Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Ben Cartwright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Philippe Martin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I renamed A_Func(self) to fix that ... but is there a cleaner way around ?
>>
>>When using multiple inheritence, the order of the base classes matters!
Duncan Booth wrote:
(snip)
> Usually though, if a subclass doesn't immediately call the base class
> constructors as the first thing it does in __init__ it indicates poor code
> and should be refactored.
Not necessarily. It's a common case to have some computations to do/some
attributes to set i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering, why you always have to remember to call bases'
> constructors
s/constructors/__init__/
the __init__() method is *not* the constructor. Object's instanciation
is a two-stage process: __new__() is called first, then __init__().
--
bruno desthuillier
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> bruno at modulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>(snip)
>>
>>>I think you're taking Python's OO-ness too seriously. One of the
&
Derick van Niekerk wrote:
> I have been developing in PHP for some time now and needed to look into
> application frameworks to speed up my development. I was looking into
> Horde and CakePHP before I was introduced to Python. I started learing
> python and within a few *hours* I already wrote my f
Duncan Booth wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>
>>Duncan Booth wrote:
>>(snip)
>>
>>>Usually though, if a subclass doesn't immediately call the base class
>>>constructors as the first thing it does in __init__ it indicates poor
>>>
Benji York wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>> Zope is a world in itself - and is certainly not the simplest tool to
>> learn (nor the most pythonic).
>
>
> Those statements apply more to Zope 2 than Zope 3 (and Zope 2 is moving
> more and more toward Zope 3 thes
through the tutorial (which is simply a Zope product you can
> add from the main page of the ZMI (Zope Management Interface), have a peek
> at the Zope book
> (http://www.zope.org/Documentation/Books/ZopeBook/2_6Edition/view).
Actually, the OP was asking about Zope3, which is a *very* di
Duncan Booth wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>
>>>What I think I'm trying to get at is that I believe that most
>>>situations where someone actually tries to do something in the base
>>>initialiser which requires calling a virtual method are probably als
Duncan Booth wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>
>>It's *already* split : __new__ construct the object, __init__
>>initialize it.
>>
>>>That's why I would go for the 2-phase construction:
>>
>>But that's already what you have.
&g
TG wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> I'm trying to create a simple class called Vector which inherit from
> array.
Which array ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ python
Python 2.4.2 (#1, Feb 9 2006, 02:40:32)
[GCC 3.4.5 (Gentoo 3.4.5, ssp-3.4.5-1.0, pie-8.7.9)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "licen
TG wrote:
> Obviously, there is something I didn't catch in python's inheritance.
Nope. Obviously, array.array doesn't respect the usual rules.
> from array import array
> class Vector(array):
> def __init__(self,size):
> print self.typecode
> array.__init__(self,'f')
>
>
>>
Philippe Martin wrote:
>
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>>TG wrote:
>>
>>>Hi there.
>>>
>>>I'm trying to create a simple class called Vector which inherit from
>>>array.
>>
>>Which array ?
>
> I think he did
>
> fr
Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
> TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote [something like]:
>>from array import array
>
>>class Vector(array):
>> def __init__(self,size):
>> array.__init__('f')
>>
>>v = Vector('c')
>>print repr(v)
>>
>>will output :
>>
>>array('c')
>
>
> Is this a case of new-sytle classes
e. But Duncan (implicitely) meant "deleting the method
*and* the calls to the method".
The point is that dothis() returns a value (that is not used), and
doesn't modify the state of self.
Or at least, this what *I* understood.
> Is the point that one could refactor out the self.dot
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Sandra-24 a écrit :
>>
>>>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Sandra-24" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Now that is a clever
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Carl Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>bruno at modulix wrote:
>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>>I was wondering, why you always ha
TG wrote:
> Hmm ... I'm definitely not a python wizard, but it seems to be quite a
> special case that breaks the rules ...
