* Gabriel Genellina (Wed, 16 May 2007 16:38:39 -0300)
> En Wed, 16 May 2007 12:18:35 -0300, Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
> > So the author knows that there's a hard limit of 64K on the comment
> > size, but feels it's more important to fail a little more quickly when
> > fed somet
Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You don't need to do that, you can just "monkey patch" the _EndRecData
> > function.
>
> For a quick & dirty test, sure. If I were certain I'd only ever use
> this on one machine for a limited time (viz, n
Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To search 64k for all zip files would slow down the opening of all zip
> files whereas most zipfiles don't have comments.
No, actually it would only slow down for files which do have comments,
assuming I understand the code correctly. IME most zipfiles
Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To quote from zipfile.py (2.4 library):
>
> # Search the last END_BLOCK bytes of the file for the record signature.
> # The comment is appended to the ZIP file and has a 16 bit length.
> # So the comment may be up to 64K long. We limit the
En Wed, 16 May 2007 23:14:38 -0300, Asun Friere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> On May 17, 5:38 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> This is not a good place for reporting bugs - use
>> http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?group_id=5470
>
> I disagree. Given that most suspected
On May 17, 5:38 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This is not a good place for reporting bugs - use
> http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?group_id=5470
I disagree. Given that most suspected bugs aren't, new users
especially would be wise to post their "bugs' here before filing a bu
Martin Maney wrote:
> To quote from zipfile.py (2.4 library):
>
> # Search the last END_BLOCK bytes of the file for the record signature.
> # The comment is appended to the ZIP file and has a 16 bit length.
> # So the comment may be up to 64K long. We limit the search for the
> #
En Wed, 16 May 2007 12:18:35 -0300, Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> So the author knows that there's a hard limit of 64K on the comment
> size, but feels it's more important to fail a little more quickly when
> fed something that's not a zipfile - or a perfectly legitimate zipfile
>
To quote from zipfile.py (2.4 library):
# Search the last END_BLOCK bytes of the file for the record signature.
# The comment is appended to the ZIP file and has a 16 bit length.
# So the comment may be up to 64K long. We limit the search for the
# signature to a few Kbytes at th
