On 2008-11-20, News123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't know aboug gmane.
The UI isn't as fancy as Google's, but it's a way of separating
yourself from the spammers.
> Finding a solution which doesn't penalize gmail users is still
> a good idea I think.
Of course. One problem is that Goog
Hi,
Grant Edwards wrote:
> . . . It does penalizes legitimate users who post
> from Google Groups. They've made the choice to use the same
> posting conduit as spammers, and presumably they know the
> consequences.
Hmm I made the chooice to use google groups because sometimes I like to
write
On 2008-11-19, Shawn Milochik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the time there was a lot of chatter on the list about
> people "plonking" posts from Google Groups. That's "a"
> solution, if that's where the spam comes from, but it
> penalizes the legitimate users who don't subscribe to the
> mailing
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:23 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With some help from the python.org postmasters over the weekend I figured
> out why some seemingly obvious spam messages seem to be making it to the
> python-list@python.org mailing list. Messages gatewayed from Usenet don't
> pass th
On Nov 18, 10:23 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With some help from the python.org postmasters over the weekend I figured
> out why some seemingly obvious spam messages seem to be making it to the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Messages gatewayed from Usenet don't
> pass through the spam filter
With some help from the python.org postmasters over the weekend I figured
out why some seemingly obvious spam messages seem to be making it to the
python-list@python.org mailing list. Messages gatewayed from Usenet don't
pass through the spam filters. Mailman simply distributes them. There is
st