Yes and no. The primary use case for __new__ was to allow subclassing of
immutable types. array.array is not immutable, but it's still a special
case, in that it enforce typ
erical cruft and warts accumulated from the
past, it's time to throw away and clean up, even if it breaks a lot of
things. Trying to keep compatibility at any price would be just suicidal
IMHO - time to get rid of old warts and come back to simplicity. "one
obvious way to do it" ru
bruno at modulix wrote:
> Thomas Guettler wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I like python because it is compatible to old versions. That's way I think
>>string exceptions should not be deprecated.
>>
>>I use string exceptions if the condition for an assertio
Peter Otten wrote:
(snip)
>
> Can you cheat and just assign another known good func_code object?
def hello(): print "hello"
> ...
def world(): print "world"
> ...
def use_it(hello=hello, world=world):
> ... hello()
> ... world()
> ...
use_it()
> hello
> world
world.func
eicwo01 wrote:
> Without to know the names, is it possible to dump all attributes of a
> com object?
> from win32com.adsi import *
from module import * is Bad(tm)
> objDom = ADsOpenObject("LDAP:/ ...
> print ???"all attributes"??? of objDom
Look at dir() and
Panos Laganakos wrote:
> I've been thinking if there's a point in applying some specific OOP
> techniques in Python as we do in other languages.
Yes - but some of these techniques are somewhat python-specific.
> i.e. we usually define private properties and provide public functions
> to access th
eicwo01 wrote:
> Thanks for your tips.
> But dir() and inspect did not really help.
Really ?
def dump(obj):
for name in dir(obj):
print getattr(obj, name)
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])
Duncan Booth wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>
>>eicwo01 wrote:
>>
>>>Thanks for your tips.
>>>But dir() and inspect did not really help.
>>
>>Really ?
>>
>>def dump(obj):
>> for name in dir(obj):
>> print ge
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello, recently i tried to use list.append() function in seemingly
> logical ways,
What seems logical and how it really works may not be the same... As a
general rule, for builtin types, destructive methods returns None. I
personnaly find it a wart, but what, it's the B
this data, ideally by taking an RTF
>>or plaintext file as a template and replacing placeholder tags with my
>>data.
>>Are there any good pre-written systems that would allow me to do this?
>
>
> Maybe the built-in string interpolation is sufficient?
>
&
lly unaware of this.
> The syntax "b." is completely
> different from the syntax of any other type of parameter.
>
> The mismatch between the number of parameters declared in the method
> signature and the number of arguments actually passed
There's no mismatch at this l
John Salerno wrote:
> Is there a way to assign multiple variables to the same value,
> but so
> that an identity test still evaluates to False?
re-phrase it according to how Python works, and you'll get the answer:
"Is there a way to bind multiple names to the same object, but so the
identity of
John Salerno wrote:
> Boris Borcic wrote:
>
>> >>> w == x
>> False
>> >>> w is x
>> True
>> >>>
>
>
> That's the opposite of what I want to happen.
And that wouldn't be really helpful anyway !-)
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) fo
Edward Elliott wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>>>that 1) b is an object not a module*, and 2) objects pass references to
>>>themselves as the first argument to their methods.
>>
>>Nope. It's the MethodType object (a descriptor) that wraps the functio
John Salerno wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>> But my question (sorry, it may not have been clear) was more along the
>> line of : "why do you worry about identity in the given snippet ?".
>
>
> Actually, I kind of thought that maybe it *didn't* matter in this
> particular example anyway
bruce wrote:
> Hi..
>
> In doing some research into Workflow apps regarding document management, I
> came across Zope. Given that it's Python Based, I figured I'd shout to the
> group here...
Zope is Python based, but it's a world in itself, and probably not the
most pythonic app around (which do
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
(snip)
> Since Python 3K is supposed to be the 'clean the warts and don't bother
> breaking compat' rewrite of Python, you may as well propose a PEP on
> this. You'll have to really prove it doesn't break anything else in the
> object model, have strong and articulate arg
Jack wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having a little trouble trying to read a binary file, I would like
> to write an ascii to Metastock converter in python but am not having a
> lot of success.
