On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:16:43 +0200, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>
wrote:
>Seymore4Head wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:22:35 -0400, Terry Reedy
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
import random
sets=3
for x in range(0, sets):
pb2=random.choice([
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:46:58 -0700, Larry Hudson
wrote:
>On 08/25/2014 08:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>[snip]
>> There is lots of help built in. Trying to read all the options makes
>> me realize the stuff I am working on is just the tip of the iceberg.
>> When checking the help function, it is c
Seymore4Head wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:22:35 -0400, Terry Reedy
> wrote:
>
>>On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>>> import random
>>> sets=3
>>> for x in range(0, sets):
>>> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
>>
>>You want random.randint(1, 53)
>>...
>>> alist = sorted([pb1, pb2, p
On 08/25/2014 08:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
[snip]
There is lots of help built in. Trying to read all the options makes
me realize the stuff I am working on is just the tip of the iceberg.
When checking the help function, it is clear I will never get to about
90% of the features.
Thanks
That
Mark Lawrence wrote:
from __past__ import print_statement (untested)
I don't think the PEP for the __past__ module has been
accepted yet, so you'd have to precede that with
from __future__ import __past__
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:22:35 -0400, Terry Reedy
wrote:
>On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>> import random
>> sets=3
>> for x in range(0, sets):
>> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
>
>You want random.randint(1, 53)
>...
>> alist = sorted([pb1, pb2, pb3, pb4, pb5])
>> print ("Your
On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:13:37 Chris Angelico did opine
And Gene did reply:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Mark Lawrence
wrote:
> > On 26/08/2014 12:24, MRAB wrote:
> >> On 2014-08-26 06:57, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> >>> On 26/08/2014 02:10, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> you should try python
On 26/08/2014 17:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
No, "python-flight-attendant" ;)
http://xkcd.com/353/
Would be nice if that could be made Python 3 compatible.
ChrisA
Easy.
from __past__ import print_statement (untested)
-
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> No, "python-flight-attendant" ;)
>
> http://xkcd.com/353/
Would be nice if that could be made Python 3 compatible.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
MRAB wrote:
> On 2014-08-26 06:57, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 26/08/2014 02:10, Joel Goldstick wrote:
>>> you should try python-tudor mailing list
>>>
>>
>> I'd try python-stewart and please don't top post, you've been around
>> long enough and ought to know better :)
>>
> Should that be "python-s
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 26/08/2014 12:24, MRAB wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-08-26 06:57, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/08/2014 02:10, Joel Goldstick wrote:
you should try python-tudor mailing list
>>>
>>> I'd try python-stewart and please don't top po
On 26/08/2014 12:24, MRAB wrote:
On 2014-08-26 06:57, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 26/08/2014 02:10, Joel Goldstick wrote:
you should try python-tudor mailing list
I'd try python-stewart and please don't top post, you've been around
long enough and ought to know better :)
Should that be "python
>>> you should try python-tudor mailing list
>>>
>>
>> I'd try python-stewart and please don't top post, you've been around
>> long enough and ought to know better :)
>>
> Should that be "python-stuart"?
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Glad I could add to the discussion
On 2014-08-26 06:57, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 26/08/2014 02:10, Joel Goldstick wrote:
you should try python-tudor mailing list
I'd try python-stewart and please don't top post, you've been around
long enough and ought to know better :)
Should that be "python-stuart"?
--
https://mail.python.o
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:32:14 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> alister :
>
>> Oh Wow I didn't know Python was that old - it even pre-dates
>> Electricity :-)
>
> Electricity arose already before the Great Inflation.
>
>
> Marko
but it was not in controlled use by mankind at that time
--
Whip
alister :
> Oh Wow I didn't know Python was that old - it even pre-dates
> Electricity :-)
Electricity arose already before the Great Inflation.
