From: "Robert Kern"
in? Robin Dunn is the wxPython project lead.
Ok, in this case I understand why WxPython can't be included in stdlib.
I think there was a communication problem because the oldest list members
start with the idea that all the list members know who is who and they may
be th
From: "Alexander Kapps"
Please don't use the lower Linux user percentage as an argument here. If
you follow that path further, you would need to agree that it's only an
"insignificant" percent of people who need a screen reader, so why bother?
I didn't say that the Linux users or Mac users ar
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
It doesn't support a good voice synthesizer like Eloquence or IBM Via
voice, but only eSpeak which sounds horrible, it doesn't have a scripting
language
ready to use as JAWS and Window Eyes do, it doesn't offer the possibility
of reading with the mouse cursor as JAWS
From: "geremy condra"
The bottom line is that, yes, you do still have to convince people
that accessibility is important if you want them to do anything about
it. I have to do almost exactly the same thing in my field- everybody
knows that security is important, but every time I go to disclose a
From: "Brendan Simon (eTRIX)"
Since it seems the python motto is "Batteries included", then it would
seem to me that wxPython is the natural fit as it also has "Batteries
included" (e.g. accessibility, native look-n-feel, mature and evolving,
can produce simple or complex gui programs, etc, et
From: "Grant Edwards"
And, based on your behavior, you apparently don't like convincing
others or advancing the cause of accessibility. It seems you prefer to
annoy and alienate others.
From what I said, what was annoying?
I don't want to convince anyone, but I just want to inform the oth
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
>I don't want to convince anyone, but I just want to inform the others
and let >them know if they are doing something not recommended.
not recommended by -you-, which is different than by a community or the
subset of people you are attempting to represent. furthermore
On 2011-01-26 02:59:26 -0800, Xavier Heruacles said:
I have do some log processing which is usually huge. The length of each
line is variable. How can I get the last line?? Don't tell me to use
readlines or something like linecache...
This is not optimum or efficient, but it works! If you wa
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:37:20 -0800, Alan wrote:
> I have a class ``A`` that is intentionally incomplete: it has methods
> that refer to class variables that do not exist.
For the record, in Python it is usual to refer to "attributes" rather
than "class variables" and "instance variables". In Py
On Jan 27, 2:42 am, "Thomas L. Shinnick" wrote:
> At 08:17 PM 1/26/2011, Chris wrote:
>
> >I have a class (A, for instance) that possesses a boolean (A.b, for
> >instance) that is liable to change over an instance's lifetime.
>
> >Many of the methods of this class (A.foo, for instance) should not
Alan wrote:
I have a class ``A`` that is intentionally incomplete:
it has methods that refer to class variables that do not exist.
The class ``A`` has several complicated methods, a number
of which reference the "missing" class variables.
Obviously, I do not directly use ``A``.
I have a class fa
wxPython is not suitable for inclusion for many reasons.
One reason is that it is a *huge* library which requires a lot of
constant work (bugfixing, documentation, lots of commits, etc...)
which cannot weight on python development.
Keeping the two worlds separated is better for both of them,
especi
JB wrote:
One of my python scripts that takes a bunch of inputs from a tKinter
gui, generates a set of command line stings, and then threads them off
to subprocess for calls to other programs like Nuke and our render
farm has recently started randomly crashing pythonw.exe.
I'm taking a look at m
Octavian,
If I understand your message, you are frustrated with Tkinter because it
doesn't support accessability.
In several messages on this thread I pointed out that Tkinter can easily
be made accessable under Linux and Mac OS X.
Rather than throw out Tkinter entirely, why not work with the co
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:37:20 -0800, Alan wrote:
>
>> I have a class ``A`` that is intentionally incomplete: it has methods
>> that refer to class variables that do not exist.
>
> For the record, in Python it is usual to refer to "attributes
What are wrappers?
What entities do they wrap around?
Struggling to understand the concept.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
From:
Octavian,
If I understand your message, you are frustrated with Tkinter because it
doesn't support accessability.
In several messages on this thread I pointed out that Tkinter can easily
be made accessable under Linux and Mac OS X.
Rather than throw out Tkinter entirely, why not work wi
sl33k_ wrote:
What are wrappers?
What entities do they wrap around?
Struggling to understand the concept.
We would need a little bit of a context to answer that question, you
could be refering to differents things.
