Andrew E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > .. > > While in PyQt world, I found these advantages: > > + conceptually vastly superior > > + powerful api/widgets/features > > + fast as hell due to the efficient binding of a quite efficient lib > > + cool tools, that are unicode/translation aware > > + very efficient programming environment/unbeatable productivity > > While this sounds like the average sales talk, I will try to backup > > these > > claims a bit: > > .. > > I've been a wx user since around 1999 and overall I like it. It annoys > me a *lot* sometimes, but as Qt was always prohibitively expensive for > commercial development, it was the only real option. > > The key question from my point of view is: can I write commercial > sell-if-I-want-to applications using Qt? If it is GPL, then I guess > the answer is 'no'?
Yes, you can write commercial apps. It's multi-licensed (commercial, GPL, etc.): you get to pick the license(s) you want to use. Read the licenses. PyQt's licensing follows Qt's very closely, so no real complications there. Note PyQt (including a Qt license for use only with PyQt) is actually far cheaper than Qt alone (if you buy Blackadder). John -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
