On 1/28/2023 2:50 PM, Johannes Bauer wrote:
Am 28.01.23 um 02:51 schrieb Thomas Passin:
This is literally the version I described myself, except using triple
quotes. It only modifies the underlying problem, but doesn't solve it.
Ok, so now we are in the territory of "Tell us what you are trying to
accomplish". And part of that is why you cannot put some constraints
on what your string fragments are. The example I gave, copied out of
your earlier message, worked and now you are springing triple quotes
on us.
It works in this particular case, yes. Just like the example I gave in
my original case:
eval("f'" + s + "'")
"works" if there are no apostrophes used. And just like
eval("f\"" + s + "\"")
"works" if there are no quotation marks used.
I don't want to have to care about what quotation is used inside the
string, as long as it could successfully evaluate using the f-string
grammar.
Stop with the rock management already and explain (briefly if
possible) what you are up to.
I have a string. I want to evaluate it as if it were an f-string. I.e.,
there *are* obviously restrictions that apply (namely, the syntax and
semantics of f-strings), but that's it.
Well, yes, we do see that. What we don't see is what you want to
accomplish by doing it, and why you don't seem willing to accept some
restrictions on the string fragments so that they will evaluate correctly.
IOW, perhaps there is a more practical way to accomplish what you want.
Except that we don't know what that is.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