I'll give it a try on one common usage for wrapper:
A wrapper is a pytho
In article ,
Alice BevanâMcGregor wrote:
> On 2011-01-26 02:59:26 -0800, Xavier Heruacles said:
>
> > I have do some log processing which is usually huge. The length of each
> > line is variable. How can I get the last line?? Don't tell me to use
> > readlines or something like linecache...
>but what's wrong is that Python promotes a GUI which is not accessible
by including it as a default GUI.
You seem to have overlooked this multiple times and instead decided to
shove words in my mouth and continue on your line of selfishness which
is justified
apparently now by the fact that you
Eloq is an add-on, but it does support it.
>but only eSpeak which sounds horrible
That's your personal preference. Plenty use and like ESpeak.
>it doesn't have a scripting language ready to use as JAWS and Window
Eyes do,
Scripting is done in Python, (no, not some native scripting language),
and
27.01.2011, 15:55, "Roy Smith" :
> In article ;,
> Alice Bevan–McGregor ; wrote:
>
>> On 2011-01-26 02:59:26 -0800, Xavier Heruacles said:
>>> I have do some log processing which is usually huge. The length of each
>>> line is variable. How can I get the last line?? Don't tell me to use
>>> re
>We are talking about accessibility here. Are you saying that Tkinter
can be >recommended from the perspective of accessibility?
See my comment about shoving words in people's mouths; I did not hint,
nor did I come near saying that in that message.
On 1/27/2011 1:17 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
On 1/26/2011 11:02 PM Octavian Rasnita said...
As we all know, Python doesn't care too much about maintaining a
backward compatibility
Where'd you get this idea? Between v2 and v3 yes, that was the intent.
But otherwise, I think there's another miscommunication behind this...
See http://w
On Jan 25, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I could really use some help with a problem I'm having.
Hiya Craig,
I don't know if I can help, but it's really difficult to do without a full
working example.
Also, your code has several OS X-isms in it so I guess that's the
On 2011-01-26 01:43 , Luis M. González wrote:
> On Jan 24, 2:09 pm, santosh hs wrote:
>> i am beginner to python please tell me which is the best available
>> reference for beginner to start from novice
>
> If you are a complete beginner to programming, I suggest start with a
> tutorial such as "
Hi all,
I'm migrating code from python 2.4 to python 2.6 and I've got into troubles
with pickling/unpickling python Exceptions.
The following code works fine in 2.4 but not in 2.6.
See Exception1 example
I have found on python mail list similar problem
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-lis
On 1/26/11 11:02 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> As we all know, Python doesn't care too much about maintaining a
> backward compatibility
What? Nonsense.
There are strict compatibility requirements.
There was a one-time break with these; 2.x->3.x -- but that's it. It may
never happen again. If an
I am very new to object oriented concept, so I need to learn
everything frm basic, Will the above books fulfill
My need
On Monday, January 24, 2011, Jean-Michel Pichavant
wrote:
> santosh hs wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> i am beginner to python please tell me which is the best available
> reference for
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >but what's wrong is that Python promotes a GUI which is not accessible
> by including it as a default GUI.
> You seem to have overlooked this multiple times and instead decided to
> shove words in my mouth and continue on your line of selfishness which
> is justifi
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >It doesn't support a good voice synthesizer like Eloquence or IBM Via
> voice
> Eloq is an add-on, but it does support it.
If you are saying this, it means that you haven't used it for a long time, or
you just heard about it by searching on the web. Eloq is support
On Jan 27, 3:35 am, rantingrick wrote:
A certain small subset of any group will always be emotionally driven.
However we should not concern ourselves with this sort of non-
objectivity.
So, would this be like when rr disqualified himself by demanding posters
have at least a 120 IQ? ;)
~Eth
Terry Reedy wrote:
> Tk itself is purely a gui package -- abstract widgits, geometry placers
> to make them visible, and an event system to make them active. But it
> does have the baggage of needing tcl included. About a decade ago, some
> people had the idea of removing the tcl dependency, b
On 2011-01-27, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Yes you might be right. It is just my way of communicating and it
> might be too direct and some people might not like it.
Too direct is putting it mildly.
> I always consider the expressions like "How do you do" as having
> absolutely no value, because
On 2011-01-27, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> From: "Grant Edwards"
>> And, based on your behavior, you apparently don't like convincing
>> others or advancing the cause of accessibility. It seems you prefer to
>> annoy and alienate others.
