nbvf...@gmail.com wrote:
> (test)chris@amnesia:~$ pip install django-easydump
> Downloading/unpacking django-easydump
> Could not find any downloads that satisfy the requirement django-easydump
> No distributions at all found for django-easydump
> Storing complete log in /Users/chris/.pip/pip.log
in my computer
C:\Python27>python
Python 2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
on win
32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
1.
>>> f=open(r'c:\windows\temp\test','r')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
IOError:
Hello,
First of all..I am very new to python with no background in development
area! :)
Ok, here is my problem.I have opened a file and I need to check each
line of that file. I have done it with a while loop.
res_own_file = open('/bah')
res_own_list = res_own_file.readline()
res_tot_list=[]
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Bryan wrote:
> > Python 3(K) likes to use the same '.py' file extension as its
> > incompatible predecessors,
>
> And so it should.
We disagree. Not surprising in a "gotcha's" thread.
> > and in some/many/most *nix implementations,
> > it likes to install in the same plac
> IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'c:\\windows\\temp\\test.txt'
> would you mind telling me what's wrong ?
>
I think the file that you try to open does not exists :)
Please be more specific. What are you trying to achieve, and are you
absolutely sure that such a file exist?
Almar
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Bryan
wrote:
> Yes, that was just silly of me to write that. All I want is a new
> general convention for the most-likely-to-work invocation that won't
> break with the change: "#!/usr/bin/env python" for Python 2 versus,
> for example, "#!/usr/bin/env python3". Of
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Nibin V M wrote:
> res_own_file = open('/bah')
> res_own_list = res_own_file.readline()
> res_tot_list=[]
> while res_own_list:
> res_own_list=res_own_list.strip()
> res_own_list=res_own_list.replace(' ', '')
> res_name=res_own_list.split(':')
> if res_name
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:13 PM, contro opinion wrote:
> in my computer
> C:\Python27>python
> Python 2.7.2 (default, Jun 12 2011, 15:08:59) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)] on
> win
> 32
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> 1.
f=open(r'c:\windows\temp\test','
Hi Stefan,
What do you think would be a "natural" way to name the
> future returned by `put_bytes` and possibly the `was_sent`
> method attached to it? Can you even come up with nice naming
> rules for futures and their methods? :-)
>
I think the intended way to get notified when a future is done
On 15/04/2012 10:23, Bryan wrote:
My perspective is simply different from yours. I'm not the one who
installs python on most of the boxes where I work or play. There's
little consistency, so I love conventions that usually work. I'd like
to advocate for Python 3, but the default install on Windo
In <87aa2iz3l1@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>, on 04/11/2012
at 05:32 PM, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" said:
>You're confused. C doesn't have arrays. Lisp has arrays. C only has
>vectors
Neither C nor any other programming language has vectors ;-)
>That C calls its vectors "array", or its byt
Paramiko is a Python library for SSH (Secure Shell). Over about the
last year, I've grown dependent upon it. Its home page is still easy
to search up, but the links to its mailing list and repository don't
work.
Paramiko depends on PyCrypto, and not so long ago that dependency was
the stated reaso
On 04/14/2012 04:22 PM, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
> However, I'm not comfortable with the combination of the
> names of the future and its method. After all, not the
> `put_result` was sent, but the data that was the argument in
> the `put_bytes` call. Maybe `data_was_sent` is better than
> `was_sent
I want to write an Android application using Python. I've found 2 options for
that: kivy and SL4A. In kivy, at least for now, I can't use the GPS data.
Anyone knows if I can get the GPS data using SL4A with Python? As I understood,
one can write commercial apps using kivy. On the other hand, wit
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:23:27 -0700, Bryan wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Bryan wrote:
>> > Python 3(K) likes to use the same '.py' file extension as its
>> > incompatible predecessors,
>>
>> And so it should.
>
> We disagree. Not surprising in a "gotcha's" thread.
Yes, but I have reasons for
On 2012-04-15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>
>> We disagree. Not surprising in a "gotcha's" thread.
