Op 15-06-2021 om 19:14 schreef Grant Edwards:
On 2021-06-15, Menno Holscher wrote:
There is no difference regarding security concerns.
I find that hard to believe given the long list of CVEs I've just had
to sort through for even fairly recent versions of PHP. I just can't
belive that Python
On 2021-06-15, Menno Holscher wrote:
> There is no difference regarding security concerns.
I find that hard to believe given the long list of CVEs I've just had
to sort through for even fairly recent versions of PHP. I just can't
belive that Python has anywhere close to that many secruity issues
Op 14-06-2021 om 21:17 schreef Pascal B via Python-list:
Hi,
I would like to know if for a small app for instance that requires a connection
to a remote server database if php is more suitable than Python mainly
regarding security.
Php requires one port for http and one port for the connection
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 08:39:51AM +1200, dn via Python-list wrote:
> On 15/06/2021 07.17, Pascal B via Python-list wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I would like to know if for a small app for instance that requires a
> > connection to a remote server database if php is more suitable than Python
> > mainly reg
On 15/06/2021 07.17, Pascal B via Python-list wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to know if for a small app for instance that requires a
> connection to a remote server database if php is more suitable than Python
> mainly regarding security.
> Php requires one port for http and one port for the connect
Hi,
I would like to know if for a small app for instance that requires a connection
to a remote server database if php is more suitable than Python mainly
regarding security.
Php requires one port for http and one port for the connection to the database
open. If using Python with a tkinter gui,
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 3:08:15 AM UTC-7, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
> Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a
> browser - it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own wi
On 10 October 2017 at 16:07, oliver wrote:
> Can you elaborate what is not sufficient with Qt's web components?
I can't, sorry. Douglas was resurrecting a thread from a year ago. At
the time I was trying to do a quick proof of concept project and asked
for help on here. The project never really w
Can you elaborate what is not sufficient with Qt's web components?
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/topics-web-content.html. This allows for HTML, CSS,
Javascript, via either native C++ Qt, QML, or Python (PyQt) or mixtures of
these 3. That said, I have not yet used Qt`s web engine so I don`t know how
full-fe
Paul Moore said :
> On 9 October 2017 at 04:25, wrote:
>> Did you find out the answer for that?
>
> Nothing much beyond the pointer to PyQt (which basically said "a lot
> of the info on the web is out of date" so I should check the latest
> docs). I didn't take it much further, though, as it w
On 9 October 2017 at 04:25, wrote:
> Did you find out the answer for that?
Nothing much beyond the pointer to PyQt (which basically said "a lot
of the info on the web is out of date" so I should check the latest
docs). I didn't take it much further, though, as it was a hobby
project and the lear
Did you find out the answer for that?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i want to create a very simple python plugin using QT designer but i an not
sure how to connect my variable from gui to my python script.
my gui is simple have only one lineEdit and ok or cancel.
in the gui (widget):
20
90
171
31
def run(self):
sel
On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:54:09 UTC+1, Mark Summerfield wrote:
>
> Since the application is a web app have you looked at:
> https://github.com/r0x0r/pywebview + https://github.com/dddomodossola/remi
> or at
> https://flexx.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> These basically wrap the platform's web
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 11:08:15 AM UTC+1, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
> Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a
> browser - it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own w
On 19 October 2016 at 12:10, Phil Thompson wrote:
> The Chrome-based QWebEngineView (http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qwebengineview.html)
> is fully supported by PyQt.
Nice. Thanks for the pointer. Looks like the various bits of advice I
found on the web are a little out of date, is all.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Le 19/10/2016 à 12:07, Paul Moore a écrit :
I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a browser
- it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own window rather
than in a standard
On 19 Oct 2016, at 11:07 am, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
> Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a
> browser - it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own window
> rather than
I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a browser
- it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own window rather
than in a standard browser window. I'm looking for advice on a g
On Saturday, April 2, 2016 at 1:20:52 PM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> A. ElKader wrote:
>
> > I posted this question, no reply :
> >
> > Any advice :
> >
> > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/273573/write-to-terminal-in-tkinter-gui
>
> I do not think that this newsgroup/maili
A. ElKader wrote:
> I posted this question, no reply :
>
> Any advice :
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/273573/write-to-terminal-in-tkinter-gui
I do not think that this newsgroup/mailing list is meant as an advertisement
board to get your questions answered on Q&A forums on the Web
I posted this question, no reply :
Any advice :
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/273573/write-to-terminal-in-tkinter-gui
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> I don't like it when you can D&D to position things. I don't understand why
> someone wouldn't want to write the positioning code, and have fun with the
> debugging. That's the best part about writing a program, in my opinion. I'm
> against D&D with programming, and I'm not sure why.