>
>>From what I said, what was annoying?
>
>>> I don't want
On 2011-01-27, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> From: Octavian,
>
>> If I understand your message, you are frustrated with Tkinter because
>> it doesn't support accessability.
>>
>> In several messages on this thread I pointed out that Tkinter can
>> easily be made accessable under Linux and Mac OS X.
>
On 2011-01-27, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 1/25/11 3:02 PM, rantingrick wrote:
>> This is a major flaw in the design and i would be
>> happy to fix the flaw. However our "friend" Fredrick decided to
>> copyright the module to himself! What a jerk! Which is quite
>> disgusting considering that Tkint
From: "Emile van Sebille"
> On 1/26/2011 11:02 PM Octavian Rasnita said...
>
>> As we all know, Python doesn't care too much about maintaining a
>> backward compatibility
>
> Where'd you get this idea? Between v2 and v3 yes, that was the intent.
To be sincere I was thinking to the differences
From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
> >We are talking about accessibility here. Are you saying that Tkinter
> can be >recommended from the perspective of accessibility?
> See my comment about shoving words in people's mouths; I did not hint,
> nor did I come near saying that in that message.
But you as
The code will be multi-platform. The OSXisms are there as an example, though I
am developing on OS X machine.
I've distilled my problem down to a simpler case, so hopefully that'll help
troubleshoot.
I have 2 files:
test.py:
--
fro
On 1/27/11 9:55 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-01-27, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> From: "Grant Edwards"
>>> People will not separate your personality from the cause you espouse.
>>
>> Wow! that's really bad.
>
> It's less than ideal, but it the way people are.
>
> Is that a surprise to you?
On Jan 27, 1:28 am, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
> From: "Brendan Simon (eTRIX)"
>
> > Since it seems the python motto is "Batteries included", then it would
> > seem to me that wxPython is the natural fit as it also has "Batteries
> > included" (e.g. accessibility, native look-n-feel, mature and ev
>Tyler, you are a Linux and Mac user and you search with Google and try to
>explain how many things you know about NVDA, but it is obviously that
what >JAWS
1) Because you, your crew, and your group on a specific forum doesn't
like ESpeak doesn't disqualify an entire reader. The eloquence fixes
On 1/27/11 10:04 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-01-27, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>> On 1/25/11 3:02 PM, rantingrick wrote:
>>> This is a major flaw in the design and i would be
>>> happy to fix the flaw. However our "friend" Fredrick decided to
>>> copyright the module to himself! What a jerk! Whi
The other day i was processing an xml tree using lxml.etree. That tree
contained a namespace. During that processing i inserted an element.
Later on
i tried to find that element using xpath. And to my suprise that
element was
not found! Maybe my suprise is just the result of my marginal
knowledge
On Jan 27, 2:13 am, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
> > You may not like it, but that's a fact. If you are in favor of XYZ,
> > and act rude and insulting while espousing XYZ, people will react
> > against not only you but _also_ XYZ.
>
> I know what you are reffering to. :-)
> And I was hoping that t
On Jan 27, 2:17 am, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
> From: "Littlefield, Tyler"
[...]
> > Then when that fails, you try cramming
> > words in people's mouth to make them feel like they kick puppies, and to
> > bring everyone else to this same conclusion.
Tyler no one can *make* you *feel* like anyt
On 1/27/2011 10:09 AM Octavian Rasnita said...
From: "Emile van Sebille"
On 1/26/2011 11:02 PM Octavian Rasnita said...
As we all know, Python doesn't care too much about maintaining a
backward compatibility
Where'd you get this idea? Between v2 and v3 yes, that was the intent.
To be sinc
On Jan 26, 1:16 pm, Alexander Kapps wrote:
> Please don't use the lower Linux user percentage as an argument
> here. If you follow that path further, you would need to agree that
> it's only an "insignificant" percent of people who need a screen
> reader, so why bother?
Please don't use the low
> It might be true, however I have seen some modules that say that are ment for
> Python 2.5, for 2.6 or for 2.7, so there seem to be differences between these
> versions also.
Python cares *a lot* about maintaining backward compatibiilty between
all major versions.
