On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Frank Millman wrote:
> I have decided to stick with Mercurial, simply because that is what I used
> in my previous attempt and I felt comfortable with it.
That's the best reason for choosing, really.
https://github.com/Rosuav/Gypsum/commit/0f973
> Also I believe t
z = a + b*i with a, b, elements of R
z = r*exp(i*phi)with r, phi, elements of R
z = [[a, -b], [b, a]] with a, b, elements of R
This is, in my mind, more questionable:
>>> complex(2, 1+1j)
(1+1j)
>>>
>>> print(complex.__doc__)
complex(real[, imag]) -> complex number
Create a complex n
Steven D'Aprano :
> If you are in a position to randomize the data before storing it in
> the tree, an unbalanced binary tree is a solid contender.
Applications that can assume randomly distributed data are exceedingly
rare and even then, you can't easily discount the possibility of
worst-case or
wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
> This is, in my mind, more questionable:
>
complex(2, 1+1j)
> (1+1j)
I find it neat, actually.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
hi guys,
i want the python interactive shell to be auto complete and i found that by
adding the following lines in PYTHONSTARTUP file it is possible
import rlcompleter, readline
readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
but i get the following error in git bash shell
Note: i run windows8 as Operat
On 19/03/2014 08:55, muru kessan wrote:
> hi guys,
> i want the python interactive shell to be auto complete and i found that
> by adding the following lines in PYTHONSTARTUP file it is possible
>
> import rlcompleter, readline
> readline.parse_and_bind('tab: complete')
>
> but i get the followin
Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit :
> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
> > This is, in my mind, more questionable:
>
> >
>
> complex(2, 1+1j)
>
> > (1+1j)
>
>
>
> I find it neat, actually.
>
>
>
>
>
> Marko
>>> # tricky: yes, neat: no
>>> complex(1+1j, 2)
wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
> Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit :
>> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>> complex(2, 1+1j)
>> > (1+1j)
>>
>> I find it neat, actually.
>
# tricky: yes, neat: no
complex(1+1j, 2)
> (1+3j)
So complex(a, b) is documented to produce a+bj when
===
>BREAKING NEWS
===
>
RICHARD LEAKEY JUST DIED DUE TO HEART FAILURE!
>
THE REASONS DESCRIBED BY THE MEDICAL TEAM IS THAT HIS WORK WAS
DISPROVEN, BY NONE OTHER THAN YOUR OWN BASTARD, THRINAXODON.
>
THIS CAUSED LEAKEY'S HEART TO EXPLODE!
>
THRINAXOD
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>
>> Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit :
>>> wxjmfa...@gmail.com:
>>> complex(2, 1+1j)
>>> > (1+1j)
>>>
>>> I find it neat, actually.
>>
> # tricky: yes, neat: no
> complex(1+1j
Ian Kelly :
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> So complex(a, b) is documented to produce a+bj when a and b are integers
>> or floats. What's more natural than saying it produces a+bj when a and b
>> are complex numbers? It's a straightforward generalization that in no
>>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> When is it ever useful though?
About as often as int(0), float(0), or float(0.0) which all work as
expected, though probably don't turn up in a lot of code.
Skip
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I've released version 0.1.8 of distlib on PyPI [1]. For newcomers,
distlib is a library of packaging functionality which is intended
to be usable as the basis for third-party packaging tools.
The main changes in this release are as follows:
* Fixed issue #45: Improved thread-safety in SimpleScrap
Your handling Pick Multi value fields aren't you ;)
Just hit the same issue, thanks all here for various solutions.
Interfacing with OpenQM / Scarlet DME here.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:49:33 +0200, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano :
>
>> If you are in a position to randomize the data before storing it in the
>> tree, an unbalanced binary tree is a solid contender.
>
> Applications that can assume randomly distributed data are exceedingly
> rare
Steven D'Aprano :
> Please re-read what I wrote. I didn't say "if your data comes to you
> fully randomized". I said "if you are in a position to randomize the
> data before storing it". In other words, if you actively randomize the
> data yourself.