I don't
On 2014-03-04 02:41, Rolando wrote:> On Monday, March 3, 2014 6:06:22 PM
UTC-8, MRAB wrote:
>> On 2014-03-04 01:33, Rolando wrote:
>> > I have a GUI with a bunch of cells which is my "View" in the MVC
>> > design. The user enters some information in the view and I pass
>> > this on to the mode
On Monday, March 3, 2014 6:06:22 PM UTC-8, MRAB wrote:
> On 2014-03-04 01:33, Rolando wrote:
>
> > I have a GUI with a bunch of cells which is my "View" in the MVC
>
> > design. The user enters some information in the view and I pass this
>
> > on to the model so that using the information en
On 2014-03-04 01:33, Rolando wrote:
> I have a GUI with a bunch of cells which is my "View" in the MVC
> design. The user enters some information in the view and I pass this
> on to the model so that using the information entered by the user
> it(model) can do some processing.
>
> I have coded up
I have a GUI with a bunch of cells which is my "View" in the MVC design. The
user enters some information in the view and I pass this on to the model so
that using the information entered by the user it(model) can do some processing.
I have coded up my model as a state machine. Wherein, once a f
On 2013-09-20 19:34, Metallicow wrote:
I prefer wx over qt for these reasons.
Robin works for qt now. *Funny isn't it...*
Lying about someone's employment is not very funny. Robin does not work for "Qt"
or even Digia, the nearest thing to a corporate "owner" of Qt these days.
https://www.
On 09/20/2013 01:58 PM, Metallicow wrote:
> Sorry about that, nokia is/was. qt was developed(IIRC) for phones.
> Someone made money. And a lot of it. wx is a more or less a "free"
> project. I don't use a phone anymore. If I had a touch screen phone
> and was a developer, I still wouldn't use one.
Sorry about that, nokia is/was.
qt was developed(IIRC) for phones. Someone made money. And a lot of it.
wx is a more or less a "free" project.
I don't use a phone anymore. If I had a touch screen phone and was a developer,
I still wouldn't use one. I have my many reasons why...
--
https://mail.py
On 09/20/2013 12:34 PM, Metallicow wrote:
> I prefer wx over qt for these reasons. Robin works for qt now. *Funny
> isn't it...* Basically, To change qt(PySide) you need to pretty much
> need to be employed by qt, not the case with wx(is not a *For
> profit*, but you can donate.). In my opinion, in
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:55:59 PM UTC-5, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> There are a few known GUI toolkits out there, and the main ones from what I
> can tell are:
>
>
>
> Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
>
> PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
>
> PyGTK -- Gno
On Friday, September 13, 2013 10:31:17 AM UTC-7, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> I don't like the idea of being able to drag and drop anything in the
> programming world. Outside of that, I use D&D programs a lot. I got into GUI
> programming because I thought that I could get away from them, but I guess
>
On 09/17/2013 10:19 AM, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
> Sure. Every platform provides its own GUI library (Cocoa on Mac OS X,
> Win32 on Windows). Other programs that want to hook into yours, such
> as screen readers, are familiar with the platform's native GUI
> elements- it knows what a Win32 combo box
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:51 AM, rusi wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:49:28 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:55 AM, rusi wrote:
>>
>> > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> The main difference be
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:49:28 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:55 AM, rusi wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>
> >
> >> The main difference between wx and qt is that qt looks native on every
> >> pla
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:55 AM, rusi wrote:
> On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>
>> The main difference between wx and qt is that qt looks native on every
>> platform
>> while wx *is* native on every platform (it uses native controls wherever
>> possib
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
> The main difference between wx and qt is that qt looks native on every
> platform
> while wx *is* native on every platform (it uses native controls wherever
> possible). This means that wx integrates into the OS bett
On 2013-09-14, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> If much of the code for a GUI is boiler-plate, busy-code etc. than I
> would suggest that the framework is not really as efficient as it
> should be.
There are very few Python GUI frameworks as such. They are almost all
just toolkits, not fram
> As complexity rises, though, I'd rather just code the creative parts
> of things, and not busy-code, which is what gui code becomes. Much
> of it is boiler-plate, cut and pasted, etc.
