On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 05:30, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
> Rob Cliffe writes:
> >Does that mean that it is not possible to have a (built-in) function
> >that would construct and return a dictionary of all available variables
> >and their values? If it were possible, it could be useful, and there
> >woul
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 02:12, Rob Cliffe wrote:
>
> [re-sending this to both the list and to Chris, as a prior send to the
> list only was bounced back]
> On 31/01/2023 22:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for clarifying.
> >> Hm. So 'x' is neither in locals() nor in globals(). Which star
[re-sending this to both the list and to Chris, as a prior send to the
list only was bounced back]
On 31/01/2023 22:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
Thanks for clarifying.
Hm. So 'x' is neither in locals() nor in globals(). Which starts me
wondering (to go off on a tangent): Should there be a nonlo
On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 09:14, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
> With great respect, Chris, isn't it for the OP (or anyone else) to
> decide - having been warned of the various drawbacks and limitations -
> to decide if it's a terrible idea *for him*? He's entitled to decide
> that it's just what
On 27/01/2023 23:41, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 10:08, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!
I appreciate the points you are making, Chris, but I am a bit taken
aback by such forceful language.
The exact same points have already been made, but not listened to.
On 2023-01-29 10:18:00 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> Am 29.01.23 um 05:27 schrieb Thomas Passin:
> > IOW, perhaps there is a more practical way to accomplish what you want.
> > Except that we don't know what that is.
>
> Well, I don't know. I pretty much want a generic Python mechanism that
> all
On 1/29/2023 6:09 AM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 28.01.23 um 02:56 schrieb Thomas Passin:
On 1/27/2023 5:10 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 27.01.23 um 21:43 schrieb Johannes Bauer:
I don't understand why you fully ignore literally the FIRST example
I gave in my original post and angril
Am 29.01.23 um 05:27 schrieb Thomas Passin:
Well, yes, we do see that. What we don't see is what you want to
accomplish by doing it, and why you don't seem willing to accept some
restrictions on the string fragments so that they will evaluate correctly.
I'll have to accept the restrictions.
Am 28.01.23 um 02:56 schrieb Thomas Passin:
On 1/27/2023 5:10 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 27.01.23 um 21:43 schrieb Johannes Bauer:
I don't understand why you fully ignore literally the FIRST example I
gave in my original post and angrily claim that you solution works
when it does not:
Am 29.01.23 um 02:09 schrieb Chris Angelico:
The exact same points have already been made, but not listened to.
Sometimes, forceful language is required in order to get people to
listen.
An arrogant bully's rationale. Personally, I'm fine with it. I've been
to Usenet for a long time, in which
On 2023-01-29 15:47:47 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 14:36, Stefan Ram wrote:
> > (This message was written for Usenet. If you read it in a
> > mailing list or the Web, it has been stolen from Usenet.)
>
> I'm curious as to the copyright protections available to you, b
On 1/28/2023 2:50 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
Am 28.01.23 um 02:51 schrieb Thomas Passin:
This is literally the version I described myself, except using triple
quotes. It only modifies the underlying problem, but doesn't solve it.
Ok, so now we are in the territory of "Tell us what you are tryi
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 14:36, Stefan Ram wrote:
>
> Johannes Bauer writes:
> >I have a string. I want to evaluate it as if it were an f-string. I.e.,
> >there *are* obviously restrictions that apply (namely, the syntax and
> >semantics of f-strings), but that's it.
>
> (This message was written
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 11:56, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>
> Am 28.01.23 um 00:41 schrieb Chris Angelico:
> > On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 10:08, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!
> >> I appreciate the points you are making, Chris, but I am a bit taken
> >> aback by such forc
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 11:53, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> I don't want to have to care about what quotation is used inside the
> string, as long as it could successfully evaluate using the f-string
> grammar.
>
Not possible. An f-string can contain other f-strings, and it is
entirely possible to use
Am 27.01.23 um 23:10 schrieb Christian Gollwitzer:
Am 27.01.23 um 21:43 schrieb Johannes Bauer:
I don't understand why you fully ignore literally the FIRST example I
gave in my original post and angrily claim that you solution works
when it does not:
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {x['y']}"
print(s
Am 28.01.23 um 00:41 schrieb Chris Angelico:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 10:08, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!