This is so true that I manage
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Craig Yoshioka wrote:
> The code will be multi-platform. The OSXisms are there as an example, though
> I am developing on OS X machine.
>
> I've distilled my problem down to a simpler case, so hopefully that'll help
> troubleshoot.
>
> I have 2 files:
>
> test
>* Disclaimer: You are stupid if you think this is true. But seriously,
>Octavian makes it REALLY hard to continue caring about something that I
>actually cared about before and thought was important.
People like Octavian do that. Sadly, it is one of the things holding the
blind community back. I
santosh hs wrote:
I am very new to object oriented concept, so I need to learn
everything frm basic, Will the above books fulfill
My need
read this
http://www.freenetpages.co.uk/hp/alan.gauld/tutclass.htm
and stop when they start to talk about VBscript :)
JM
--
http://mail.python.org/m
On 2011-01-27, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 1/27/11 10:04 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2011-01-27, Stephen Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> In fact: everything that is "open source" is copyrighted. By
>>> definition[* see footnote].
>>
>> One (domestic US) exception would be open-source software written by
On Jan 27, 11:47 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-01-27, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> If you don't care about communicating with others, then being civil
> probably does have no value (except for keeping a job or being
> avoiding being beaten up on the playground). If you want to
> communicate (
On Jan 27, 3:43 pm, Jean-Michel Pichavant
wrote:
> santosh hs wrote:
> > I am very new to object oriented concept, so I need to learn
> > everything frm basic, Will the above books fulfill
> > My need
>
> read thishttp://www.freenetpages.co.uk/hp/alan.gauld/tutclass.htm
>
> and stop when they st
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Daniel Urban wrote:
>> That's just what I'd like and I suppose can't be currently done with
>> current ABC, PyProtocols or zope.interface implementations, right?
>
> It can. With __instancecheck__ you can override isinstance. It is
> possible (for example) to write
On 1/27/11 10:11 AM, rantingrick wrote:
> On Jan 27, 1:28 am, "Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
>> But WxPython is their work and they decision is their.
> Actually we
The word "we" does not mean what you think it means.
--
Stephen Hansen
... Also: Ixokai
... Mail: me+list/python (AT) ixokai
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Alan Franzoni wrote:
> Yes, __instancecheck__ could be used as an alternative hook with
> respect to maybe_implemented_by(), but there's no such logic for
> signature checking. That's a minor detail, I think.
On the contrary, now that I double checked, it can't be
On Jan 27, 11:45 pm, rantingrick wrote:
>
> When has Octavian been uncivil? This lecture of Octavian is ludicris!
> You are such a friendly totalitarian, how do you keep a strait face --
> Col. Hans Landa?
And this mutual 'support' between Octavian and Ranter is ludicris(sic)
Its quite clear to
hein, 27.01.2011 19:16:
The other day i was processing an xml tree using lxml.etree. That tree
contained a namespace. During that processing i inserted an element.
Later on
i tried to find that element using xpath. And to my suprise that
element was
not found! Maybe my suprise is just the result
On 1/27/2011 12:31 PM, Mark Roseman wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
Tk itself is purely a gui package -- abstract widgits, geometry placers
to make them visible, and an event system to make them active. But it
does have the baggage of needing tcl included. About a decade ago, some
people had the id
On 27.01.2011 19:33, rantingrick wrote:
Please don't use the lower accessibility percentage to prop up the low
Linux percentage in an attempt to win your argument. Because healthy
Linux users ARE NOT equal to handicapped people!
Please don't put words into my mouth, idiot. And read my complete
Alan Franzoni wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to have a system which lets me do certain actions if the
duck-type of a certain objects matches what I expect, i.e. I'd like to
have a formalization of what it's sometimes done through getattr()
calls:
if getattr(myobj, "somemethod", None) is not None:
my
Terry Reedy wrote:
> > 1. The performance issues of having Tk use Tcl are negligible; the bulk
> > of Tk (code-wise and time-wise) are spent in C. Tcl itself is also very
> > fast nowadays, using all the usual techniques that modern dynamic
> > languages use.
>
> I have the impression that tcl
On 1/27/2011 12:54 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Everything that's not accessible is not recommended.
By you. We get that.
>Tkinter should be at most accepted because there is no better solution,
As I said at the beginning of this thread, tkinter is currently the only
option. What would have h
>Because healthy Linux users ARE NOT equal to handicapped people!
