Pa
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:55:51 -0500, Jean-Paul Calderone
wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:41:17 -0600, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2008-12-30, Francesco Bochicchio wrote:
3. AFAIK (sorry, I feel acronym-ly today ;), there is no difference in
select between blocking and non-blocking mode. The
he sender passed to one call of send (until the sender starts to
pass really huge strings to send, then it'll get split up) just because
the network has lots of capacity compared to the traffic you're putting
on it. However, even on a LAN it's not guaranteed, and on the internet,
it's extremely likely that this won't happen most of the time.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
an RPython to JavaScript compiler. RPython and Python are
different languages.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
compared
to creating and destroying threads all the time.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
d what was wrong with your `Data` class, so I won't
bother going into that.
I will recommend that you take a look at Deferred and perhaps use it, rather
than implementing something yourself:
http://twistedmatrix.com/projects/core/documentation/howto/defer.html
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.pyt
he `DeferredList´
to only fire after all of the wrapped deferreds have fired, don't pass
this flag.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ywhere, nor any way to specify any
extra flags.
Oring PROTOCOL_SSLv3 together with PROTOCOL_TLSv1 is almost certainly
not the right approach, anyway (as you saw with your tests).
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
enchmark
above demonstrates throughput, not minimum (or maximum, or average,
or any other statistic) response latency, which is what the OP was
really asking about.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:10:44 +1000, James Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Indeed, this looks wrong - or at least inconclusive. The benchmark
above demonstrates throughput, not minimum (or maximum, or
fixed in 2.6, since both of
these warnings are errors in 2.6. ;)
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
mode. (I was
trying to put the file object in non-blocking mode to test next()'s
behavior). ??Ideas?
Take a look at
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/browser/trunk/twisted/internet/fdesc.py
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
rom epsilon.extime import Time
>>> Time.fromISO8601TimeAndDate("2008-10-08T14:05:16.029246+00:00") -
Time.fromISO8601TimeAndDate("2007-03-27T08:54:43+08:00")
datetime.timedelta(561, 47433, 29246)
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
of them. If you want to send something to all clients listening on
that address, then that's the address to pass to transport.write.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ier than writing that big function:
try: open(u'\N{WHITE SMILING FACE}')
... except IOError, e: print str(e).decode('unicode-escape')
...
[Errno 2] No such file or directory: u'☺'
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ing a random new attribute to arbitrary objects any time they happen
to end up in a for loop would be catastrophically terrible. Consider
the enumerate builtin, instead.
for i, e in enumerate('abcd'):
... print i, e
...
0 a
1 b
2 c
3 d
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
things to stdout (or elsewhere) in Python 2.5, making the
Python 3.x change largely a non-feature. ;)
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
thon has to look up to
satisfy some other operation, such as len or +, to be a special method
and don't rely on _either_ it being looked up on the instance or it _not_
being looked up on the instance (ie, don't put a method there and expect it
not to be called). The methods which are actually considered special by
CPython can change and has in the past.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
;, 'b': 1232}
Try printing b before you put it into the Queue.
The Queue isn't doing anything to the objects you pass through it,
you're just surprised at how repr() is presenting the un-altered
data.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
meaningfully use mmap to speed up your application. The data has
to be uncompressed and interpreted before you can get the application data.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e thing that
you want to do?
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:16:58 +0200, Mirat Can Bayrak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:14:10 -0500
Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why don't you want to use one of these libraries for doing the thing that
you want to do?
mmm lets say i want
cts* are for.
Not exclusively, generators also preserve state.
def _spam():
count = 1
while 1:
yield "spam " * count
count += 1
spam = _spam.next()
Surprise - generators are objects.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:20:49 -0200, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:24:20 -0200, Krzysztof Retel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Nov 20, 4:00 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Nov, 16:03, Krzysztof Retel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am struggling writing
simpler ways, though, based on other XML libraries.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
the `unittest´ module in the standard library and take things to the
next level.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ch an implementation would deal with the
fact that telnet encodes \r as \r\0 for you.
Twisted includes a telnet implementation, as well as facilities for reading
stdin asynchronously (which will let you avoid indefinite hangs).
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
dy. The parent then just waits for
those bytes. It looks like you entirely control the child in this case,
so that should be possible here.