If much of the code for a GUI is boiler-plate, busy-code etc. than I
would suggest that the framework is not re
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:54 PM, wrote:
> Also, this thread hasn't been a troll. I'm completely serious. Why is it when
> I ask things like this people think I'm trolling?? :(
This is python-list. We're used to duck-typing. If it looks like a
file, we can write to it... if it looks like a troll
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 2:23:03 AM UTC+1, Ben Finney wrote:
> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>
>
>
> > But is it efficient to use an axe?
>
>
>
> Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or efficiency?
>
>
>
> > Is it sensible to use an axe when there is a chainsaw? No.
>
>
On 09/13/2013 12:23 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, September 13, 2013 4:02:42 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie
> wrote:
>> On 09/12/2013 10:03 AM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote: I think your
>> hate of gui designers is about 10 years out of date now, even if
>> you still prefer not to use them.
>
On 13/9/2013 15:37, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded that
> way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even)
> debugging.
>
> Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
> someth
eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
> But is it efficient to use an axe?
Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or efficiency?
> Is it sensible to use an axe when there is a chainsaw? No.
Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or sensibility?
> Eventually, everyone will be using
But is it efficient to use an axe? Is it sensible to use an axe when there is a
chainsaw? No. Eventually, everyone will be using chainsaws, and no one will be
using axes. This is my point: to have fun and be productive, but apparently
it's not possible.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:37:03 -0700, eamonnrea wrote:
> I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded
> that way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days
> even) debugging.
>
> Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
> so
On Friday, September 13, 2013 8:50:13 PM UTC+1, Joe Junior wrote:
> On 13 September 2013 16:37, wrote:
>
> > I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded
> > that way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even)
> > debugging.
>
> >
>
> > Well,
On Friday, September 13, 2013 8:56:15 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-09-13, Joe Junior wrote:
>
> > On 13 September 2013 15:39, John Gordon wrote:
>
> >> In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com>
>
> >> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>
> >>> they're making programming e
On 2013-09-13, Joe Junior wrote:
> On 13 September 2013 15:39, John Gordon wrote:
>> In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com>
>> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>>> they're making programming easier... by not coding as much.
>>> Oh well, guess coding is dead :(
>>
>> Pressing keys o
On 13 September 2013 16:37, wrote:
> I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded that
> way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even)
> debugging.
>
> Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
> something else to
On 9/13/2013 9:27 AM, Kevin Walzer wrote:
On 9/11/13 4:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
With the themed widget introduced in Tk 8.5, Tkinter is now a peer to
the other GUI toolkits in most respects, surpasses them in some (canvas
widget), and lags behind
I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded that
way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even) debugging.
Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
something else to do with my life.
--
https://mail.python.org/mai
On 13 September 2013 15:39, John Gordon wrote:
> In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com>
> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> they're making programming easier... by not coding as much. Oh well,
>> guess coding is dead :(
>
> Pressing keys on a keyboard was never the hard part of
In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com> eamonn...@gmail.com
writes:
> they're making programming easier... by not coding as much. Oh well,
> guess coding is dead :(
Pressing keys on a keyboard was never the hard part of coding.
--
John Gordon A is for Amy,
On Friday, September 13, 2013 4:02:42 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 10:03 AM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
>I think your hate of gui designers is about 10 years out of date now,
> even if you still prefer not to use them.
So, you are recommending not to code as much? :'( That is w
Enthought.traits !! http://code.enthought.com/projects/traits/
I started using traits a couple of months ago and I really like it.
Traits provides a framework which creates a UI based on your data structures.
Using some "hints" you can do anything you want. Just check out their website
and try t
I don't like the idea of being able to drag and drop anything in the
programming world. Outside of that, I use D&D programs a lot. I got into GUI
programming because I thought that I could get away from them, but I guess not.
Maybe I'm against them because if I can't code, I don't have anything
On 9/11/13 4:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
With the themed widget introduced in Tk 8.5, Tkinter is now a peer to
the other GUI toolkits in most respects, surpasses them in some (canvas
widget), and lags behind in just two areas: printing (several
pla
> Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
>
> PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
As others have pointed out, that's nonsensical. If you don't like the GUI
designer, just don't use it.
> wxPython -- Very nice, very professional, approved by Python creator, but
> a
On 09/12/2013 09:39 PM, Peter wrote:
> I stuck with Tkinter combined with PMW for a very long time, but the
> lack of extra widgets finally drove me to look elsewhere.
>
> I tried PyQT but didn't have a good experience. I can't remember
> details, but things just seemed to have little "gotchas" -
I stuck with Tkinter combined with PMW for a very long time, but the lack of
extra widgets finally drove me to look elsewhere.
