dtran...@gmail.com Wrote in message:
> On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:16:50 PM UTC-4, Dave Angel wrote:
>> dtran...@gmail.com Wrote in message:
>> >
>>
>> > def two(c1 , c2):
>>
>> > c1 = chartonum(c1)
>>
>> > c2 = chartonum(c2)
>>
>> > return numtochar(c1 + c2 %26)
>>
>>
>>
>>
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:23:49 -0700, dtran.ru wrote:
> Thanks for your input Dave. Would the line be:
>
> return numtochar(c1 + c2 %26)
Yes, that's the line that Dave is talking about.
The critical part is that expression "c1 + c2 %26" which gets calculated
before being passed on to numtochar.
On Friday, March 21, 2014 8:53:49 AM UTC+5:30, wrote:
> On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:16:50 PM UTC-4, Dave Angel wrote:
> > > Hello good people I am working on a caeser cipher program for class.
> > > However, I ran into a problem with my outputs. Up to a certain point for
> > > example:
> > > 1
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 11:58:43 PM UTC-4, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 20:23:49 -0700, dtran.ru wrote:
>
>
>
> > Thanks for your input Dave. Would the line be:
>
> >
>
> > return numtochar(c1 + c2 %26)
>
>
>
> Yes, that's the line that Dave is talking about.
>
>
>
>
On 21Mar2014 13:14, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> > Regarding having Mercurial installed, that is very easy, and after
> > you've gone (eg):
> >
> > hg clone https://bitbucket.org/cameron_simpson/css
> > my-copy-of-cameron's-css
> >
> > (or
"Cameron Simpson" wrote in message
news:20140321013313.ga58...@cskk.homeip.net...
>
> Someone intending to clone the project and develop will probably
> want the whole repository; as Gregory says - they can then easily
> push/pull with others.
>
> For Frank, the size of the repo is not the size
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Frank Millman wrote:
> To make the software available to anyone who just wants to run a stable
> version, copy the working directory of the 'major release' repository to a
> directory of its own, without the .hg stuff, and make it available for
> download.
>
> For
Chris Angelico :
> go for the lowest common denominator:
>
> print("some single string")
>
> which works happily in all versions of Python.
Whenever I have used "print" in my code, it has been with a >>
redirection.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
>
>> go for the lowest common denominator:
>>
>> print("some single string")
>>
>> which works happily in all versions of Python.
>
> Whenever I have used "print" in my code, it has been with a >>
> redirection.
Then you're
On 21Mar2014 07:40, Frank Millman wrote:
> "Cameron Simpson" wrote in message
> news:20140321013313.ga58...@cskk.homeip.net...
> > Someone intending to clone the project and develop will probably
> > want the whole repository; as Gregory says - they can then easily
> > push/pull with others.
> >
Chris Angelico :
> Then you're probably not using "sys.stdout.write" but some other file
> object's write method.
Correct, sys.stderr.write would have been a more accurate choice.
> Also, I find it highly unusual that you never use print in its most
> basic and intended form.
Printing to the st
On Friday, March 21, 2014 11:38:42 AM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
> > Then you're probably not using "sys.stdout.write" but some other file
> > object's write method.
> Correct, sys.stderr.write would have been a more accurate choice.
> > Also, I find it highly unusual tha
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
