Terry Reedy wrote:
"Steven Bethard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I guess the point of my question is to find out if this kind of nice interaction of *args and iterators is something that's in the road-map. If it is, then maybe there are parts of it that could be implemented in a way that's backwards compatible, even if the full system wouldn't be available for some time. (Perhaps something along the lines of "from __future__ import iter_args".)

You can certainly share your concerns with the PEP author. I believe that there is also a PyWiki page that you can directly add to.

Yeah, I found the wiki page too[1]. Does anyone know if it's okay to add things to this page? I had avoided doing so since it gives as its description "This page lists features that GvR has mentioned as goals for Python 3.0" which sounds like it's not intended for commentary by the general Python community.


Maybe I should start a Python3.0Wishlist page?

Steve

[1]http://www.python.org/moin/Python3_2e0

P.S. I thought about posting to python-dev where GvR might hear directly about this kind of thing, but it seems a little premature since most predictions put Python 3.0 at least 3-5 years from now.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to