I appreciate the points you are making, Chris, but I am a bit taken
aback by such forceful language.
The exact same points have already been made, but not listened t
Am 28.01.23 um 02:51 schrieb Thomas Passin:
This is literally the version I described myself, except using triple
quotes. It only modifies the underlying problem, but doesn't solve it.
Ok, so now we are in the territory of "Tell us what you are trying to
accomplish". And part of that is why y
On 2023-01-27 21:31:05 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> > But if you really REALLY know what you're doing, just use eval()
> > directly.
>
> I do, actually, but I hate it. Not because of the security issue, not
> because of namespaces, but because it does not reliably work:
>
> >>> s = "{\"x\" * 4}
On 2023-01-27 21:43:09 +0100, Johannes Bauer wrote:
> x = { "y": "z" }
> s = "-> {x['y']}"
> print(s.format(x = x))
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> KeyError: "'y'"
>
> This. Does. Not. Work.
>
> I want to pass a single variable as a dictionary and access its member
On 2023-01-27 20:56:49 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
> On 1/27/2023 5:10 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> > Am 27.01.23 um 21:43 schrieb Johannes Bauer:
> > > x = { "y": "z" }
> > > s = "-> {x['y']}"
> > > print(s.format(x = x))
> > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > File "", line 1, in
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Stefan Ram
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2023 4:31 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Evaluation of variable as f-string
Johannes Bauer writes:
>>Johannes Bauer writes:
>>>x = { "y": "z" }
>>>s =
On 1/27/2023 5:10 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 27.01.23 um 21:43 schrieb Johannes Bauer:
I don't understand why you fully ignore literally the FIRST example I
gave in my original post and angrily claim that you solution works
when it does not:
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {x['y']}"
print(s.
On 1/27/2023 3:33 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
Am 25.01.23 um 20:38 schrieb Thomas Passin:
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {target}"
print(s.format(target = x['y']))
Stack overflow to the rescue:
No.
Search phrase: "python evaluate string as fstring"
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47339121/h
Am 27.01.23 um 21:43 schrieb Johannes Bauer:
I don't understand why you fully ignore literally the FIRST example I
gave in my original post and angrily claim that you solution works when
it does not:
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {x['y']}"
print(s.format(x = x))
Traceback (most recent call last):
Am 27.01.23 um 20:18 schrieb Chris Angelico:
All you tell us is
what you're attempting to do, which there is *no good way to achieve*.
Fair enough, that is the answer. It's not possible.
Perhaps someone will be inspired to write a function to do it. 😎
See, we don't know what "it" is, so it
Am 23.01.23 um 17:43 schrieb Stefan Ram:
Johannes Bauer writes:
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {x['y']}"
print(s.format(x = x))
x = { "y": "z" }
def s( x ): return '-> ' + x[ 'y' ]
print( s( x = x ))
Except this is not at all what I asked for. The string "s" in my example
is just that, an exampl
Am 25.01.23 um 20:38 schrieb Thomas Passin:
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {target}"
print(s.format(target = x['y']))
Stack overflow to the rescue:
No.
Search phrase: "python evaluate string as fstring"
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47339121/how-do-i-convert-a-string-into-an-f-string
de
members in there.
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {x['y']}"
print(s.format(x = x))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
KeyError: "'y'"
I also want to be able to say things like {'x' * 100}, which .for
On 1/27/2023 5:54 PM, Rob Cliffe via Python-list wrote:
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!
I appreciate the points you are making, Chris, but I am a bit taken
aback by such forceful language.
I generally agree with asking for what the intent is. In this case it
seems pretty clear that the OP wants to use the
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 10:08, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!
> I appreciate the points you are making, Chris, but I am a bit taken
> aback by such forceful language.
The exact same points have already been made, but not listened to.
Sometimes, forceful language is require
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!
I appreciate the points you are making, Chris, but I am a bit taken
aback by such forceful language.
On 27/01/2023 19:18, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 05:31, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
On 23/01/2023 18:02, Chris Angelico wrote:
Maybe, rather than ask
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 05:31, Rob Cliffe via Python-list
wrote:
> On 23/01/2023 18:02, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > Maybe, rather than asking for a way to treat a string as code, ask for
> > what you ACTUALLY need, and we can help?
