Op 2005-02-09, Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy) schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>> Ah, yes, the penny dropped. The try: except where there because
>> originally there were other statements I wanted to test and I
>> didn't want the raise exception by the inc(-2) stop the script.
>>
Antoon Pardon wrote:
> Ah, yes, the penny dropped. The try: except where there because
> originally there were other statements I wanted to test and I
> didn't want the raise exception by the inc(-2) stop the script.
> I completely forget to consider it would also catch the
> error I was expecting
Op 2005-02-09, Diez B. Roggisch schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Now although this behaviour was surprising after somethought
>> I think I may understand why things go wrong, but I certainly
>> don't understand the result I got. I would think an error like:
>>
>> TypeError: call() takes exactly 2 a
> Now although this behaviour was surprising after somethought
> I think I may understand why things go wrong, but I certainly
> don't understand the result I got. I would think an error like:
>
> TypeError: call() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given)
>
> would have been more appropiate.
>
>
> A
