En Wed, 16 May 2007 12:18:35 -0300, Martin Maney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> So the author knows that there's a hard limit of 64K on the comment > size, but feels it's more important to fail a little more quickly when > fed something that's not a zipfile - or a perfectly legitimate zipfile > that doesn't observe his ad-hoc 4K limitation. I don't have time to > find a gentler way to say it because I have to find a work around for > this arbitrary limit (1): this is stupid. This is not a good place for reporting bugs - use http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?group_id=5470 -- Gabriel Genellina -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
