Remember us? It's your friendly CPython release team and we have something
we think you may like: The new alpha release of Python 3.10 is here, now
with 100% more pattern matching. If I were you, I would download it and
start playing with it. Extra points if you report us any bugs you find
Remember us? It's your friendly CPython release team and we have something
we think you may like: The new alpha release of Python 3.10 is here, now
with 100% more pattern matching. If I were you, I would download it and
start playing with it. Extra points if you report us any bugs you find
I've started writing some asyncio code in lieu of using threads and
managing concurrency and primitives manually.
Having spent a lot of time using c#'s async implementation, I am struggling
to see an elegant pattern for implementing cancellation. With the necessity
for the loop (that
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2018-11-07, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>> lampahome wrote:
>>
>>> Above is I thought to make code clear, and this pattern is called simple
>>> factory?
>
> [...]
>
>>> *Is there better design pattern f
On 2018-11-07, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> lampahome wrote:
>
>> Above is I thought to make code clear, and this pattern is called simple
>> factory?
[...]
>> *Is there better design pattern for me?*
> Generally speaking you get better solutions when
>
>
> The rest is just cruft ;)
> >
> > *Is there better design pattern for me?*
>
> If A does B to C, is that a crime?
>
No
> Your problem description suffers from overgeneralisation.
>
> Generally speaking you get better solutions when you ask yours
lampahome wrote:
> Above is I thought to make code clear, and this pattern is called simple
> factory?
This is a factory function:
> def get_class(obj):
> if obj == 'A1' or obj == 'A2':
> return A(obj)
> else:
> return B(obj)
)
# B = get_class(B2)
-
Above is I thought to make code clear, and this pattern is called simple
factory?
*Is there better design pattern for me?*
thanks
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2018-08-28 00:58, Malcolm wrote:
On 28/08/2018 7:09 AM, John Pote wrote:
On 26/08/2018 00:55, Malcolm wrote:
I am trying to understand why regex is not extracting all of the
characters between two delimiters.
The complete string is the xmp IFD data extracted from a .CR2 image
file.
I do
On 28/08/2018 7:09 AM, John Pote wrote:
On 26/08/2018 00:55, Malcolm wrote:
I am trying to understand why regex is not extracting all of the
characters between two delimiters.
The complete string is the xmp IFD data extracted from a .CR2 image
file.
I do have a work around, but it's messy a
On 26/08/2018 00:55, Malcolm wrote:
I am trying to understand why regex is not extracting all of the
characters between two delimiters.
The complete string is the xmp IFD data extracted from a .CR2 image file.
I do have a work around, but it's messy and possibly not future proof.
Do you mean f
On 08/25/2018 04:55 PM, Malcolm wrote:
I am trying to understand why regex is not extracting all of the
characters between two delimiters.
The complete string is the xmp IFD data extracted from a .CR2 image file.
I do have a work around, but it's messy and possibly not future proof.
Any insig
I am trying to understand why regex is not extracting all of the
characters between two delimiters.
The complete string is the xmp IFD data extracted from a .CR2 image file.
I do have a work around, but it's messy and possibly not future proof.
Any insight greatly appreciated.
Malcolm
My tes
I asked this before but my Usenet reader only saves messages for 30
days. I still can't get the pattern for this chart.
I started working on the code that should print it, but I never
remembered how to do it.
empire={6:"Infantry",12:"Armor/Fighter",30:"Trans
Thank you all for thoughtful excellent updates!
Aldi
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 17:37:00 +0100, MRAB wrote:
> On 2018-07-21 15:20, aldi.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a long text, which tells me which files from a database were
>> downloaded and which ones failed. The pattern is as follows (at the end of
>> this post)
MRAB wrote:
> On 2018-07-21 15:20, aldi.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a long text, which tells me which files from a database were
>> downloaded and which ones failed. The pattern is as follows (at the end
>> of this post). Wrote a tiny program, but still is
On 2018-07-21 15:20, aldi.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a long text, which tells me which files from a database were downloaded and which
ones failed. The pattern is as follows (at the end of this post). Wrote a tiny program,
but still is raw. I want to find term "ERROR" and
Hi,
I have a long text, which tells me which files from a database were downloaded
and which ones failed. The pattern is as follows (at the end of this post).