>
> The file formats are
>
> http://sf.gds.tuwien.ac.at/00-pdf/m/mstockfl/MetaStock.pdf
>
>
> If any one can p
Nico Grubert wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am looking for a way to sort a list containing dictionaries.
>
> This is my example list:
> [{'Title': 'ABC', 'from_datetime': DateTime('2006/04/25 12:45:00
> GMT+2')}, {'Title': 'DEF', 'from_datetime': DateTime('2006/04/18
> 12:45:00 GMT+2')}, {'Title': 'GHI
Eric Deveaud wrote:
(snip)
>
> sort can take a comparaison function.
The problem with it is that it may slow down things a lot...
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
bruce wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've never used Python/Plone, and am wondering if I can talk with anyone
> who's used Plone. I'm trying to determine if Plone could be easily used for
> a potential application.
Then you'd better post this to the plone and/or zope mailing lists.
--
bruno desthuilliers
Larry Bates wrote:
> Fredp wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>I was wondering if it is possible to have the various magic methods,
>>mainly __getattr__ and __setattr__, and @property attributes called
>>when accessing the attribute of a non-intantiated class.
>>
>>Imagin something like this:
>>#
>>class MyClass:
Fredp wrote:
(snip)
> I have something like a simple ORM which objects haven't a fixed number
> of fields, and I need to have properties (or methods) for each of them,
dumbiest possible example, but this should het you started
class Field(object):
# dummy
def __init__(self, **kw):
self._
param
(usually named 'cls').
>
>>>e.g. when it sees "def method (a,b)"
>>
>>This has to be in a class statement - else it's shouldn't be touched.
>
> Exactly, that's why I called it method and not func.
Technically, they are st
Edward Elliott wrote:
> Bryan wrote:
>
>> >>> keepchars = set(string.letters + string.digits + '-.')
>
>
> Now that looks a lot better. Just don't forget the underscore. :)
>
You may also want to have a look at string.translate() and
strin
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>> Martin P. Hellwig a écrit :
>>
>>> I created a class which creates a relative unique id string, now my
>>> program just works fine and as expected but somehow I get the feeling
>>> that I misused the __repr__ since I guess people expect
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Why not just use the call operator instead ? ie:
>>
>> >>> id = IDGenerator(...)
>> >>> id()
>> 01_20060424_151903_1
>> >>> id()
>> 01_20060424_151905_2
>>
>
> Because of:
>
> id = IDGenerator("01",99)
> id()
>>
>> Trace
t;different to when a function is created outside the class
>>>definition and added as a method to the object at run-time.
>>>
>>>Thus breaking not only "explicit is better than implicit",
>>
>>This one can be subject to discussion.
>
>
> All the
Edward Elliott wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
>>As I understand it, the point was not what the code does, but to give
>>a sample input (a Python program) for the "simple text processor" you
>>described to wade through.
>
>
> Ah, well then, there's no need for a full-blown parser. It should suffic
Gary Wessle wrote:
> Ryan Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Gary Wessle wrote:
>>
>>>the example was an in-accuretlly representation of a the problem I am
>>>having. my apologies.
>>>
(snip)
> I finally was able to duplicate the error with a through away code
> as follows,
>
>
;strHostname, &nPortNumber)
You have to understand that Python and C are totally different beasts.
A C variable is mostly symbolic name for a memory address, tagged with
type infos. Assigning to a variable means storing a value at this
address. Reading a variable means retrieving whatever va
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> I'm picking this up via clp on Google Groups. I can't tell what Mr.
> Lundh is referring to. The first line of his post is: "Tim Williams
> wrote" but there's nothing that comes before. I had seen the article on
> Django on Digg I think, but what is article Tim Williams i
A.M wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any efficient online resource or book that help experienced Perl
> programmers to Python?
>
My fellow coworker - experimented Perl coder - confirms that the
official tutorial and diveintopython should be enough to get you
started. Also, the Python Cookbook and read
Edward Elliott wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>>Edward Elliott wrote:
>>
>>>Ah, well then, there's no need for a full-blown parser. It should
>>>suffice to recognize a class definition and modify the parameter list of
>>>every def i
TG wrote:
> That's great, thanks !
