On 2012/10/15 03:05 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
This actually came as a surprise to me, I assumed that using b'' I could portably create a byte string (which is true) and using u'' I could portably create a unicode string (which is not true). This feature would help porting code between both versions. While this is a state I can live with, I wonder what the rationale for this is.!puzzled thanks
u'' is legal in 3.3 again. -- Regards Alex -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