Wrote a tiny program, but still is raw. I want to find term "ERROR" and go 5
lines above and get the name with suffix XPT, in
hart but I no longer can
>>figure out programming or math.
>>Anyone care to figure out the pattern and make a new copy of the
>>chart?
>>
>>https://imgur.com/a/thF6U43
>
>
>I don't remember how I did it.
>It is from the game Empire. There is a new versi
figure out the pattern and make a new copy of the
>chart?
>
>https://imgur.com/a/thF6U43
I don't remember how I did it.
It is from the game Empire. There is a new version of it on Steam
called Empire Deluxe Combined Edition.
I played the game relentlessly from the 90s until I upgraded
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 17:16:21 -0400, no@none.invalid wrote:
[snip]
> Anyone care to figure out the pattern and make a new copy of the
> chart?
>
> https://imgur.com/a/thF6U43
I've only looked at infantry and carrier, but those two seem to be
fairly well approximated by y = a + 1
hart but I no longer can
>>figure out programming or math.
>>Anyone care to figure out the pattern and make a new copy of the
>>chart?
>>
>>https://imgur.com/a/thF6U43
>
>
>I don't remember how I did it.
>It is from the game Empire. There is a new versi
th and programming.
>>>> I would like to have a new print out of this chart but I no longer can
>>>> figure out programming or math.
>>>> Anyone care to figure out the pattern and make a new copy of the
>>>> chart?
>>>>
>>>>
AM, wrote:
> >> This is a chart I made using BASIC back in the 90s when I could still
> >> do math and programming.
> >> I would like to have a new print out of this chart but I no longer can
> >> figure out programming or math.
> >> Anyone care to fig
ure out programming or math.
>> Anyone care to figure out the pattern and make a new copy of the
>> chart?
>>
>> https://imgur.com/a/thF6U43
>
> Oh that looks like fun! Some sort of game analysis, I presume.
> Unfortunately I don't see enough info there
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 7:16 AM, wrote:
> This is a chart I made using BASIC back in the 90s when I could still
> do math and programming.
> I would like to have a new print out of this chart but I no longer can
> figure out programming or math.
> Anyone care to figure out the pat
This is a chart I made using BASIC back in the 90s when I could still
do math and programming.
I would like to have a new print out of this chart but I no longer can
figure out programming or math.
Anyone care to figure out the pattern and make a new copy of the
chart?
https://imgur.com/a/thF6U43
o put in print() calls at various
places, eg:
print("iterate over traing_data =", repr(training_data))
for pattern in training_data:
# tokenize each word in the sentence
print("pattern =", repr(pattern))
w = nltk.word_tokenize(pattern['sentence']
TC+5:30, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 14Jun2018 20:01, Sharan Basappa wrote:
> >> >Can anyone explain to me the purpose of "pattern" in the line below:
> >> >
> >> >documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
> >> >
> >> &g
On 14Jun2018 20:01, Sharan Basappa wrote:
>Can anyone explain to me the purpose of "pattern" in the line below:
>
>documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
>
>documents is declared as a list as follows:
>documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
No
> >Can anyone explain to me the purpose of "pattern" in the line below:
> >
> >documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
> >
> >documents is declared as a list as follows:
> >documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
>
> Not with
On 13Jun2018 19:51, Sharan Basappa wrote:
Can anyone explain to me the purpose of "pattern" in the line below:
documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
documents is declared as a list as follows:
documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
Not without a lot more co
Can anyone explain to me the purpose of "pattern" in the line below:
documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
documents is declared as a list as follows:
documents.append((w, pattern['class']))
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On Behalf Of MRAB
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 12:05 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Python regex pattern from array of hex chars
> Use re.escape:
>
> regex = re.compile('[^{}]+'.format(re.escape(''.join
On 2018-04-13 18:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have an array of hex chars which designate required characters.
and one happens to be \x5C or "\". What foo is required to build the
pattern to exclude all but:
regex = re.compile('[^{}]+'.format(''.join(c for c in c
I have an array of hex chars which designate required characters.
and one happens to be \x5C or "\". What foo is required to build the
pattern to exclude all but:
regex = re.compile('[^{}]+'.format(''.join(c for c in character_class)))
I would use that in a re.sub t
On 27/03/18 22:02, Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
But when it's exactly what you need, why do
you need to shoehorn the expression into 79 characters? Seems pointless
in a case like this. PEP8 is a guideline, not an absolute rule. It's
okay to bend
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 9:37:14 PM UTC-5, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> I can easily get 132+ columns of a font large enough for my
> 52 year old eyes on a 15" laptop.