> >
> > ChrisA
> Fair enough, Chris, but still ISTM that it is reason
On 23/01/2023 18:02, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 04:56, Johannes Bauer wrote:
Hi there,
is there an easy way to evaluate a string stored in a variable as if it
were an f-string at runtime?
...
This is supposedly for security reasons. However, when trying to emulate
this be
On 25/01/2023 19:38, Thomas Passin wrote:
Stack overflow to the rescue:
Search phrase: "python evaluate string as fstring"
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47339121/how-do-i-convert-a-string-into-an-f-string
def effify(non_f_str: str):
return eval(f'f"""{non_f_str}"""')
print(ef
On 1/25/2023 1:26 PM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 23/01/2023 om 17:24 schreef Johannes Bauer:
Hi there,
is there an easy way to evaluate a string stored in a variable as if
it were an f-string at runtime?
I.e., what I want is to be able to do this:
x = { "y": "z" }
print(f"-> {x['y']}")
This p
Op 23/01/2023 om 17:24 schreef Johannes Bauer:
Hi there,
is there an easy way to evaluate a string stored in a variable as if
it were an f-string at runtime?
I.e., what I want is to be able to do this:
x = { "y": "z" }
print(f"-> {x['y']}")
This prints "-> z", as expected. But consider:
x
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 04:56, Johannes Bauer wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> is there an easy way to evaluate a string stored in a variable as if it
> were an f-string at runtime?
>
> ...
>
> This is supposedly for security reasons. However, when trying to emulate
> this behavior that I wanted (and know
Hi there,
is there an easy way to evaluate a string stored in a variable as if it
were an f-string at runtime?
I.e., what I want is to be able to do this:
x = { "y": "z" }
print(f"-> {x['y']}")
This prints "-> z", as expected. But consider:
x = { "y": "z" }
s = "-> {x['y']}"
print(s.format(
On 11/28/2016 2:02 PM, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> Also, FWIW users are looking for a Javascript replacement that is real
> Python, not another coffeescript.
does this count? http://brython.info/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:21 PM Alberto Berti <
azazel+python-annou...@arstecnica.it> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Héllo!
> i'm pleased to announce that JavaScripthon 0.5 has been released to
> PyPI. JavaScrypthon can translate a subset of Python 3.5 code to ES6
> JavaScript producing beautiful and lean
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, James Harris wrote:
> A list comprehension has various components. Anyone know when each of the
> elements is evaluated? In the form
>
> [v0 for v0 in expr0 if expr1]
>
> If v0 appears in expr0 or expr1 the evaluation order matters.
>
> I think of the above as be
A list comprehension has various components. Anyone know when each of
the elements is evaluated? In the form
[v0 for v0 in expr0 if expr1]
If v0 appears in expr0 or expr1 the evaluation order matters.
I think of the above as being a rewrite of
results = []
for v0 in expr0:
if expr1:
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:15:19 AM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Chris Angelico :
> > You prove here that Python has first-class expressions in the same way
> > that 80x86 assembly language has garbage collection. Sure, you can
> > implement it using the primitives you have, but that's not
ducing delayed evaluation to the discussion.
But having raised it, I do think it is an important and useful feature.
Python already has it in various ad hoc places, such as list comps and
generator expressions, ternary if, and/or, and it came up again recently
in the PEP for try...except express
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:13:21 AM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:24:49 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > wrote:
> >> Now actual python
> >> def sumjensen(i_get, i_set,lower,upper,exp):
> >> tot = 0
> >> i_set(lower)
> >> while i_get() <= upper:
> >>
I agree that we have not been understanding each other.
From you original post that I responded to:
The thing is, we can't just create a ∑ function, because it doesn't
work the way the summation operator works. The problem is that we
would want syntactic support, so we could write something like
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:24:49 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Rustom Mody
> wrote:
>> Now actual python
>>
>> def sumjensen(i_get, i_set,lower,upper,exp):
>> tot = 0
>> i_set(lower)
>> while i_get() <= upper:
>> tot += exp_get()
>> i_set(
Chris Angelico :
> You prove here that Python has first-class expressions in the same way
> that 80x86 assembly language has garbage collection. Sure, you can
> implement it using the primitives you have, but that's not support.