Alternatively, maybe by "properly initialized" you mean something very
specific about how subprocess.Popen creates processes. If so
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:32:13 +0100, jkv wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
sys.stdout.write('Password: ');
#IAC DO ECHO sys.stdout.write('\xFF\xFB\x01')
password = raw_input()
If the client sends 'qwerty\r\n' everything is fine and the password ge
ng which would cause a correctly written server (in C or any
other language with BSD socket APIs) to fail. I suggest investigating
how telnet and your Python client differ, then looking into the C code
to find out how that difference can trigger a bug in it.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
ython isn't available, cgi is said to be slow, mod_wsgi looks
complicated...
What would you suggest?
Try Python 2.x instead. If you go with Python 3, you're going to run
into the same limited library selection over and over.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
yright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
import os
pid = os.fork()
As soon as this returns, you have two CPython processes reading from stdin
and writing to stdout. They fight over your input and their output gets
interleaved in non-deterministic ways. Basical
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:50:51 -0800, Minesh Patel wrote:
I am trying to figure out the best approach to solve this problem:
I want to poll various directories(can be run in the main thread).
Once I notice a file has been added to any directory, I grab a lock,
spawn a thread to go perform the nece
en you can probably see the behavior you were expecting.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
is to work around a bug in
CPython on Windows where a process in a blocking read cannot be interrupted
by C-c in the console? If that's the case, there may be other approaches
to solving the problem (like fixing the bug in CPython which causes this).
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ntrol (you might have something like 32kb or 64kb level
control).
What abt in Python3 ?
It seems to have some header like the one below : b'b495 - binary mode
with 46229 bytes ? Or is it something else ?
That's just a bug in urllib in Python 3.0.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mai
etter choice for me, except that Python is
much more elegant. :-)
I'm sure people will tell you that this is a good use of threads and that
Python is up to the task. I think it's a bad use of threads, but with a
different approach, I still think Python is up to the task.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:17:56 + (UTC), "R. David Murray"
wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:15:23 +0530, Saurabh wrote:
>> This isn't exactly how things work. The server *sends* you bytes. It can
>> send you a lot at once. To some exte
processes instead,
if there really is more hardware that's sitting idle with your single
threaded version.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ust surely
fail. For example, uid/gid setting is broken.
I'd recommend adding an automated test suite, fixing all the issues that
come up during that process, and then asking for scrutiny again.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ed as could be (it's also only 14 lines long).
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
t you integrate with a
GUI toolkit. Since Twisted encourages you to write programs which deal
with things asynchronously in a single thread, if you use it, your
concerns about data exchange, locking, and timing should be addressed
as a simple consequence of your overall program structure.
Je
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:19:58 +1100, Ben Finney
wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone writes:
The biggest shortcoming seems to be a complete lack of unit tests.
A full unit test suite is in the source distribution's ‘tests/’
directory. You can run it with ‘python ./setup.py test’.
Of course th
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 03:13:36 -0700 (PDT), Nick Timkovich
wrote:
On Mar 21, 9:19 pm, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:52:21 -0700 (PDT), Nick Timkovich
wrote:
>I've been working on a program that will talk to an embedded device
>over the serial port, using some b
ets paused, and when the buffer is empty
again, it gets resumed.
Hope this helps!
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:30:04 -0500, Nick Craig-Wood wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
[snip]
In the case of a TCP to serial forwarder, you don't actually have to
implement either a producer or a consumer, since both the TCP connection
and the serial connection are already both prod
onds, an 1875% improvement.
Surely you mean a 94.7% improvement?
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:42:46 +1100, Ben Finney
wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone writes:
[snip]
An additional feature which would be useful for the library to
provide, however, would be the setting of euid and egid instead of
uid and gid. This is necessary, for example, to write an SSH daemon
://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/TwistedTrial
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:20:49 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:30:04 -0500, Nick Craig-Wood
wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
[snip]
After bringing in all the heavy machinery of Twisted,
you're still polling at 10Hz. That's disappointi
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:23:25 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:20:49 -0700, John Nagle wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 05:30:04 -0500, Nick Craig-Wood
wrote:
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
[snip]
After bringing in all the
1101 - 1200 of 1970 matches
Mail list logo