Yes, you could implement a "hash table" that wa
In article <53299eac$0$29994$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> If you have a million items, then the odds that those
> million items happen to be sorted (the worst-case order) are 1 in a
> million factorial. That's a rather small number, small enough that we can
>
On 19/03/2014 13:11, diccon.tes...@gmail.com wrote:
Your handling Pick Multi value fields aren't you ;)
Just hit the same issue, thanks all here for various solutions.
Interfacing with OpenQM / Scarlet DME here.
The context is conspicious by its absence. In future would you please
be kind en
On 19/03/2014 13:11, diccon.tes...@gmail.com wrote:
> Your handling Pick Multi value fields aren't you ;)
> Just hit the same issue, thanks all here for various solutions.
> Interfacing with OpenQM / Scarlet DME here.
For future posts, please be sure to quote what you're replying to.
Google Groups
Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 12:04:06 UTC+1, Skip Montanaro a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> > When is it ever useful though?
>
>
>
> About as often as int(0), float(0), or float(0.0) which all work as
>
> expected, though probably don't turn up in a lot of code.
On 19/03/2014 14:43, Zachary Ware wrote:
Ironically, on my way down the November 2012 archive page, I noticed a
long thread about "Obnoxious postings from Google Groups".
Thankfully the number of grotty postings from gg has dropped
considerably. Sadly our resident unicode expert quite delibe
Hi!
Is there already a date when the theme will be announced?
Am Sonntag, 16. März 2014 18:42:16 UTC+1 schrieb qua-non:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Kivy will be holding it's programming contest for 2014 starting April 15th.
>
> For details please visit http://kivy.org/#contest
>
> If you are interested in
On 03/18/2014 06:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:21:28 -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Marko Rauhamaa
wrote:
Dan Stromberg :
For a proper comparison, I'd like a fixed, identical dataset and set of
operations run against each data structure.
H
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> When is it ever useful though?
>
> About as often as int(0), float(0), or float(0.0) which all work as
> expected, though probably don't turn up in a lot of code.
The analogous call to t
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ian Kelly :
>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> So complex(a, b) is documented to produce a+bj when a and b are integers
>>> or floats. What's more natural than saying it produces a+bj when a and b
>>> are comple
The theme will be announced when the contest officially starts, the 15th
April.
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 09:27:14 UTC, audiowerk wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Is there already a date when the theme will be announced?
>
> Am Sonntag, 16. März 2014 18:42:16 UTC+1 schrieb qua-non:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> Kivy
In my GUI, the user enters two values: cellNumber(Integer) and
SerialNumber(String)
I have the following piece of code in my view/controller:
The following function is called after the user enters the
cellnumber and serial number##
def ListenForDetails(status):
It seems that when I attempt to download blob or clob data using fetchmany, it
can not keep track of the LOB variable in subsequent fetch. The problem is over
if I fetch one row at a time but it is not optimal. Can anyone give me an idea
how to efficiently fetch columns with clob or blob data fr
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 21:45:52 -, Dan Stromberg
wrote:
blist.sorteddict was able to do 65536 operations on a dictionary
before taking more than 120 seconds to complete - it took 77.3
seconds to do 65536 operations.
65536 is a suspiciously round number. You might want to double-
check th
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Rhodri James wrote:
> 65536 is a suspiciously round number. You might want to double-
> check that there's no 16-bit overflow causing something unexpected.
It's because I'm using powers of 2. All the numbers in the report are
round in hex.
--
https://mail.pytho
Dear,
I just wrote a sample like this:
testPy/
__init__.py
client.py
SoamFactory.c
SoamFactory.so
soamapi.py
sample/testP.py
export PYTHONPATH=$(TEST_LOCATION):$(TEST_LOCATION)/testPy
Here's the source codes:
__init__.py:
import client
client.
31 matches
Mail list logo
