Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wrote a `Connection` class that can be found at [1]. A
> `Connection` object has a method `put_bytes(data)` which
> returns a "future" [2]. The data will be sent asynchronously
> by a thread attached to the connection object.
>
> The future object returned by `put_bytes` has a `was_sent`
> method which will return `True` once the sender thread has
> actually sent the data via a socket call. An example might
> look like
>
> put_result = connection.put_bytes(data)
> if put_result.was_sent(timeout=1.0):
> print "Data has been sent."
> else:
> print "Data hasn't been sent within one second."
>
> However, I'm not comfortable with the combination of the
> names of the future and its method. After all, not the
> `put_result` was sent, but the data that was the argument in
> the `put_bytes` call. Maybe `data_was_sent` is better than
> `was_sent`, but `put_result.data_was_sent()` doesn't feel
> right either.
<zip>
Just an idea:
put_result ==> dataput
was_sent ==> sent
dataput = connection.put_bytes(data)
if dataput.sent(timeout=1.0):
print "Data has been sent."
else:
print "Data hasn't been sent within one second."
--
Laurent POINTAL - laurent.poin...@laposte.net
3 allée des Orangers - 91940 Les Ulis - France
Tél. 01 69 29 06 59
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