>
> Yes, but I have reasons for disagreeing, which you trimmed out of your
> response. If you have reasons for thinking that a separate file extension
> for Python 3 is a good idea, you are keeping i
You can try appaccelerator, it seems to support python and you should be
able to access geolocalisation (according to wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appcelerator_Titanium)
Le 15 avril 2012 16:44, Noam Peled a écrit :
> I want to write an Android application using Python. I've found 2 o
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Shmuel Metz
wrote:
> In <87aa2iz3l1@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>, on 04/11/2012
> Â at 05:32 PM, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" said:
>
>>You're confused. C doesn't have arrays. Â Lisp has arrays. C only has
>>vectors
>
> Neither C nor any other programming langua
On Apr 15, 7:47 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:25:57 -0700, vmars316 wrote:
> > win7HomePremium:
> > Greetings,
> > 1)
> > I installed portablePython(pP) here:
> > C:\Users\vmars\Python3
> > ?Does that look ok?
>
> Sure, why not?
>
> > 2)
> > I would like to try pyWin, but it
On Apr 14, 11:25 pm, vmars316 wrote:
> win7HomePremium:
> Greetings,
> 1)
> I installed portablePython(pP) here:
> C:\Users\vmars\Python3
> ?Does that look ok?
A brief look at portable python's website indicates that its meant for
running off usb sticks (ie without installation)
If you are insta
Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wrote a `Connection` class that can be found at [1]. A
> `Connection` object has a method `put_bytes(data)` which
> returns a "future" [2]. The data will be sent asynchronously
> by a thread attached to the connection object.
>
> The future object returned
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:30:39 +, Curt wrote:
> On 2012-04-15, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>>>
>>> We disagree. Not surprising in a "gotcha's" thread.
>>
>> Yes, but I have reasons for disagreeing, which you trimmed out of your
>> response. If you have reasons for thinking that a separate file
>>
Steven wrote:
> Yes, but I have reasons for disagreeing, which you trimmed out of your
> response. If you have reasons for thinking that a separate file extension
> for Python 3 is a good idea, you are keeping it to yourself.
On Windows the file extension determines what executable opens the
file.
This is the behavior I need:
path = path.replace('\\', '')
msg = ". {} .. '{}' .. {} .".format(a, path, b)
Is there a better way?
Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Apr 15, 2:07 pm, Kiuhnm wrote:
> This is the behavior I need:
> path = path.replace('\\', '')
> msg = ". {} .. '{}' .. {} .".format(a, path, b)
> Is there a better way?
>
A little more context would help. The quadruple-toothpick idiom
predates Python. It's a little hard on the
On 15Apr2012 00:22, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
| I wrote a `Connection` class that can be found at [1]. A
| `Connection` object has a method `put_bytes(data)` which
| returns a "future" [2]. The data will be sent asynchronously
| by a thread attached to the connection object.
[...]
| put_result =
On 4/15/2012 5:07 PM, Kiuhnm wrote:
This is the behavior I need:
path = path.replace('\\', '')
Is there a better way?
For one-time use, and given that you cannot un-double with the r prefix,
not that I know of. For using the substrings multiple times, name them.
>>> s = r'abc\cd\ef'
>>>
On 4/15/2012 12:16 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Shmuel Metz
wrote:
In<87aa2iz3l1@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>, on 04/11/2012
at 05:32 PM, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" said:
You're confused. C doesn't have arrays. Lisp has arrays. C only has
vectors
Neither C
On 4/15/2012 5:13 AM, contro opinion wrote:
>>> f=open(r'c:\windows\temp\test','r')
>>> f=open('c:\\windows\\temp\\test','r')
Your life will be much happier is you use forward slashes for filenames
in Python programs.
f = open('c:/windows/temp/test', 'r')
You only need backslashes when
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 4/15/2012 12:16 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Shmuel  Metz
>> Â wrote:
>>>
>>> In<87aa2iz3l1@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>, on 04/11/2012
>>> Â at 05:32 PM, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Â said:
>>>
You're
On 4/15/2012 4:01 PM, Bryan wrote:
On Windows the file extension determines what executable opens the
file. Running both Python 2 and Python 3 on Windows is painful where
it doesn't need to be. I'd like to encourage my users to check out
Python 3, but installing it on Windows will take over the
On 15/04/2012 21:01, Bryan wrote:
Steven wrote:
Yes, but I have reasons for disagreeing, which you trimmed out of your
response. If you have reasons for thinking that a separate file extension
for Python 3 is a good idea, you are keeping it to yourself.