O? I bet I could run circles around RR in the shell, any day. Why are
you trying to promote accessibility for a group of people you consider
not equal to a group of "healthy" people?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
On 1/27/2011 12:57 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
A very important way to help would be to test accessibility features
and post accurate, detailed, bug-reports.
For example: pygui pretty much uses native widgets on Windows and OX and
gtk (I believe) on *nix. How is the accessibility of those widget
On Jan 27, 2:00 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> AS far as I know, Guido has never recommended any particular gui and I
> believe he has avoided doing so when asked. He is happy that there are
> different choices.
different choices OUTSIDE the stdlib. INSIDE the stdlib we have no
choice. Just wanted to
On 2011-01-27, hein wrote:
> - How am i supposed to detect a missing namespace, if there
> are no differences in the serialized representation? (That's
> what i initially used to debug the problem.)
lxml's pretty printer is at fault, as it emits unprefixed names
whenever possible while seriali
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> When you signature check, do you mean counting the number of arguments, or
> actually checking argument types?
In order to check for argument types I should either assume type
annotation (python 3 only, optional) or parse the docstring for th
On Jan 27, 2:00 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 12:54 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> > Everything that's not accessible is not recommended.
>
> By you. We get that.
>
> >Tkinter should be at most accepted because there is no better solution,
>
> As I said at the beginning of this thread, t
On 1/27/2011 12:47 PM rantingrick said...
different choices OUTSIDE the stdlib. INSIDE the stdlib we have no
choice. Just wanted to make that clear.
Only when you restrict yourself to the artificial restriction of 'no
third party downloads allowed -- python must supply the right choice for
m
On Jan 24, 2:13 am, Alan Franzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to have a system which lets me do certain actions if the
> duck-type of a certain objects matches what I expect, i.e. I'd like to
> have a formalization of what it's sometimes done through getattr()
> calls:
>
> if getattr(myobj, "someme
On Jan 27, 3:19 pm, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 1/27/2011 12:47 PM rantingrick said...
>
> > different choices OUTSIDE the stdlib. INSIDE the stdlib we have no
> > choice. Just wanted to make that clear.
>
> Only when you restrict yourself to the artificial restriction of 'no
> third party downl
On 01/27/2011 04:10 PM, rantingrick wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2:00 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 1/27/2011 12:54 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>>
>>> Everything that's not accessible is not recommended.
>>
>> By you. We get that.
>>
>> >Tkinter should be at most accepted because there is no better solutio
On 2011-01-27, rantingrick wrote:
>> AS far as I know, Guido has never recommended any particular gui and I
>> believe he has avoided doing so when asked.
>
> Yes but his silence speaks louder than words. He is saying " While i
> won't defend Tkinter publicly, i won't promote any others as well".
On 1/27/2011 1:38 PM rantingrick said...
Continuing to lug Tkinter around
is killing Python's evolution.
Huh? Can you provide a reference where someone passed over python
because of tkinter's inclusion in the standard library?
You certainly can't mean that python's evolution over the past
On Jan 27, 3:48 pm, Corey Richardson wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 04:10 PM, rantingrick wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 27, 2:00 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> >> On 1/27/2011 12:54 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>
> >>> Everything that's not accessible is not recommended.
>
> >> By you. We get that.
>
> >>
On Jan 27, 4:10 am, sl33k_ wrote:
> What are wrappers?
>
> What entities do they wrap around?
>
> Struggling to understand the concept.
http://www.castle-cadenza.demon.co.uk/wrapper.htm
Raymond
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Carl Banks wrote:
> Write some kind of signature proxy to do it.
I don't have a specific implementation idea yet, I see how that grows.
> Based on this thread, you have quite specific requirements, so it's
> doubtful someone else has implemented exactly what you
On Jan 27, 3:48 pm, Corey Richardson wrote:
> A weak argument - yes. But the thought is there, and it's the thought
> that counts, right? ;-)
What thought? It screams lack of thought to me. We should just ignore
a clearly better option because some other option was chosen first,
THATS IT? Thats
On Jan 27, 3:54 pm, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2011-01-27, rantingrick wrote:
>
> >> AS far as I know, Guido has never recommended any particular gui and I
> >> believe he has avoided doing so when asked.
