Alex Strickland <s...@mweb.co.za> wrote: > On 2012/10/15 03:05 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > >> This actually came as a surprise to me, I assumed that using b'' I could >> portably create a byte string (which is true) and using u'' I could >> portably create a unicode string (which is not true). This feature would >> help porting code between both versions. While this is a state I can >> live with, I wonder what the rationale for this is. >> >> !puzzled thanks > > u'' is legal in 3.3 again. > and if you want it to work in 3.1 and 3.2 there is the uprefix import hook: https://bitbucket.org/vinay.sajip/uprefix
-- Duncan Booth http://kupuguy.blogspot.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