>
> To put it short, when I create a Stimulus object, it first seek
> __new__() method. But if I don't define it, it looks for the one
> defined in Vector. This raises a problem because the parameters passed
> to Stimulus(params) aren't fitting with Vector parame
Paul Rubin wrote:
> bruno at modulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>What's wrong with:
>>
>>assert foo and bar and i > 10, \
>> "if foo and bar i must not be greater than 10"
>
>
> It doesn't necessarily do anything. With op
tBook that only do the
dispatch.
Else - and depending on the context, needs, specs and whatnot, I'd look
either at the visitor pattern (or any custom double-dispatch) or at an
existing multimethod implementation (like David Mertz's multimethod or
Philip Eby's protocol.dispatch).
My 2 ce
s in production code, and have one of the first Python entry in
the Daily WTF !-)
What are you trying to do, exactly ? I've been scratching my head for at
least 5 minutes without finding any sensible reason to write such code.
> I know I can do this with a try but ...
???
Slightly ot, bu
Philippe Martin wrote:
(snip)
>
> l_init really is a boolean parameter and l_value a value that _might_ exist
> in a shelve.
>
> So I just want to have a parameter to a method so if the first value tested
> is false (l_init) then the second (l_value) does not get tested ... because
> it is the se
Philippe Martin wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>
>>Philippe Martin wrote:
>>(snip)
>>
>>>l_init really is a boolean parameter and l_value a value that _might_
>>>exist in a shelve.
>>>
>>>So I just want to have a parameter to
bruce wrote:
> Hi...
>
> Never used python, but I have a question regarding Drop Down Menus. Does
> Python allow me to create a website,
Yes.
> that will permit the user to create
> Drop Down menus that can be initiated with the right mouse click?
Not sure to understand what you mean, but this
Mark Harrison wrote:
> Is there a way to do something equivalent to "import * from self"?
(snip)
>
> Is there a way to get rid of those the "self." references,
No.
> or is this
> just something I need to get my brain to accept?
Yes.
And FWIW, "from somemodule import *" is usually considered bad
Mark Harrison wrote:
> Is there a way to automatically print all the instance
> data in a class? This is for debugging, I would like
> to do something like dump(self) to snapshot the state
> of the object.
def dump(obj):
buf = ['%r %s :' % (obj, str(obj)]
for name in dir(obj):
attr = geta
CServer).
(snip)
>
>>You would then have a 'server' class that just provides common
>>services and dispatch to specialized objects.
>
> Neat. It won't play nice with dir() or SimpleXMLRPCServer's
> introspection functions though (system.listMethods(),
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I played around with my old code before I saw your post, and I believe
> I've found a solution that's a bit neater than what I had before. I
> thought I could just as well post it if you're interested and have the
> time. This one uses multiple inheritance, but it's legal
John Salerno wrote:
> John Salerno wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Even if you don't end up referring to self or any instance
>>> attributes within the method
>>
>>
>> Hmm, follow-up: I *do* plan to refer to instance attributes inside
>> these methods (self.something), but does that re
John Salerno wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I'm having trouble deciphering what this bit means - "but these
>> functions will be called from another method in the class, not from the
>> instance itself", I don't think it makes sense.
>
>
> Yeah, I'm starting to see that as I tried to imp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> John Salerno wrote:
>
>>What I originally meant was that they would not be called from an
>>instance *outside* the class itself, i.e. they won't be used when
>>writing another script, they are only used by the class itself.
>
>
> Yep, so you want to encapsulate the fun
John Salerno wrote:
> John Salerno wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> John Salerno wrote:
>>>
What I originally meant was that they would not be called from an
instance *outside* the class itself, i.e. they won't be used when
writing another script, they are only used by th
Davy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
(snip)
> Does Python support robust regular expression like Perl?
Yes.
> And Python and Perl's File content manipulation, which is better?
