On Tuesday 26 May 2015 12:24, davidf...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am writing a web service that accepts Python programs as input, runs the
> provided program with some profiling hooks, and returns various
> information about the program's runtime behavior. To do this in a safe
> manner, I need to be ab
On Tuesday 26 May 2015 14:34, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> Apart from PEP 8, is this documented anywhere in the official
>> documentation? If so, I have been unable to find it.
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#reserved-
classes-of-identifiers
That's the bunny!
Thanks for th
On 26/05/2015 04:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 8:48:11 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2015 12:17 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
In other words, dunder methods are reserved for use by the core developers
for the use of the Python interpreter.
Er, that's ea
In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 17:10:30 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>My sense is that the only way to safely sandbox Python is to create your own
>Python implementation designed with security in mind. You can't get there
>starting from CPython. Maybe Jython?
You get there starting with Py
In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 09:53:56 +0200, Laura Creighton writes:
>In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 17:10:30 +1000, "Steven D'Aprano" writes:
>>My sense is that the only way to safely sandbox Python is to create your own
>>Python implementation designed with security in mind. You can't get
On Monday, May 25, 2015 at 10:24:32 PM UTC-4, davi...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am writing a web service that accepts Python programs as input, runs the
> provided program with some profiling hooks, and returns various information
> about the program's runtime behavior. To do this in a safe manner, I
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 4:24:32 AM UTC+2, davi...@gmail.com wrote:
> I am writing a web service that accepts Python programs as input, runs the
> provided program with some profiling hooks, and returns various information
> about the program's runtime behavior. To do this in a safe manner, I
Hey all thanks for the answers,
I am done wiht the same .
Sorry fore delayed replied
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:27 AM, John Gordon wrote:
> In pra devOPS <
> siv.dev...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I wanted to compare two json files ignoring few of the keys in the json
> > files.
>
> > Can anybody
On Mon, May 25, 2015, at 15:21, ravas wrote:
> Is this valid? Does it apply to python?
> Any other thoughts? :D
The math.hypot function uses the C library's function which should deal
with such concerns internally. There is a fallback version in case the C
library does not have this function, in P
Hi,
I want to use OpenCV with Python.
I installed version 2.4.9
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary/files/opencv-unix/2.4.9/opencv-2.4.9.zip/)
in debian Squeeze running Python 2.6.6. Using the tutorial:
http://indranilsinharoy.com/2012/11/01/installing-opencv-on-linux/
(I tried t
On Tue, May 26, 2015, at 09:40, random...@fastmail.us wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015, at 15:21, ravas wrote:
> > Is this valid? Does it apply to python?
> > Any other thoughts? :D
>
> The math.hypot function uses the C library's function which should deal
> with such concerns internally. There is a
In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 10:24:30 -0300, Markos writes:
>Hi,
>
>I want to use OpenCV with Python.
>
>I installed version 2.4.9
>(http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary/files/opencv-unix/2.4.9/opencv-2.4.9.zip/)
>
>in debian Squeeze running Python 2.6.6. Using the tutorial:
>http:/
> Apart from object composition or mix-in style, I want to illustrate something
> regarding the "arrow" of inheritance.
>
> class super_dict(dict):
>
> def __init__(self, init={}, default_value=0, collision_function=None):
>*expands what dict can do*
>
> def get_default(self):
Hi everyone,
I've installed the 'progress' module (ver 1.2) and I have the following
error when used:
File
"/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/python3.2/site-packages/progress/bar.py",
line 48
empty_fill = u'∙'
^
SyntaxError: inv
Markos wrote:
^^
Please append your last name.
> I want to use OpenCV with Python.
>
> I installed version 2.4.9
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary/files/opencv-unix/2.4.9/opencv-2.4.9.zip/)
> in debian Squeeze running Python 2.6.6. Using the tutorial:
> http://indranilsinharoy.
On 26/05/2015 16:48, alb wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've installed the 'progress' module (ver 1.2) and I have the following
error when used:
File
"/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/python3.2/site-packages/progress/bar.py",
line 48
empty_fill = u'∙'
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 26/05/2015 16:48, alb wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I've installed the 'progress' module (ver 1.2) and I have the following
>> error when used:
>>
>>File
>> "/home/debian/repos/2418_IASI-NG/Documents/Tools/tex_tool/venv/local/lib/pyt
Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended) about
self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol rather than
a name?
Something like:
class MyClass(object):
def __init__(@):
@.dummy = None
OR, even better, getting *rid of it* in t
In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 09:37:29 -0700, zipher writes:
>Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended) about
>self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol rather
>than a name?
>
>Something like:
>
>class MyClass(object):
>
>def __ini
zipher wrote:
> Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended)
> about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol
> rather than a name?
>
> Something like:
>
> class MyClass(object):
>
> def __init__(@):
> @.dummy = None
Just seein
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 9:19:35 PM UTC+5:30, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
wrote:
> Markos wrote:
> ^^
> Please append your last name.
No more required than an affidavit proving PointedEars is your legal name
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 26/05/2015 17:37, zipher wrote:
Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended) about
self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol rather than a name?
Something like:
class MyClass(object):
def __init__(@):
@.dummy = None
OR, e
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Yes, how about you taking a permanent holiday rather than bother this list
> with more of your nonsense?
No need to be nasty about it. The suggestion is a plausible one, it
just happens to not fit Python's philosophy. The best response is to
On Tue, May 26, 2015, at 12:57, Laura Creighton wrote:
> Guido did. :)
> http://neopythonic.blogspot.se/2008/10/why-explicit-self-has-to-stay.html
It's worth noting that the "dynamically modify a class" argument (and to
some extent the decorator argument) misses Javascript's solution - _any_
func
zipher :
> Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun
> unintended) about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing
> it into a symbol rather than a name?
