since I'm developing in Tkinter, I'm intrigued by your comment that:
"It allowed me to do things in hours,
which literally took weeks with tkinter, "
please elaborate!
Cheers
S
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
John J. Lee wrote:
The key question from my point of view is: can I write commercial
sell-if-I-want-to applications using Qt? If it is GPL, then I guess
the answer is 'no'?
Yes, you can write commercial apps. It's multi-licensed (commercial,
GPL, etc.): you get to pick the license(s) you want to
Andrew E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> > ..
> > While in PyQt world, I found these advantages:
> > + conceptually vastly superior
> > + powerful api/widgets/features
> > + fast as hell due to the efficient binding of a quite efficient lib
> > + cool tools, that are u
Swaroop C H wrote:
> For those who don't know, Qt 4 on Windows will be available under GPL.
> So, you can write a (GPLed) app using Qt 4 and run it on Windows, Mac,
> Linux and even embedded!
>
Yes, but the FAQ implies to me that they really don't want to encourage
people to use the GPL:
> Q:
Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
..
While in PyQt world, I found these advantages:
+ conceptually vastly superior
+ powerful api/widgets/features
+ fast as hell due to the efficient binding of a quite efficient lib
+ cool tools, that are unicode/translation aware
+ very efficient programming environme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've narrowed down my toolkit selection for my project to wxPython and
> pyQt, and now i'd like to hear any opinions, war stories, peeves, etc,
> about them, particularly from anyone who's used _both_toolkits_. I'm
> only mildly interested in the IDEs and UI designers fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
I've narrowed down my toolkit selection for my project to wxPython and
pyQt, and now i'd like to hear any opinions, war stories, peeves, etc,
about them, particularly from anyone who's used _both_toolkits_. I'm
only mildly interested in the IDEs and UI designers for ea
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:55:23 +1100, Mike P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally for ease of use Qt is the way to go. I'm really looking forward
> to Qt 4 coming out, and then sometime later PyQt 4. Then I'll be able to
> develop with my favourite APIs (Qt, OpenGL, and OpenSceneGraph) under a
>
"RM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Of course, the licensing terms may still be too restrictive for those
> that want to create comercial closed source applications and can't
> afford the comercial license of Qt. That is why, for many, wxPython
> will remain the pre
Of course, the licensing terms may still be too restrictive for those
that want to create comercial closed source applications and can't
afford the comercial license of Qt. That is why, for many, wxPython
will remain the preferred choice.
Being that you are inclined use Xemacs and xterm for your
"so is there already a binary for qt/pyqt/eric3 available or when can i
excpect qt4 to be released? "
I think that pyqt4 is going to be a long way off, obviously further
away than qt4.
i have compiled qt 3.3.3/pyqt 3.1.3 using mingw/vcc6 for windows using
the instructions i linked to in my previo
tc wrote:
Has anyone compiled binaries for qt/pyqt/eric3. i'd really like to try
it. at the moment i work with wxWindows and BoaConstructor which i'm
actually not so happy with. design of gui's with wx is not very
efficient...
so is there already a binary for qt/pyqt/eric3 available or when can i
e
tc wrote:
> Has anyone compiled binaries for qt/pyqt/eric3. i'd really like to
try
> it. at the moment i work with wxWindows and BoaConstructor which i'm
> actually not so happy with. design of gui's with wx is not very
> efficient...
>
> so is there already a binary for qt/pyqt/eric3 available or
Has anyone compiled binaries for qt/pyqt/eric3. i'd really like to try
it. at the moment i work with wxWindows and BoaConstructor which i'm
actually not so happy with. design of gui's with wx is not very
efficient...
so is there already a binary for qt/pyqt/eric3 available or when can i
excpect qt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've narrowed down my toolkit selection for my project to wxPython and
> pyQt, and now i'd like to hear any opinions, war stories, peeves, etc,
> about them, particularly from anyone who's used _both_toolkits_. I'm
> only mildly interested in the IDEs and UI designers fo
I used to be a wxPython lover, but it was mainly due to the crappy PyQt
licensing terms, rather than any merits of wx (although I like the
native LnF).
After trying to do a large-ish project using wxPython, I found that I
was limited by the lack of widgets and the layout system.
My latest project
I have just started using wxPython. I selected it over pyQT for
licensing
reasons. I'm no gui app expert. But that said, I've found the toolkit
approachable and the user community very helpful.
Scott
On Mar 16, 2005, at 9:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've narrowed down my toolkit selection
I've narrowed down my toolkit selection for my project to wxPython and
pyQt, and now i'd like to hear any opinions, war stories, peeves, etc,
about them, particularly from anyone who's used _both_toolkits_. I'm
only mildly interested in the IDEs and UI designers for each, as i
want to do as much as
18 matches
Mail list logo