>From a raw perf and write-only POV, Perl clearly beats Python (regarding
I/O, Perl is faster than C - or it least it was the last
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a python code which is running on a huge data set. After
> starting the program the computer becomes unstable and gets very
> diffucult to even open konsole to kill that process. What I am assuming
> is that I am running out of memory.
>
> What should I do to make
(mylist)
>
> Is there a more elegant way to do it?
for N:
mylist = [mylist]
> The maine idea is: from a list having the numbre of steps along N
> dimensions, generate a list with an item at each possible point.
>
> Example 1: N=2 list=[2,3] result=[[1,2],[1,2],[1,2]]
> Examp
Lawrence Oluyede wrote:
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>However, I wonder why L.sort() don't return the reference L, the
>>performance of return L and None may be the same.
>
>
> It's not "the same". sort() does not return anything.
Yes it does : it returns the None ob
vbgunz wrote:
> to throw fire on the fuel (:P), you can get the value back to an
> in-place mutable change with a single expression...
>
> mylist = [2,3,4,1]
> print mylist.sort() or mylist
>
> might not be too pythonic or maybe it is. I guess depends on what side
> of the glass you might wish to
John Salerno wrote:
> Gary Herron wrote:
>
>> Gary John Salerno wrote:
>>
>>> How do you make a single string span multiple lines, but also allow
>>> yourself to indent the second (third, etc.) lines so that it lines up
>>> where you want it, without causing the newlines and tabs or spaces to
>>>
Metalone wrote:
> I have a question about the interactive Python shell. Is it possible
> to reload a file and get the new definitions.
>
> For example, if I do
> import xyz
>
> Then I find a bug in some function in xyz.
> So, I edit xyz.py
>
> I would like to reload the definitions in xyz.py wi
Heavy wrote:
> Sorry,
> you got reason, I thought I can write in my language, cause this is the
> first time that I post a question in this group...
usually, the comp.* usenet hierarchy is english-speaking.
> My problem is that I
> have to receive parameters from a POST method, i try to read th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(top-post corrected)
>
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>>I have a python code which is running on a huge data set. After
>>>starting the program the computer becomes unstable and gets very
>>>dif
ter.I am
> not sure what package is best for and would like to know before I
> order one of those three.
I don't which is "better", but wxPython is still the best choice IMHO if
you worry about portability and licencing issues.
But what don't you take the time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, this is true.
>
> Well, you consider that my app has a first windows, where I choose, for
> example, the application 1.
> The application 1 will be started, and it will allocate 200Mb total.
> Now I want to abort this operation, and i will return to main initial
> w
the
problem *actually* was with Python - just that it *may* have to do with
a memory management issue fixed in 2.5. And, while we're at it : your
application uses a GUI toolkit and does image manipulations, so the
problem can also come from one of these packages...
I also suggested that it may h
Edward Elliott wrote:
(snip)
>>don a écrit :
>>
>>>Also if there is a better way than using regex, please let me know.
>>
(snip)
>
> I wouldn't call these better (or worse) than regexes, but a slight variation
> on the above:
>
> marker = s.index('/CHECKEDOUT')
> branch = s [s.rindex('/', 0, mark
Lad wrote:
> I use Python 2.3.
> I have heard about decorators in Python 2.4.
What Python 2.4 adds is only syntactic sugar for decorators. You can do
the same - somewhat more explicitely - in 2.3.
> What is the decorator useful for?
FWIW, I'm not sure the name 'decorator' is such a great idea. A
be delete
> line13 <---to be delete
> xyz
> line15
> line16
> line17
> line18
>
> I wish to delete lines that are in between 'abc' and 'xyz' and print
> the rest of the lines. Which is the best way to do it? Should i get
> everything into a list, g
glomde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to create a function that preprocesses a file and then imports
> the parsed file.
>
> What I found out is that you can do something like this:
>
> def ImportFile(fileName):
> parsedCode = Parser(fileName).Parse()
> module = new.module(name)
> exec parse
bruno at modulix wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
(snip)
>
> Don't know if it's better for your actual use case, but this avoids
> reading up the whole file:
> def skip(iterable, skipfrom, skipuntil):
> """ example usage :
> >>&
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
(snip)
> to print to a file instead of stdout, just replace the print line with a
> f.write call.
