Panos Laganakos wrote:
> I've been thinking if there's a point in applying some specific OOP
> techniques in Python as we do in other languages.
Yes - but some of these techniques are somewhat python-specific.
> i.e. we usually define private properties and provide public functions
> to access them, in the form of:
> get { ... } set { ... }
>
> Should we do the same in Python:
No.
>
> Or there's no point in doing so?
Absolutely. Python has descriptors and properties, which allow you to
switch from a direct attribute access to a computed attributes without
breaking the API. In fact, think of public attributes as automatic
getter/setters pairs, that you can customize when needed !-)
> Some other techniques come to mind, but I think that Python tends to
> allow the programmer to access stuff he wants even though he shouldn't
s/he shouldn't/he knows he's messing with implementation details and
assume the consequences.
FWIW, accessing 'private' attributes in Java or C++ is not a big deal.
> or in the form of a dict or list, rather than a method to do so.
Python is *object* oriented - not class-oriented - and doesn't force you
to put everything into a class definition. Now everything in Python is
an object (including functions and classes and modules...). This is a
much less restricted (and IMHO much much more powerful) approach than
what you may learn from Java, C++, C# etc.
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
