Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mike Meyer wrote: >> Regarding str() and repr() behaviour, Ka-Ping Yee proposes that repr() have >> the same behaviour as str() and Tim Peters proposes that str() behave like >> the >> to-scientific-string operation from the Spec. > > This looks like a C & P leftover from the Decimal PEP :)
Yup. Thank you. This now reads: Regarding str() and repr() behaviour, repr() will be either ''rational(num)'' if the denominator is one, or ''rational(num, denom)'' if the denominator is not one. str() will be either ''num'' if the denominator is one, or ''(num / denom)'' if the denominator is not one. Is that acceptable? <mike -- Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