Well, if you're comfortable with the long lines, fine. But
be aware that long lines are poo-pooed in most professional
enviroments.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Rick Johnson
wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 4:02:37 PM UTC-5, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> > But when it's exactly what you need, why do you need to
>> > shoehorn the expression into 79 characters? Seem
On Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 4:02:37 PM UTC-5, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > But when it's exactly what you need, why do you need to
> > shoehorn the expression into 79 characters? Seems
> > pointless in a case like this. PEP8 is a guideline, n
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> But when it's exactly what you need, why do
> you need to shoehorn the expression into 79 characters? Seems pointless
> in a case like this. PEP8 is a guideline, not an absolute rule. It's
> okay to bend it a bit in cases like this.
I thi
On 03/27/2018 08:17 AM, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Hello Python friends,
>
> How do I split the below regex , so that it fits within the character
> limit of 79 words
>
>
> pattern = [
> r'(?P([0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+::HEAD))
27.03.18 17:17, Ganesh Pal пише:
How do I split the below regex , so that it fits within the character
limit of 79 words
pattern = [
r'(?P([0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+::HEAD))',
r'(?P(owner:\s+[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA
Use re.X - see https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/re.html#re.X for details.
On 27 March 2018 at 15:17, Ganesh Pal wrote:
> Hello Python friends,
>
> How do I split the below regex , so that it fits within the character
> limit of 79 words
>
>
> pattern = [
> r'(?P
Hello Python friends,
How do I split the below regex , so that it fits within the character
limit of 79 words
pattern = [
r'(?P([0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+::HEAD))',
r'(?P(owner:\s+[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-9a-fA-F]+:[0-
On 03/01/2018 10:34 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
After this thread, the term "docstring" is never going
to mean quite the same thing to me again.
I still feel that the following is quite readable:
<--->
import inspect
def snatch(func):
def snatched(self, *arg
After this thread, the term "docstring" is never going
to mean quite the same thing to me again.
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Something like the following might do the trick. As an added benefit,
it's easy to set all the defaults automatically in __init__ as well
without hand-adding "self.dopey = dopey". On the down side, in the
non-__init__ functions, you have to use kwargs["dopey"] and the like.
It also involves tackin
On 02/26/2018 03:41 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
`__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
*optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
parameters. If those arguments are None,
Of course you can do the same without annotations, but with the
introduction of private attribute while your API it is under active
development:
from functools import wraps
def validate(func):
@wraps(func)
def _wrap(self, *args, **kwargs):
variables = self._vars # Here
kw
This validation can be also done with the use of annotations, while I find
it super awful, I put this for one more example:
from functools import wraps
def validate(func):
@wraps(func)
def _wrap(self, *args, **kwargs):
variables = func.__annotations__.keys()
kwargs.update(z
On 26.02.2018 15:41, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
`__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
*optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
parameters. If those arguments are None, the
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> Interesting, I'll certainly have a good read of that, thanks. But I
> fear I mislead you: you seem to have understood that either all the
> parameters are None, or none of them are, whereas what I meant was
> that they can vary independently of each other.
I think that
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 09:15:12 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
>> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned
>> in `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
>> *optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initiali
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:23:39 -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 5:44:18 PM UTC-6, MRAB wrote: [...]
>> Before using or'd-logic, you need to know whether the value could be
>> falsey, e.g. 0.
>
> True. However. Steven failed to provide any info that might help us
> determ
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:39:43 +0100, Peter Otten wrote:
[...]
> I have not yet looked into dataclasses. Don't they handle the __init__()
> part? Anyway, here's my attempt to make spam() less spammy:
I'm not too concerned about __init__, it's only one method :-)
> $ cat attrs_to_args_decorator.p
On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 5:44:18 PM UTC-6, MRAB wrote:
[...]
> Before using or'd-logic, you need to know whether the value
> could be falsey, e.g. 0.