I tried PyQT but didn't have a good experience. I can't remember details, but
things just seemed to have little "gotchas" - which the mailing list were very
helpful wit
On 09/12/2013 09:02 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> In any event I think you should give both Glade-3 and Qt Designer a
> serious look. I think your hate of gui designers is about 10 years out
> of date now, even if you still prefer not to use them.
This is a bit old but still how Qt works:
http://t
On 09/12/2013 10:03 AM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I didn't realise GTK has a GUI designer too :(
>
> I don't like it when you can D&D to position things. I don't
> understand why someone wouldn't want to write the positioning code,
> and have fun with the debugging. That's the best part about w
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:05:14 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
>
>
>
> What do you mean? Gtk has a GUI designer too. what of it?
>
>
>
> > I, personally, real
On 2013-09-12 17:03, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:05:14 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly. I know Qt and Gtk both can flip the button orders, etc to
look more native. And all good toolkits give you lay
On 2013-09-12, Robert Kern wrote:
> There is nothing forcing you to use the GUI designers if you don't want to.
There's also a markup language available, enaml:
http://docs.enthought.com/enaml/
Dave Cook
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013-09-12, Dave Cook wrote:
> There's also a markup language available, enaml:
>
> http://docs.enthought.com/enaml/
I should have mentioned that it's *Python*-based markup, not an XML
horrorshow.
http://pyvideo.org/video/1231/enaml-a-framework-for-building-declarative-user
Dave Cook
--
htt
On Sep 12, 2013 9:06 AM, wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:05:14 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
> >
> > What do you mean? Gtk has a GUI designer too. what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/13 21:55, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> There are a few known GUI toolkits out there, and the main ones
> from what I can tell are:
>
> Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited PyQT -- You have a GUI
> designer, so I'm not going to count that PyG
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, wrote:
> Have you got anything to say on what one I should be using(excluding PyQT
> because it has a D&D designer >:( )? Is Tkinter really dead? Should I stick
> with wxPython?
If that's a reason for excluding a GUI toolkit, you're in trouble.
Drag and drop la
On 2013-09-12, Michael Torrie wrote:
> Not me. wxWidgets' event model is way too MFC-esque for me. Does it
> still use event numbers that you define? Shudder.
You don't have to define IDs explicitly. That's been the case for a
long time.
> Gtk and Qt's method of signals and slots is by far t
On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
What do you mean? Gtk has a GUI designer too. what of it?
> I, personally, really like wxPython, but I also really like Tkinter.
> I've messed with PyGTK, but I'd choose wxPython
There are a few known GUI toolkits out there, and the main ones from what I can
tell are:
Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
PyGTK -- Gnome officially back this I think
wxPython -- Very nice, very professional, approved by Python
Hi everybody,
I have a Python GUI that displays some data in labeled fields. As new data
comes in the fields clear and the old data is lost. I need to make a text box
in the GUI that will display the cleared data in a scrolling list. I also need
this scrolling list to be logged to a file in
On 19.03.2013 21:01, maiden129 wrote:
Hello,
I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show the of occurrences of
the character in the string in Tkinter.
My questions are:
How can I make an empty Entry object that will hold a word that a user will
enter?
How to make an empty Entr
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:21:06 PM UTC-5, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/19/2013 10:16 PM, Ranting Rick wrote:
> > [snip code]
>
> when I run this, and click the button, I get:
>
>TypeError: cbButton() missing 1 required positional argument: 'self'
>
> ...when I remove 'self' from cbButton, I
On 3/19/2013 10:16 PM, Ranting Rick wrote:
import tkinter as tk
from tkinter.constants import LEFT
def cbButton(self):
print('I should do something here!')
root = tk.Tk()
root.title("Window")
w=tk.Label(root, text="Enter a string")
w.pack(side=LEFT)
e1 = tk.Entry(root, bd=5)
e1.pack(side=L
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:36:28 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
> So should I redo my other code that I created with
> the radioButtons to change the colors of a text?
I believe so. Although you really should explain what your trying to achieve
with this code. There is nothing wrong with wrapping
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:16:25 PM UTC-4, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Mar 19, 8:25 pm, maiden129 wrote:
So should I redo my other code that I created with the radioButtons to change
the colors of a text?
from tkinter import *
class buttons:
def __init__(self):
window = Tk()
On Mar 19, 8:25 pm, maiden129 wrote:
> Here is my try to answer some of questions:
>
> [snip code]
I don't understand why you are wrapping this code into a class. Are
you trying to create something reuseable?