On Windows the file extension determines
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Bryan
wrote:
> On Windows the file extension determines what executable opens the
> file. Running both Python 2 and Python 3 on Windows is painful where
> it doesn't need to be. I'd like to encourage my users to check out
> Python 3, but installing it on Windows wi
On 4/15/2012 6:59 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/15/2012 12:16 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Shmuel Metz
wrote:
In<87aa2iz3l1@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com>, on 04/11/2012
at 05:32 PM, "Pascal J. Bourguignon"
On 4/15/2012 3:01 PM, Bryan wrote:
> I'd like to encourage my users to check out
> Python 3, but installing it on Windows will take over the '.py'
> extension and break stuff that currently works.
Have you tried telling your users to tell the installer not to do that?
IIRC, it's a simple checkbox o
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:07:36 +0200, Kiuhnm wrote:
> This is the behavior I need:
> path = path.replace('\\', '')
> msg = ". {} .. '{}' .. {} .".format(a, path, b)
> Is there a better way?
This works for me:
>>> a = "spam"
>>> b = "ham"
>>> path = r"C:\a\b\c\d\e.txt"
>>> msg = ". %
Greetings,
windows7, portablePython3.2:
What if i wanted to send myProg.py to a friend to RUN (who has python
installed).
Isn't there a way just to doubleClick on myProg.py, to get it into the
interpret/RUN?
Could i RUN a myProg.o ?
There must be a way to initiate the RUNning of a myProg.py without
On 4/15/2012 11:30 PM, vmars316 wrote:
> Isn't there a way just to doubleClick on myProg.py, to get it into the
> interpret/RUN?
Use the standard installer from python.org if you want to do things with
the registry. The standard installer sets up the registry for you so
that the interpreter will be
On 04/16/2012 12:30 AM, vmars316 wrote:
> Greetings,
> windows7, portablePython3.2:
> What if i wanted to send myProg.py to a friend to RUN (who has python
> installed).
> Isn't there a way just to doubleClick on myProg.py, to get it into the
> interpret/RUN?
> Could i RUN a myProg.o ?
> There must
Hi all,
I am trying to sort, in place, by column, a csv file AND sort it case
insensitive.
I was trying something like this, with no success:
import csv
import operator
def sortcsvbyfield(csvfilename, columnnumber):
with open(csvfilename, 'rb') as f:
readit = csv.reader(f)
thedata = li
On 04/16/2012 01:11 AM, Lee Chaplin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to sort, in place, by column, a csv file AND sort it case
> insensitive.
> I was trying something like this, with no success:
Could you perhaps qualify that "no success" bit? Do you mean it didn't
output a file, or that the file
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:30:48 -0700, vmars316 wrote:
> Greetings,
> windows7, portablePython3.2:
> What if i wanted to send myProg.py to a friend to RUN (who has python
> installed).
If your friend has Python installed, then double-clicking the .py file
should work fine.
> Isn't there a way ju
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:01:54 -0700, Bryan wrote:
> Steven wrote:
>> Yes, but I have reasons for disagreeing, which you trimmed out of your
>> response. If you have reasons for thinking that a separate file
>> extension for Python 3 is a good idea, you are keeping it to yourself.
>
> On Windows th
On Apr 16, 2:30 pm, vmars316 wrote:
> windows7, portablePython3.2:
Is there a reason why you're using Portable Python over the standard
install?
> What if i wanted to send myProg.py to a friend to RUN (who has python
> installed).
> Isn't there a way just to doubleClick on myProg.py, to get it i
On Apr 16, 3:34 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> The situation is worse on Windows, as Windows doesn't support hash-bang
> syntax. But that is being looked at now:
>
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0397/
>
> which should make supporting multiple Python versions much more pleasant
> Real Soon Now.
Steven D'Aprano writes:
>> Running both Python 2 and Python 3 on Windows is painful where it
>> doesn't need to be.
> And how is that different from any other two versions of Python?
1. The backwards incompatibility between 2 and 3 is much more serious
than between 2.x and 2.(x-1).
2. There is
Lee Chaplin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to sort, in place, by column, a csv file AND sort it case
> insensitive.
> I was trying something like this, with no success:
>
> import csv
> import operator
>
> def sortcsvbyfield(csvfilename, columnnumber):
> with open(csvfilename, 'rb') as f:
>
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> And how is that different from any other two versions of Python?
Python 3.0, also known as “Python 3000” or “Py3K”, is the first ever
*intentionally backwards incompatible* Python release. --GVR
> Unless both versions include the same libraries (either standard modules
>
48 matches
Mail list logo