I was more reminded of STL and Boost. For example:
std::for_each
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Now actual python
>
> def sumjensen(i_get, i_set,lower,upper,exp):
> tot = 0
> i_set(lower)
> while i_get() <= upper:
> tot += exp_get()
> i_set(i_get() + 1)
> return tot
>
>
> i=0
> a=[3,4,5]
> i_get = lambda :
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:02:04 PM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:35:53 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:30:21 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > > One passes an unquoted expression in code by quoting it with either
> > > lambda, paired
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 9:35:53 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:30:21 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > On 3/25/2014 8:12 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:55:39 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> >>> On 3/25/2014 11:18 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
ation detail, not a language requirement, and it
doesn't apply to all delayed expressions:
py> dis("1/x if x else y")
1 0 LOAD_NAME0 (x)
3 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE 14
6 LOAD_CONST 0 (1)
9 LOAD_NAME
On Sunday, June 17, 2012 6:01:03 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> One day, in my Copious Spare Time, I intend to write a proper feature
> request and/or PEP for such a feature. Obviously the absolute earliest
> such a feature could be introduced is Python 3.4, about 18 months from
> now. (Alt
On 06/17/2012 11:35 PM, Gelonida N wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure whether what I ask for is impossible, but would know how
others handle such situations.
I'm having a module, which should lazily evaluate one of it's variables.
Meaning that it is evaluated only if anybody tries to use this variable.
On 6/17/2012 5:35 PM, Gelonida N wrote:
I'm having a module, which should lazily evaluate one of it's variables.
If you literally mean a module object, that is not possible. On the
other hand, it is easy to do with class instances, via the __getattr__
special method or via properties.
At
Another option would be to refactor your function so that it is a generator
expression using the yield keyword.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> Gelonida N wrote:
>
> > I'm having a module, which should lazily evaluate one of it's variables.
> > Meaning th
Gelonida N wrote:
> I'm having a module, which should lazily evaluate one of it's variables.
> Meaning that it is evaluated only if anybody tries to use this variable.
>
> At the moment I don't know how to do this and do therefore following:
>
>
> ### mymodule.py ###
> var = None
>
> d
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:44:47 +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 17Jun2012 23:35, Gelonida N wrote: | I'm having
> a module, which should lazily evaluate one of it's variables. | Meaning
> that it is evaluated only if anybody tries to use this variable.
>
> If it were an object member you could u
On 17Jun2012 23:35, Gelonida N wrote:
| I'm having a module, which should lazily evaluate one of it's variables.
| Meaning that it is evaluated only if anybody tries to use this variable.
If it were an object member you could use a property.
Does it need to be a module global?
In related news, c
Hi,
I'm not sure whether what I ask for is impossible, but would know how
others handle such situations.
I'm having a module, which should lazily evaluate one of it's variables.
Meaning that it is evaluated only if anybody tries to use this variable.
At the moment I don't know how to do thi
在 2012年2月11日星期六UTC+8上午7时57分56秒，Paul Rubin写道：
> Righard van Roy
> writes:
> > I want to add an item to a list, except if the evaluation of that item
> > results in an exception.
>
> This may be overkill and probably slow, but perhaps most in the spirit
> that y
Righard van Roy writes:
> Hello,
>
> I want to add an item to a list, except if the evaluation of that item
> results in an exception.
> I could do that like this:
>
> def r(x):
> if x > 3:
> raise(ValueError)
>
> try:
> list.
Righard van Roy writes:
> I want to add an item to a list, except if the evaluation of that item
> results in an exception.
This may be overkill and probably slow, but perhaps most in the spirit
that you're asking.
from itertools import chain
def r(x):
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Righard van Roy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to add an item to a list, except if the evaluation of that item
> results in an exception.
> I could do that like this:
>
> def r(x):
> if x > 3:
> raise(ValueError)
>
>
Hello,
I want to add an item to a list, except if the evaluation of that item
results in an exception.
I could do that like this:
def r(x):
if x > 3:
raise(ValueError)
try:
list.append(r(1))
except:
pass
try:
list.append(r(5))
except:
pass
This looks rather clum
On 3/14/2011 10:21 AM, Gerald Britton wrote:
Any idea why Python works this way? I see that, in 3.2, an
optimization was done for sets (See "Optimizations" at
http://docs.python.org/py3k/whatsnew/3.2.html) though I do not see
anything similar for dictionaries.
