Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit : > wxjmfa...@gmail.com: > > > > > This is, in my mind, more questionable: > > > > > >>>> complex(2, 1+1j) > > > (1+1j) > > > > I find it neat, actually. > > > > > > Marko
>>> # tricky: yes, neat: no >>> complex(1+1j, 2) (1+3j) >>> -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
