* Gabriel Genellina (Wed, 16 May 2007 16:38:39 -0300) > En Wed, 16 May 2007 12:18:35 -0300, Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > escribió: > > So the author knows that there's a hard limit of 64K on the comment > > size, but feels it's more important to fail a little more quickly when > > fed something that's not a zipfile - or a perfectly legitimate zipfile > > that doesn't observe his ad-hoc 4K limitation. I don't have time to > > find a gentler way to say it because I have to find a work around for > > this arbitrary limit (1): this is stupid. > > This is not a good place for reporting bugs - use > http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?group_id=5470
Actually it is: ,--- | Giving the shortage of reviewer time, invalid bug reports on tracker | are a nuisance and a diversion from attending to valid reports and | reviewing patches. That is why I encourage people to post here for | community review. `--- http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/d57b1906d3ef68a5 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