>
> > Yes but his silence speaks louder than words. He is saying " While i
> > won't defend T
On 01/27/2011 05:08 PM, rantingrick wrote:
>> wxPython is the best and most mature cross-platform GUI toolkit, given a
>> number of constraints. The only reason wxPython isn't the standard
>> Python GUI toolkit is that Tkinter was there first.
>> -- Guido van Rossum
>
> You forgot to put a date on
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 20:05, Alan Franzoni wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Alan Franzoni wrote:
>> Yes, __instancecheck__ could be used as an alternative hook with
>> respect to maybe_implemented_by(), but there's no such logic for
>> signature checking. That's a minor detail, I think
On 2011-01-27 12:18 , Stephen Hansen wrote:
On 1/27/11 10:04 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-01-27, Stephen Hansen wrote:
On 1/25/11 3:02 PM, rantingrick wrote:
This is a major flaw in the design and i would be
happy to fix the flaw. However our "friend" Fredrick decided to
copyright the mod
In article ,
Eric Frederich wrote:
>
>I have read through all the documentation here:
>
>http://docs.python.org/extending/newtypes.html
>
>I have not seen any documentation anywhere else explaining how to
>create custom defined objects from C. I have this need to create
>custom objects from
mpnordland wrote:
On 01/26/2011 03:26 PM, sl33k_ wrote:
How does "return True" and "return False" affect the execution of the
calling function?
Basically it will affect it in whatever way you design it to for example:
def lie_test(statement):
if statement is True:
return False
On 1/27/2011 2:28 PM rantingrick said...
And by
removing Tkinter not only would we take a huge burden from py-dev but
we would also free Tkinter from the chains of stdlib.
Actually, IIRC, very little effort is put into maintaining tkinter by
the py-dev crowd. I think I saw a post by Martin th
I did eventually get the original code to run from the command line but not the
interpreter, so the new example does have a similar problem.
Of course it's not as simple as saying I can't run an imported parallelized
function from the interpreter because I can, as long as the parallelized
funct
On 1/27/11 1:11 PM, rantingrick wrote:
Actually we don't want "Robins wxPython" in the stdlib "as is" anyway.
What we DO want is an abstraction API for the short term that plugs
into Robin's wx. Then over the long term we will either convince him
to create a better API OR just create our own wxPy
On 1/27/2011 4:48 PM, Corey Richardson wrote:
wxPython is the best and most mature cross-platform GUI toolkit, given a
number of constraints. The only reason wxPython isn't the standard
Python GUI toolkit is that Tkinter was there first.
-- Guido van Rossum
(from http://www.wxpython.org/quotes.
I stand corrected :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 27, 5:50 pm, Kevin Walzer wrote:
> On 1/27/11 1:11 PM, rantingrick wrote:
[...]
Hello again Kevin and nice to have you back!
Yes the minor details have been evolving over the course of this and
another thread. We have been floating new ideas all along the way in
an effort to get the best
thanks for explaining what I was doing wrong and how reading the file
works. What would you suggest I do to remedy the situation?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 28/01/2011 00:54, rantingrick AKA "Brian" wrote:
Yes the minor details have been evolving over the course of this and
another thread. We have been floating new ideas all along the way in
an effort to get the best result. In the very beginning because we all
know that wxPython IS HUGE i offered
On 28/01/2011 00:58, mpnordland wrote:
thanks for explaining what I was doing wrong and how reading the file
works. What would you suggest I do to remedy the situation?
Write the new config out to a new file and then replace the old file
with the new file. I'd use shutil.move(...) to do the rep
rantingrick wrote:
> You'll need to read that snippet in context to understand what i was
> talking about. Again, see my "tip of the day" in my last post to you.
Pass. I'd have to see value in what you say inside of the endless
masturbatory self-aggrandizement that you pass off as "visionary"
pos
On 01/27/2011 09:53 PM, alex23 wrote:
> rantingrick wrote:
>> You'll need to read that snippet in context to understand what i was
>> talking about. Again, see my "tip of the day" in my last post to you.
>
> Pass. I'd have to see value in what you say inside of the endless
> masturbatory self-agg
"Octavian Rasnita" wrote:
> Ok, in this case I understand why WxPython can't be included in stdlib.
> I think there was a communication problem because the oldest list members
> start with the idea that all the list members know who is who and they may
> be thinking that I don't want to accept the
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
