On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:32:28 GMT, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 25 Oct 2005 05:22:20 -0700, "jas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed the
>following in comp.lang.python:
>
>> So it seems there is no good way to handle "interactive" processes on
>> windows using python. By interactive
Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Followed by the Amiga... The Amiga IPC used "message ports" (linked
> lists owned by the creating process to which, if "public" [named], other
> processes could send message packets). The Amiga port of REXX made use
> of message ports as its nat
I have setup multiple threads and a queue...which is working pretty
good. But I have one other issue...I have a new thread (since it is
different issue) here:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/ec81d8982d1a0130
if you get chance, would you mind checking that out.
T
I have setup multiple threads and a queue...which is working pretty
good. But I have one other issue...I have a new thread (since it is
different issue) here:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/ec81d8982d1a0130
if you get chance, would you mind checking that out.
T
Quoth "jas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Steve Holden wrote:
|> Look at how you might do it in other languages. Then you'll realise this
|> isn't (just) a Python problem.
|
| Yea your right. However, for example, in Java, one can use the Process
| class, and then read from the stream until its the end (
Jas,
I use a python called twisted to run processes as you describe.
Twisted is an event-driven framework that brings a change in the
way that you look at things.
take a look at:
http://twistedmatrix.com/projects/core/documentation/howto/process.html
Good luck, hope this is useful,
Mike
jas
Steve Holden wrote:
> Look at how you might do it in other languages. Then you'll realise this
> isn't (just) a Python problem.
Yea your right. However, for example, in Java, one can use the Process
class, and then read from the stream until its the end (i.e. -1 is
returned). However, with Pytho
jas wrote:
> So it seems there is no good way to handle "interactive" processes on
> windows using python. By interactive I mean processes/commands that
> require user interaction, such as telnet or del (to delete a file or
> directory sometimes you need to confirm with a yes or no), date, etc.
>
So it seems there is no good way to handle "interactive" processes on
windows using python. By interactive I mean processes/commands that
require user interaction, such as telnet or del (to delete a file or
directory sometimes you need to confirm with a yes or no), date, etc.
os.system gives the
What about having a thread which reads from subprocess.Popen()'s
stdout...instead of read/write, read/write. just always read, and
write when needed?
any comments on that idea?
jas wrote:
> actually, i can't check for ">" only because if you a dir, a line can
> end with a > but is not the end of
actually, i can't check for ">" only because if you a dir, a line can
end with a > but is not the end of the output
jas wrote:
> Thanks, that is certainly a start. As you mentioned, the "cd" could is
> an issue.
>
> Perhaps checking to see if the line ends with ">" is sufficient?
>
> Dennis Lee B
Thanks, that is certainly a start. As you mentioned, the "cd" could is
an issue.
Perhaps checking to see if the line ends with ">" is sufficient?
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2005 07:20:42 -0700, "jas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed the
> following in comp.lang.python:
>
> > Hi,
> > I w
12 matches
Mail list logo