> I'm just struggling with only how to create an object that
> will hold a single chara
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, maiden129 wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:57:42 PM UTC-4, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show
> >
> > > the of occ
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:57:42 PM UTC-4, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show
>
> > the of occurrences of the character in the string in
>
> > Tkinter.
>
> >
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show
> the of occurrences of the character in the string in
> Tkinter.
>
> My questions are:
>
> How can I make an empty Entry object that will hold a word
> that a use
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:39:51 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:01 AM, maiden129 wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show the of
> > occurrences of the character in the string in Tkinter.
>
>
>
> This sounds like
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:01 AM, maiden129 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show the of occurrences
> of the character in the string in Tkinter.
This sounds like homework. Have you had a try at it yourself before
asking? If so, show us your code, and point
Hello,
I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show the of occurrences of
the character in the string in Tkinter.
My questions are:
How can I make an empty Entry object that will hold a word that a user will
enter?
How to make an empty Entry object that will hold a single charact
On Friday, January 25, 2013 8:34:16 AM UTC-8, Alex wrote:
> Hello, does python have capabilities to display a spatial image and read the
> coordinates from it? If so, what modules or extension do I need to achieve
> that? I'll appreciate any help.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
Try basemap: http
Hello, does python have capabilities to display a spatial image and read the
coordinates from it? If so, what modules or extension do I need to achieve
that? I'll appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 7/24/2011 8:51 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
Now replying to an existing thread to start an entirely new, unrelated
thread is definitely rude.
Rude or not, it tends to be unproductive. If someone posted "Help with
threading internals" here, it could well not be seen by the appropriate
people,
On 2011-07-24, John Nagle wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 7:34 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: RIPEMD160
>>
>> There's PyGUI, which, at a glance, fits whit what you want. Looks like
>> it uses OpenGL and native GUI facilities.
>> http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ew
On 07/20/2011 07:17 PM, rantingrick wrote:
> Please everyone, do not change the subject of someone's thread
> because it's considered rude. Thank you.
Too funny. Says who? Changing the subject line to reflect the
direction this part of the thread (a branch if you will) is going is
definitely ap
John Nagle wrote:
There's PyGUI, which, at a glance, fits whit what you want. Looks like
it uses OpenGL and native GUI facilities.
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/python_gui/
It still uses Tcl/Tk stuff, which is un-Pythonic.
You must be thinking of something else. My PyGUI has
Gregory Ewing wrote:
>Tim Roberts wrote:
>>
>> I don't think your glibness is justified. There is a legitimate appeal to
>> this notion. The fact is that MANY APIs can be completely and adequately
>> described by HTML.
>
>My brain raises a TypeError on that statement. According to
>my understa
t;
> > 4. They might look bad (Tkinter, Swing with Jython).
>
> > 5. All projects to write a Python GUI toolkit die before they are
> > finished. (General lack of interest, bindings for Qt or wxWidgets
> > bloatware are mature, momentum for web development etc.)
>
> G
On 7/19/2011 7:34 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
There's PyGUI, which, at a glance, fits whit what you want. Looks like
it uses OpenGL and native GUI facilities.
http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/greg.ewing/python_gui/
It has quite a few external depend
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano, 20.07.2011 06:28:
>
> Python has a GIL.
>>>
>>
>> Except for Jython, IronPython and PyPy.
>>
>
> PyPy has a GIL, too.
There's been talk of removing PyPy's GIL using transactional memory though.
--
http://mail.python.org
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> And then you have the cross platform nirvana. Except for the browsers'
> various differences and bugs etc etc...
>
The "platform" ceases to be Windows/Linux/Mac, ceases to be Qt/GTK/Tk,
and instead becomes Webkit/Gecko/Trident. It's still
On 23Jul2011 22:21, Gregory Ewing wrote:
| Tim Roberts wrote:
| >Gregory Ewing wrote:
| >>sturlamolden wrote:
| >>>Or should modern deskop apps be written with something completely
| >>>different, such as HTML5?
| >>
| >>I hope not! HTML is great for web pages, but not
| >>everything should be a
Tim Roberts wrote:
Gregory Ewing wrote:
sturlamolden wrote:
Or should modern deskop apps be written with something completely
different, such as HTML5?
I hope not! HTML is great for web pages, but not
everything should be a web page.
I don't think your glibness is justified. There is a
1 - 100 of 465 matches
Mail list logo
