Luis M. Gonzalez wrote:
Robert Kern wrote:
Automatic type inferencing is great, but sometimes the inference is
"object". Being able to supply more information about types helps
Starkiller keep the inferences tight and specific.
Hmm... I'm not an expert in this subject at all, but I think that when
"John Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd suggest making them public rather than either protected or
> private. There's a precident with the complex module, where
> the real and imaginary parts are exposed as .real and .imag.
This isn't addressed in the PEP, and is an oversight on my part. I'
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> Regarding str() and repr() behaviour, Ka-Ping Yee proposes that repr() have
>> the same behaviour as str() and Tim Peters proposes that str() behave like
>> the
>> to-scientific-string operation from the Spec.
>
> This looks like a C
On 2004-12-26, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> string methods are nice, but nothing groundbreaking, and their niceness is
> almost entirely offset by the horrid "".join(seq) construct that keeps popping
> up when people take the "the string module is deprecated" yada yada too
> seriously
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) writes:
> While I'm in complete agreement about the "".join() construct on the
> basis of looks, I have come to appreciate the fact that I *never* mess up
> the order of arguments any more.
Yeah. When I needed joinable arrays of strings in Eiffel, I added them
to the ARRA
"B.G.R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on an interpreter for a university subject, which is programmed
> in python under linux.
> I got most of the work done and I'm just trying to settle some problems I've
> found on my way.
> Right now, the most important is reading the u
Mike Meyer wrote:
"John Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'd suggest making them public rather than either protected or
private. There's a precident with the complex module, where
the real and imaginary parts are exposed as .real and .imag.
This isn't addressed in the PEP, and is an oversight on
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a Slackware 9.1 box, I'm trying to detect if mpg123 is currently
> running/playing a song so that when the song is done, it'll play the next
> in the list. The problem is that popen'ing ps doesn't always give a
> correct return. My function is below and
Disregard all my posts on this thread, I just downloaded Boa-constructor which
has WxDialogs making my life so much simpler. Thanks for all the help though.
I was using SPE which uses WxGlade to make gui's, which isn't so bad if you're
familiar with the way Java works on GUIs that is, but Boa-Con
LutherRevisited wrote:
> Yes I have actually, I still can't figure out how to have my
application detect
> if a control has focus. If I could, I could just use the keydown
event with an
> if statement to push my button when it has focus and enter is
pressed.
I am gonna try and explain how to fish
Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> I've discovered a truly elegant trick with python programs that
> interpret other data.
Q0. Other than what?
> You make them ignore lines that start with # at
> the beginning of the line,
Q1. After the first user accidentally gets a # at the start of a real
data line, a fe
"Ishwor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you are curious about the detailed behavior of the CPython
implementation, the dis module is one aid. Compare
>>> def f1(l):
... l.extend([1])
... return l
...
>>> def f2(l):
... l += [1]
... return l
...
>>> impo
"Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Terry Reedy wrote:
>> I think it worth repeating that Python 3 is at yet something of a
>> pipedream, as indicated by the joke name Python 3000
> Right, though my understanding of PEP 3000[1] is that though "Python
Terry Reedy wrote:
"Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess the point of my question is to find out if this kind of nice
interaction of *args and iterators is something that's in the road-map.
If it is, then maybe there are parts of it that could be i
Quoth Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) writes:
...
|> But then, the above criticism applies: if interface and implementation
|> of a module are tightly coupled, you can't really do fully modular
|> programming AND static typing (forget type inferencing...).
|
| I
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