1/ because no one would ever s
Jean-Michel Pichavan wrote:
>> Today I noticed that an expression like this:
>>
>> "one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
>> "can be as bad as one"}
>>
>> could be evaluated at compile time, but is not:
>>
>>
[snip]
>> Any idea why Python works this way? I see that,
Gerald Britton wrote:
Today I noticed that an expression like this:
"one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
"can be as bad as one"}
could be evaluated at compile time, but is not:
dis(compile(
... '"one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the lonelies
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:23:32 -0500, Gerald Britton wrote:
> Today I noticed that an expression like this:
>
> "one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
> "can be as bad as one"}
>
> could be evaluated at compile time, but is not:
[...]
> Any idea why Python works this
On 3/10/2011 8:23 AM, Gerald Britton wrote:
Today I noticed that an expression like this:
"one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
"can be as bad as one"}
could be evaluated at compile time, but is not:
CPython barely evaluates anything at compile time.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:27:17 -0800, Chris Rebert wrote:
> 3. %-formatting is "obsolete and may go away in future versions of
> Python." (See
> http://docs.python.org/py3k/library/stdtypes.html#old-string-formatting-
operations
> )
There is an awful lot of opposition to that. If it ever happens,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:40:40 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 3/10/2011 11:23 AM, Gerald Britton wrote:
>>> Today I noticed that an expression like this:
>>>
>>> "one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
>>> "can
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:40:40 -0500, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/10/2011 11:23 AM, Gerald Britton wrote:
>> Today I noticed that an expression like this:
>>
>> "one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
>> "can be as bad as one"}
>>
>> could be evaluated at compile time, bu
On 3/10/2011 11:23 AM, Gerald Britton wrote:
Today I noticed that an expression like this:
"one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
"can be as bad as one"}
could be evaluated at compile time, but is not:
In fact, it could be evaluated at writing time ;-).
This wou
Today I noticed that an expression like this:
"one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number", "two":
"can be as bad as one"}
could be evaluated at compile time, but is not:
>>> dis(compile(
... '"one:%(one)s two:%(two)s" % {"one": "is the loneliest number",
"two": "can be as bad a
All,
I've been using the trace module for python (as per
http://www.dalkescientific.com/writings/diary/archive/2005/04/20/tracing_python_code.html),
and would very much like to have a feature there that I've implemented
for perl already.
Namely, I would like output in the format as described on t
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 05:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Ashish wrote:
>
> One more question: If I run the tool from multicore machine, will
> python3.1 or 3.2 be able to actually use multicore? or it will be
> running only on one core?
Only partly. Pure Python code is serialized (by the Global Interpreter
Lock
On Oct 13, 6:12 pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:27:29 -0700 (PDT)Ashish wrote:
>
> > Well, CBSocket is socket implementation that calls my callback on
> > data.
> > Both my classes AsyncHTTPSConnection and AsyncHTTPConnection use it
> > and use it the same way ( self.sock = CBS
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Ashish wrote:
>
> Well, CBSocket is socket implementation that calls my callback on
> data.
> Both my classes AsyncHTTPSConnection and AsyncHTTPConnection use it
> and use it the same way ( self.sock = CBSocket(sock2) ).
> The implemetation of AsyncHTTPCon
On Oct 13, 3:19 pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Ashish wrote:
>
> > > > Is the client machine at 100% CPU when you do that?
>
> > > With HTTP, I see client CPU at appx. 97%. However with HTTPS, it stays
> > > at 53-55%.
>
> And is the server at 100% CPU th
On Oct 13, 2:36 pm, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Ashish Vyas, 12.10.2010 14:40:
>
> > When I send request using HTTP, I am able to reach 1 transaction (request
> > sent,
> > response rcvd and validated.) per second from 20 parallel connections
> > easily.
> > Average response time shown is about 0.15
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Ashish wrote:
> >
> > > Is the client machine at 100% CPU when you do that?
> >
> > With HTTP, I see client CPU at appx. 97%. However with HTTPS, it stays
> > at 53-55%.
And is the server at 100% CPU then?
If the client is not at 100% CPU, it shouldn't be
Ashish Vyas, 12.10.2010 14:40:
When I send request using HTTP, I am able to reach 1 transaction (request sent,
response rcvd and validated.) per second from 20 parallel connections easily.
Average response time shown is about 0.15 seconds.