>
Or redirect stdout to a file when calling the program !-)
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTEC
Tim Chase wrote:
(snip)
> starLines = [line for line in p.readlines() if line.startswith("*")]
files are iterators, so no need to use readlines() (unless it's an old
Python version of course):
starLines = [line for line in p if line.startswith("*")]
> or you may optionally want to prune of the "
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> bruno at modulix" wrote:
>
>
>>*please* re-read carefully what I and Diez wrote earlier in this thread
>>before jumping to possibly erroneous conclusion. I didn't say that the
>>problem *actually* was with Python - just that it *may*
Carl J. Van Arsdall wrote:
(snip)
> I just wanted to make the comment that there already exists a
> Condition() class in the threading module. If you plan on using your
> class with the threading module you might wish to use another name.
>
As far as I remember, Python has namespaces, so I don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i posted for suggestions a little idea even if it still needs further
> thoughts but as i'm sure you could help :)
>
> if would like to implement some kind of Condition class which i coud
> use to build bricks of more complex condition, conditions are based o
Tim Chase wrote:
>>> starLines = [line for line in p.readlines() if line.startswith("*")]
>>
>>
>> files are iterators, so no need to use readlines() (unless it's an old
>> Python version of course):
>>
>> starLines = [line for line in p if line.startswith("*")]
>
>
> Having started with some old
Martin Blume wrote:
> "bruno at modulix" schrieb
>
(snip)
>>def deco(func):
>> print "decorating %s" % func.__name__
>> def _wrapper(*args, **kw):
>>print "%s called " % func.__name__
>>res = func(*args, **kw)
>>
Duncan Booth wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>
>>>Otherwise, just to be informed, what advantage does rstrip() have over
>>>[:-1] (if the two cases are considered uneventfully the same)?
>>
>>1/ if your line doesn't end with a newline, lin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>I basically want to remotely shut down windows from linux and write
>>such a program in python.
>
FWIW, s/from linux/from another machine/
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p
t him/her to the documentation.
>>>Another question: Isn't decorating / wrapping
>>> usually done at runtime, so that the @deco
>>>notation is pretty useless (because you'd
>>>have to change the original code)?
>>
>>Please explain why that
Ted wrote:
> Thank you Roy.
>
> It seems if you lurk here long enough you eventually get all you
> questions answered without even asking!
> ;-)
>
+1 QOTW
please avoid top-posting, and please avoid posting back a long message
just to add three lines.
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '
Martin Blume wrote:
> "bruno at modulix" schrieb
>
>>[snip]
>>
>>The use case for @decorator is for wrapping functions
>>or method *in the module/class itself*.
>
> That was the question. What's the use of doing it
> like that in the modul
x27;d only
once - when the def block is eval'd, which is usually at import time.
> # it does
> def f(a, L=[]):
> L.append(a)
Here, you are modifying the (list) object bound to local name L.
> return L
> print f('a')
> print f('b')
>
>
Jacky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just started learning Python and would like to starting writing some
> web-based applications with Python.
>
> I did have pretty much experience with doing so with PHP and Java, but
> Python seems a bit different for me.
>
> Do you guys have some good web framework t
RADO and JSF), so all recommendations are
> welcomed :)
You might want to have a look at Turbogears.
> Thank you!
>
>
(snip)
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
to, almost the same thing:
>
>>>> from Foo import Foo
>>>> Foo.bar()
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in ?
> TypeError: unbound method bar() must be called with Foo instance as
> first argument (got nothing instead)
&
ent System
"""
(http://www.plone.org)
FWIW, it's based on Zope, which is a Python-based web application server
> I am confused on what Turbogears is aswell
A Python web MVC framework.
> because of the lack of
> documentation for it.
I think there's at least e
301 - 400 of 607 matches
Mail list logo
