wxjmfa...@gmail.com: > Le mercredi 19 mars 2014 09:51:20 UTC+1, Marko Rauhamaa a écrit : >> wxjmfa...@gmail.com: >> >>>> complex(2, 1+1j) >> > (1+1j) >> >> I find it neat, actually. > >>>> # tricky: yes, neat: no >>>> complex(1+1j, 2) > (1+3j)
So complex(a, b) is documented to produce a+bj when a and b are integers or floats. What's more natural than saying it produces a+bj when a and b are complex numbers? It's a straightforward generalization that in no way violates the more limited documentation. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