True. However. Steven failed to provide any info that might
help us determine the types of these parameters, and as
such, i was forced to tak
On 2018-02-26 21:12, Rick Johnson wrote:
On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:44:14 AM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have a class with a large number of parameters (about
ten) assigned in `__init__`. The class then has a number of
methods which accept *optional* arguments with the same
names as t
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned
> in `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
> *optional* arguments with the same names as the
> constructor/initialiser parameters. If those arguments are None, the
> defaults
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:09 PM, wrote:
>> def foo(self, *args, **kwargs):
>> assert len(args) == 0
>
> Better:
>
> def foo(self, **kwargs):
>
>> So, use the inspect module to detect the valid arguments
>> from the class initializer
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:09 PM, wrote:
> def foo(self, *args, **kwargs):
> assert len(args) == 0
Better:
def foo(self, **kwargs):
> So, use the inspect module to detect the valid arguments
> from the class initializer. Then use **kwargs in every
> class method. It would be nice if
On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:44:14 AM UTC-6, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about
> ten) assigned in `__init__`. The class then has a number of
> methods which accept *optional* arguments with the same
> names as the constructor/initialiser parameter
On Monday, February 26, 2018 at 3:44:14 PM UTC+1, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
> `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
> *optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
> parame
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:06 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
>> `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
>> *optional* arguments with the same n
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
> `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
> *optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
> parameters. If those arguments are None, the defaults are
On 02/26/2018 07:28 AM, Rhodri James wrote:
On 26/02/18 14:41, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
`__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
*optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
p
On 26/02/18 14:41, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
`__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
*optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
parameters. If those arguments are None, the d
On 26-02-18 15:41, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
> `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
> *optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
> parameters. If those arguments are No
Le 26/02/18 à 15:41, Steven D'Aprano a écrit :
I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
`__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
*optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
parameters. If those arguments are None,
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
> `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
> *optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
> parameters. If those argu
On 26-02-18 15:41, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
> `__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
> *optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
> parameters. If those arguments are No
I have a class with a large number of parameters (about ten) assigned in
`__init__`. The class then has a number of methods which accept
*optional* arguments with the same names as the constructor/initialiser
parameters. If those arguments are None, the defaults are taken from the
instance attr
On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 2:11:53 PM UTC, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> On 23.01.2017 14:28, Soni L. wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23/01/17 11:18 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> >> On 23.01.2017 14:05, Soni L. wrote:
> >>> Yeah but the dotequals operator has many other benefits:
> >>>
> >>> long_name .= __call_
On 23.01.2017 14:28, Soni L. wrote:
>
>
> On 23/01/17 11:18 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>> On 23.01.2017 14:05, Soni L. wrote:
>>> Yeah but the dotequals operator has many other benefits:
>>>
>>> long_name .= __call__ # cast to callable
>>> long_name .= wrapped # unwrap
>>> etc
>>>
>>> And it also
I am looking to see if there is prior work, or design ideas for implementing
pattern-matched guard statements in a very natural format for python
programmers.
For those not familiar with pattern matching in [SCALA][1], [Erlang][2], or
[F#][3]
They all have constructs similiar to:
When
ttps://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-ideas/2014-October/029630.htm
> >>>
> >>> Wanted to know if the above link idea, had been implemented and if
> >>> there's a module that accepts a pattern like 'cap' and give you all
> &g
On 10/09/2016 11:26, Veek 'this_is_not_my_name' M wrote:
Veek 'this_is_not_my_name' M wrote:
/me claps
TJG
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ink idea, had been implemented and if
>>> there's a module that accepts a pattern like 'cap' and give you all
>>> the instances of unicode 'CAP' characters.
>>> ⋂ \bigcap
>>> ⊓ \sqcap
>>> ∩ \cap
>>> ♑ \capricornus
&
From: jlada...@itu.edu
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 7:49:14 PM UTC-7, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:19 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Killfile him and move on...
>
> But but but... I couldn't do that.
>
> https://www.xkcd.com/386/
I strongly suspected it would be that particu
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 7:49:14 PM UTC-7, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:19 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Killfile him and move on...
>
> But but but... I couldn't do that.
>
> https://www.xkcd.com/386/
I strongly suspected it would be that particular XKCD. :^)
--
http
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 7:49:14 PM UTC-7, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:19 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Killfile him and move on...
>
> But but but... I couldn't do that.
