Alex Strickland wrote:
> On 2012/10/15 03:05 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
>
>> This actually came as a surprise to me, I assumed that using b'' I could
>> portably create a byte string (which is true) and using u'' I could
>> portably create a unicode string (which is not true). This feature would
On 15.10.12 16:05, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
I need a little nudge in the right direction, as I'm misunderstanding
something concerning string literals in Python 2 and 3. In Python 2.7,
b'' and '' are byte strings, while u'' is a unicode literal. In Python
3.2, b'' is a byte string and '' is a unico
On 2012/10/15 03:05 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
This actually came as a surprise to me, I assumed that using b'' I could
portably create a byte string (which is true) and using u'' I could
portably create a unicode string (which is not true). This feature would
help porting code between both vers
On 10/15/2012 09:05 AM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I need a little nudge in the right direction, as I'm misunderstanding
> something concerning string literals in Python 2 and 3. In Python 2.7,
> b'' and '' are byte strings, while u'' is a unicode literal. In Python
> 3.2, b'' is a byte strin
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:05:01 +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I need a little nudge in the right direction, as I'm misunderstanding
> something concerning string literals in Python 2 and 3. In Python 2.7,
> b'' and '' are byte strings, while u'' is a unicode literal. In Python
> 3.2, b'' i
Hi!
I need a little nudge in the right direction, as I'm misunderstanding
something concerning string literals in Python 2 and 3. In Python 2.7,
b'' and '' are byte strings, while u'' is a unicode literal. In Python
3.2, b'' is a byte string and '' is a unicode literal, while u'' is a
syntax