Marko
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:10:47 -0400, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> you should try python-tudor mailing list
>
Oh Wow I didn't know Python was that old - it even pre-dates
Electricity :-)
--
Hand, n.:
A singular instrument worn at the end of a human arm and
commonly thrust into somebod
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Gregory Ewing
wrote:
> Joel Goldstick wrote:
>>
>> you should try python-tudor mailing list
>
> ^
> Hmmm. I wonder what version of Python Henry VIII used?
Version 8.0, in a modern numbering scheme. See, those letters after
his name are
Joel Goldstick wrote:
you should try python-tudor mailing list
^
Hmmm. I wonder what version of Python Henry VIII used?
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 26/08/2014 02:10, Joel Goldstick wrote:
you should try python-tudor mailing list
I'd try python-stewart and please don't top post, you've been around
long enough and ought to know better :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our la
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:05:01 -0700 (PDT), Rustom Mody
wrote:
>On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:44:40 AM UTC+5:30, Seymore4Head wrote:
>> BTW the exercise instructions say to use the choice function. I
>> assume I had to include all the numbers to choose from instead of
>> picking a random number fr
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 21:52:24 +0100, Mark Lawrence
wrote:
>On 25/08/2014 21:14, Seymore4Head wrote:
>>
>> I included my shortcut for pb2. It doesn't work? Is there a short to
>> prevent from listing each number?
>>
>
>If it doesn't work then fix it and it will work. Alternatively define
>what
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:45:45 +1000, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
>Seymore4Head wrote:
>
>> import random
>> sets=3
>> for x in range(0, sets):
>> pb1=random.choice([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 [...] 52,53])
>> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
>
>You can avoid the annoyance of typing out long lists of sequent
Seymore4Head wrote:
> import random
> sets=3
> for x in range(0, sets):
> pb1=random.choice([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 [...] 52,53])
> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
You can avoid the annoyance of typing out long lists of sequential numbers
by using the range() function. And you can avoid writing o
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 20:51:36 -0400, Seymore4Head
wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:22:35 -0400, Terry Reedy
>wrote:
>
>>On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>>> import random
>>> sets=3
>>> for x in range(0, sets):
>>> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
>>
>>You want random.randint(1, 53)
>>...
>I
you should try python-tudor mailing list
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Seymore4Head
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:48:52 +0200, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>
> wrote:
>
>>Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
import random
sets=3
for x in range(0,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:48:52 +0200, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de>
wrote:
>Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>>> import random
>>> sets=3
>>> for x in range(0, sets):
>>> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
>>
>> You want random.randint(1, 53)
>> ...
>>> alist = so
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:22:35 -0400, Terry Reedy
wrote:
>On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>> import random
>> sets=3
>> for x in range(0, sets):
>> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
>
>You want random.randint(1, 53)
>...
I agree with you that random.randint would be what I would use too,
but
Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
>> import random
>> sets=3
>> for x in range(0, sets):
>> pb2=random.choice([1-53])
>
> You want random.randint(1, 53)
> ...
>> alist = sorted([pb1, pb2, pb3, pb4, pb5])
>> print ("Your numbers: {} Powerball: {}".format
On 8/25/2014 4:14 PM, Seymore4Head wrote:
import random
sets=3
for x in range(0, sets):
pb2=random.choice([1-53])
You want random.randint(1, 53)
...
alist = sorted([pb1, pb2, pb3, pb4, pb5])
print ("Your numbers: {} Powerball: {}".format(alist, pb6))
I am trying this example.
On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:44:40 AM UTC+5:30, Seymore4Head wrote:
> BTW the exercise instructions say to use the choice function. I
> assume I had to include all the numbers to choose from instead of
> picking a random number from 1-53 or 1-42.
> I included my shortcut for pb2. It doesn't wor
On 25/08/2014 21:14, Seymore4Head wrote:
I included my shortcut for pb2. It doesn't work? Is there a short to
prevent from listing each number?
If it doesn't work then fix it and it will work. Alternatively define
what "it doesn't work" means as I've run out of crystal balls, every
singl
import random
sets=3
for x in range(0, sets):
pb1=random.choice([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53])
pb2=random.choice([1-53])
pb3=random.choice([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1
33 matches
Mail list logo