>
> Something like:
>
> class MyClass(object):
>
> def __init__(@):
> @.dummy = None
>
> OR, even better
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 3:47:20 PM UTC-4, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> zipher :
>
> > Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun
> > unintended) about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing
> > it into a symbol rather than a name?
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > class
zipher wrote:
> Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun
> unintended) about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing
> it into a symbol rather than a name?
>
> Something like:
>
> class MyClass(object):
>
> def __init__(@):
> @.dummy = None
Believe
Ned Batchelder :
> I would find it much clearer to not use a nested class at all, and
> instead to pass the object into the constructor:
Nested classes are excellent and expressing the state pattern http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_pattern>.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 26/05/2015 21:26, garabik-news-2005...@kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk wrote:
zipher wrote:
Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun
unintended) about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing
it into a symbol rather than a name?
Something like:
class MyClass(object):
On 05/26/2015 08:57 AM, zipher wrote:
> Comprende? I'm not trying to be cryptic here. This is a bit of OOP
> theory to be discussed.
No, sorry. Maybe an actual example (with use case) would spur discussion.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 08:57 AM, zipher wrote:
>> Comprende? I'm not trying to be cryptic here. This is a bit of OOP
>> theory to be discussed.
>
> No, sorry. Maybe an actual example (with use case) would spur discussion.
Better yet, ignore the t
Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> def __init__(ስ):
>> ስ.dummy = None
> Apart from breaking all the tools that rely on "self" being spelt "self"
> this looks like an excellent idea.
too bad for the tools: using the name "self" is just a convention, not a
rule.
--
By ZeD
--
https://mail.pyt
On 2015-05-26 21:45, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> class MyClass(object):
>> def __init__(ስ):
>> ስ.dummy = None
>
> Apart from breaking all the tools that rely on "self" being spelt
> "self" this looks like an excellent idea.
Though to be fair, they *are* broken tools if they rely on "self"
Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 9:19:35 PM UTC+5:30, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> wrote:
>> Markos wrote:
>> ^^
>> Please append your last name.
>
> No more required than an affidavit proving PointedEars is your legal name
In addition to this utter nonsense, do you have anyth
I realized that I mentioned earlier that I found a solution to my original
question, but that I never posted an example of the solution. So, here is a
simplified example for anyone who is interested.
def fArray(fselect, fparm = 1):
def A1(p = fparm):
if p == 1:
In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 19:43:31 -0500, richard_riehle writes:
>I realized that I mentioned earlier that I found a solution to my original
>question, but that I never posted an example of the solution. So, here is a
>simplified example for anyone who is interested.
>
>def fArray(fselec
On 05/26/2015 05:43 PM, richard_riehle wrote:
I realized that I mentioned earlier that I found a solution to my original
question, but that I never posted an example of the solution. So, here is a
simplified example for anyone who is interested.
def fArray(fselect, fparm = 1):
def A
What is PyDev?
---
PyDev is an open-source Python IDE on top of Eclipse for Python, Jython and
IronPython development.
It comes with goodies such as code completion, syntax highlighting, syntax
analysis, code analysis, refactor, debug, interactive console, etc.
Details on
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 12:28:31 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 26/05/2015 17:37, zipher wrote:
> > Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended)
> > about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol
> > rather than a name?
>
> Yes, how
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 11:57:44 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 09:37:29 -0700, zipher writes:
> >Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended)
> >about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol
> >rathe
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 9:48:25 PM UTC-5, zipher wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 12:28:31 PM UTC-5, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > On 26/05/2015 17:37, zipher wrote:
> > > Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended)
> > > about self and the ulterior spellings of it,
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 11:57:44 AM UTC-5, Laura Creighton wrote:
> In a message of Tue, 26 May 2015 09:37:29 -0700, zipher writes:
> >Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended)
> >about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol
> >rathe
zipher writes:
> Arrgh. Sorry, that was meant privately...
I'm glad we saw it publicly, so that we get more of an idea how you
treat people.
That kind of homophobic slur is inappropriate from anyone in this
community. Kindly cut it out altogether.
--
\ “Always do right. This will grat
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015 at 6:52:00 AM UTC-7, Markos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use OpenCV with Python.
>
> I installed version 2.4.9
> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/opencvlibrary/files/opencv-unix/2.4.9/opencv-2.4.9.zip/)
>
> in debian Squeeze running Python 2.6.6. Using the tutorial:
> h
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 02:37, zipher wrote:
> Would it be prudent to rid the long-standing "argument" (pun unintended)
> about self and the ulterior spellings of it, by changing it into a symbol
> rather than a name?
No.
> Something like:
>
> class MyClass(object):
>
> def __init__(@):
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 05:46, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Python's practice works. However, a small problem is presented by nested
> classes:
>
> class Connection:
> def __init__(self):
> class Idle:
> def signal_start(self):
> # how to re
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 06:45, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Apart from breaking all the tools that rely on "self" being spelt "self"
> this looks like an excellent idea.
Tools which rely on self being spelled "self" are already broken. It's a
convention, nothing more, and there are various good reaso
On Wednesday 27 May 2015 14:39, Ben Finney wrote:
> zipher writes:
>
>> Arrgh. Sorry, that was meant privately...
>
> I'm glad we saw it publicly, so that we get more of an idea how you
> treat people.
>
> That kind of homophobic slur is inappropriate from anyone in this
> community. Kindly c
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 06:45, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
>> Apart from breaking all the tools that rely on "self" being spelt "self"
>> this looks like an excellent idea.
>
> Tools which rely on self being spelled "self" are already broken. I
49 matches
Mail list logo