However, when I send request using HTTPS, I am seeing tha
On Oct 13, 11:11 am, Ashish wrote:
> On Oct 12, 6:33 pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:> On Tue, 12
> Oct 2010 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Ashish Vyas wrote:
> > > Another observation that I have made is with 10 parallel HTTPS connection
> > > each
> > > trying 1 transaction per second from 2 different
On Oct 12, 6:33 pm, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Ashish Vyas wrote:
> > Another observation that I have made is with 10 parallel HTTPS connection
> > each
> > trying 1 transaction per second from 2 different machines (effectively same
> > load
> > on serv
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Ashish Vyas wrote:
>
> I have made a tool for load testing of my company's web-server product. The
> tool
> is written using Python 3.1.
>
[...]
>
> So I feel HTTPS is blocking my test if I want to achieve higher TPS
> (transactions per second.) than
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Ashish Vyas wrote:
> Another observation that I have made is with 10 parallel HTTPS connection
> each
> trying 1 transaction per second from 2 different machines (effectively same
> load
> on server), the response time is again reducing to .17 secs.
> H
Hi All
I have made a tool for load testing of my company's web-server product. The
tool
is written using Python 3.1.
The tool basically does a HTTP or HTTPS post, gets response and parses the
response, does the response validation against expected response and maintains
the stats of average
On Jan 15, 11:47 am, dmitrey wrote:
> Thank you for the link, but I meant what is appropriate soft to be
> installed on my server to do things like that.
> Also, for my purposes it's better to have some text with possibility
> of reexecuting after some minor code changes than python interpreter
>
Anand Vaidya wrote:
> On Jan 16, 12:26 am, r0g wrote:
Diez
>> The Web2py framework works a bit like that, although it's not quite as
>> simplistic as what you describe. May be worth a look though.
>>
>> Roger.
>
>
> Hi r0g,
>
> web2py is a web-app framework (very similar to django, pylons
On Jan 16, 12:26 am, r0g wrote:
> >> Diez
>
> The Web2py framework works a bit like that, although it's not quite as
> simplistic as what you describe. May be worth a look though.
>
> Roger.
Hi r0g,
web2py is a web-app framework (very similar to django, pylons etc) and
it does not execute user
dmitrey wrote:
> Thank you for the link, but I meant what is appropriate soft to be
> installed on my server to do things like that.
> Also, for my purposes it's better to have some text with possibility
> of reexecuting after some minor code changes than python interpreter
> command prompt.
> Rega
Thank you for the link, but I meant what is appropriate soft to be
installed on my server to do things like that.
Also, for my purposes it's better to have some text with possibility
of reexecuting after some minor code changes than python interpreter
command prompt.
Regards, D.
On 15 янв, 16:41,
Am 15.01.10 15:16, schrieb dmitrey:
hi all,
what's the simplest way to create a webpage with a frame for Python
code to be typed in (as a plain text, or, better, as a highlighted
text or something like scite or any other easy python IDE, capable of
automatic indentations), and then pressing a but
hi all,
what's the simplest way to create a webpage with a frame for Python
code to be typed in (as a plain text, or, better, as a highlighted
text or something like scite or any other easy python IDE, capable of
automatic indentations), and then pressing a button to evaluate it
using a remote serv
For those of you interested in the Google tech of syntax coloring
source code in html on the fly using javascript, i've spent few hours
for a evaluation. See:
• Google-code-prettify Examples
http://xahlee.org/js/google-code-prettify/index.html
Xah
∑ http://xahlee.org/
☄
--
http://mail.pytho
Everyone wrote:
> [something intelligent]
Ah, clarity. My confusion can undoubtedly be traced to a non-existent
formal training in computer programming.
Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
James Stroud a écrit :
> Hello All,
>
> I'm curious, in
>
> py> 0 | (1 == 1)
> 1
> py> False | (1 == 1)
> True
>
> What is the logic of the former expression not evaluating to True (or
> why the latter not 1?)? Is there some logic that necessitates the first
> operand's dictating the result of
James Stroud wrote:
> I'm curious, in
>
> py> 0 | (1 == 1)
> 1
> py> False | (1 == 1)
> True
>
> What is the logic of the former expression not evaluating to True (or
> why the latter not 1?)? Is there some logic that necessitates the first
> operand's dictating the result of the evaluation? O
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