>
> https://www.xkcd.com/386/
I strongly suspected it would be that particular XKCD. :^)
--
htt
Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 5:25:48 PM UTC+5:30, Veek. M wrote:
>> https://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-ideas/2014-October/029630.htm
>>
>> Wanted to know if the above link idea, had been implemented and if
>> there's a module that
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 2:15:58 AM UTC-4, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
wrote:
> How can I trust a person
> who does not even have the decency and the courage to stand by their
> statements with their real name?
Feel free to ignore people you don't trust. We'll help them.
--Ned.
--
https
On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 08:15:42 +0200, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>
>> So Veek should be able to appease P.E. by calling himself 'Veek "David
>> Smith" M'.
>
> That would not help. “Veek” might be (the transcription of) a given
> name or a family name, but “Veek M” is not a real name. [Real
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Gregory Ewing wrote:
>
>> Larry Hudson wrote:
>>> If you continue to read this forum, you will quickly learn to ignore
>>> "Pointy-Ears". He rarely has anything worth while to post, and his
>>> unique fetish about Real Names shows him to be a hypocrite as well.
On 09/04/2016 04:22 PM, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Larry Hudson wrote:
>> If you continue to read this forum, you will quickly learn to ignore
>> "Pointy-Ears". He rarely has anything worth while to post, and his
>> unique fetish about Real Names shows him to be a hypocrite as well.
>
> To be fair,
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 7:52:44 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
> FWIW, hex is much more common for displaying Unicode codepoints than
> decimal is. So I'd print it like this (incorporating the 'not CAPITAL'
> filter):
You are right, I went too quickly, and didn't realize until after I
pos
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> But, 'CAP' appears in 'CAPITAL', which gives more than 1800 matches:
>
> >>> for c in range(32, 0x11):
> ... try:
> ... name = unicodedata.name(chr(c))
> ... except ValueError:
> ... continue
> ... if
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 7:55:48 AM UTC-4, Veek. M wrote:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-ideas/2014-October/029630.htm
>
> Wanted to know if the above link idea, had been implemented and if
> there's a module that accepts a pattern like 'cap
Larry Hudson wrote:
If you continue to read this forum, you will quickly learn to ignore
"Pointy-Ears". He rarely has anything worth while to post, and his
unique fetish about Real Names shows him to be a hypocrite as well.
To be fair, it's likely that Thomas Lahn is his real
name, and he's n
On 09/04/2016 09:00 AM, Veek. M wrote:
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 06:53 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
Regarding the name (From field), my name *is* Veek.M […]
Liar. *plonk*
You have crossed a line now Thomas.
That is absolutely uncalled for. You have absolutely no l
Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 06:53 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>
>>> Regarding the name (From field), my name *is* Veek.M […]
>>
>> Liar. *plonk*
>
> You have crossed a line now Thomas.
>
> That is absolutely uncalled for. You have absolutely no legitimate
> reason to b
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 06:53 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Regarding the name (From field), my name *is* Veek.M […]
>
> Liar. *plonk*
You have crossed a line now Thomas.
That is absolutely uncalled for. You have absolutely no legitimate reason to
believe that Veek is not his or her real
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 11:18:07 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 9:32:28 AM UTC+5:30, Veek. M wrote:
> > Regarding the name (From field), my name *is* Veek.M though I tend to
> > shorten it to Vek.M on Google (i think Veek was taken or some such
> > thing
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Steve D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:19 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> [...]
Please either comply, or give up your stupid and pointless obsession with
trying to be the Internet Police for something that isn't even a
On Sunday, September 4, 2016 at 9:32:28 AM UTC+5:30, Veek. M wrote:
> Regarding the name (From field), my name *is* Veek.M though I tend to
> shorten it to Vek.M on Google (i think Veek was taken or some such
> thing). Just to be clear, my parents call me something closely related
> to Veek that
On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 5:25:48 PM UTC+5:30, Veek. M wrote:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-ideas/2014-October/029630.htm
>
> Wanted to know if the above link idea, had been implemented and if
> there's a module that accepts a pattern like 'cap
…
>
>> had been implemented
>
> Probably not.
>
>> and if there's a module that accepts a pattern like 'cap' and give
>> you all the instances of unicode 'CAP' characters.
>
> I do not know any.
>
>> ⋂ \bigcap
>>
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:19 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> [...]
>>> Please either comply, or give up your stupid and pointless obsession with
>>> trying to be the Internet Police for something that isn't even a real
>>> rule.
>>
>> His posts ar
1 - 100 of 898 matches
Mail list logo
