On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 3:08:15 AM UTC-7, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
> Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a
> browser - it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own wi
On 10 October 2017 at 16:07, oliver wrote:
> Can you elaborate what is not sufficient with Qt's web components?
I can't, sorry. Douglas was resurrecting a thread from a year ago. At
the time I was trying to do a quick proof of concept project and asked
for help on here. The project never really w
Can you elaborate what is not sufficient with Qt's web components?
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/topics-web-content.html. This allows for HTML, CSS,
Javascript, via either native C++ Qt, QML, or Python (PyQt) or mixtures of
these 3. That said, I have not yet used Qt`s web engine so I don`t know how
full-fe
Paul Moore said :
> On 9 October 2017 at 04:25, wrote:
>> Did you find out the answer for that?
>
> Nothing much beyond the pointer to PyQt (which basically said "a lot
> of the info on the web is out of date" so I should check the latest
> docs). I didn't take it much further, though, as it w
On 9 October 2017 at 04:25, wrote:
> Did you find out the answer for that?
Nothing much beyond the pointer to PyQt (which basically said "a lot
of the info on the web is out of date" so I should check the latest
docs). I didn't take it much further, though, as it was a hobby
project and the lear
Did you find out the answer for that?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wednesday, 19 October 2016 13:54:09 UTC+1, Mark Summerfield wrote:
>
> Since the application is a web app have you looked at:
> https://github.com/r0x0r/pywebview + https://github.com/dddomodossola/remi
> or at
> https://flexx.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
> These basically wrap the platform's web
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 11:08:15 AM UTC+1, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
> Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a
> browser - it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own w
On 19 October 2016 at 12:10, Phil Thompson wrote:
> The Chrome-based QWebEngineView (http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qwebengineview.html)
> is fully supported by PyQt.
Nice. Thanks for the pointer. Looks like the various bits of advice I
found on the web are a little out of date, is all.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Le 19/10/2016 à 12:07, Paul Moore a écrit :
I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a browser
- it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own window rather
than in a standard
On 19 Oct 2016, at 11:07 am, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> I'm looking to write a GUI application in Python (to run on Windows, using
> Python 3.5). The application is just a relatively thin wrapper around a
> browser - it's presenting an existing web application, just in its own window
> rather than
> I don't like it when you can D&D to position things. I don't understand why
> someone wouldn't want to write the positioning code, and have fun with the
> debugging. That's the best part about writing a program, in my opinion. I'm
> against D&D with programming, and I'm not sure why.
I don't
On 2013-09-20 19:34, Metallicow wrote:
I prefer wx over qt for these reasons.
Robin works for qt now. *Funny isn't it...*
Lying about someone's employment is not very funny. Robin does not work for "Qt"
or even Digia, the nearest thing to a corporate "owner" of Qt these days.
https://www.
On 09/20/2013 01:58 PM, Metallicow wrote:
> Sorry about that, nokia is/was. qt was developed(IIRC) for phones.
> Someone made money. And a lot of it. wx is a more or less a "free"
> project. I don't use a phone anymore. If I had a touch screen phone
> and was a developer, I still wouldn't use one.
Sorry about that, nokia is/was.
qt was developed(IIRC) for phones. Someone made money. And a lot of it.
wx is a more or less a "free" project.
I don't use a phone anymore. If I had a touch screen phone and was a developer,
I still wouldn't use one. I have my many reasons why...
--
https://mail.py
On 09/20/2013 12:34 PM, Metallicow wrote:
> I prefer wx over qt for these reasons. Robin works for qt now. *Funny
> isn't it...* Basically, To change qt(PySide) you need to pretty much
> need to be employed by qt, not the case with wx(is not a *For
> profit*, but you can donate.). In my opinion, in
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:55:59 PM UTC-5, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> There are a few known GUI toolkits out there, and the main ones from what I
> can tell are:
>
>
>
> Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
>
> PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
>
> PyGTK -- Gno
On Friday, September 13, 2013 10:31:17 AM UTC-7, Eamonn Rea wrote:
> I don't like the idea of being able to drag and drop anything in the
> programming world. Outside of that, I use D&D programs a lot. I got into GUI
> programming because I thought that I could get away from them, but I guess
>
On 09/17/2013 10:19 AM, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
> Sure. Every platform provides its own GUI library (Cocoa on Mac OS X,
> Win32 on Windows). Other programs that want to hook into yours, such
> as screen readers, are familiar with the platform's native GUI
> elements- it knows what a Win32 combo box
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 9:51 AM, rusi wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:49:28 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:55 AM, rusi wrote:
>>
>> > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> The main difference be
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:49:28 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:55 AM, rusi wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>
> >
> >> The main difference between wx and qt is that qt looks native on every
> >> pla
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:55 AM, rusi wrote:
> On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
>
>> The main difference between wx and qt is that qt looks native on every
>> platform
>> while wx *is* native on every platform (it uses native controls wherever
>> possib
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:21:49 PM UTC+5:30, Benjamin Kaplan wrote:
> The main difference between wx and qt is that qt looks native on every
> platform
> while wx *is* native on every platform (it uses native controls wherever
> possible). This means that wx integrates into the OS bett
On 2013-09-14, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
> If much of the code for a GUI is boiler-plate, busy-code etc. than I
> would suggest that the framework is not really as efficient as it
> should be.
There are very few Python GUI frameworks as such. They are almost all
just toolkits, not frameworks in th
> As complexity rises, though, I'd rather just code the creative parts
> of things, and not busy-code, which is what gui code becomes. Much
> of it is boiler-plate, cut and pasted, etc.
If much of the code for a GUI is boiler-plate, busy-code etc. than I
would suggest that the framework is not re
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:54 PM, wrote:
> Also, this thread hasn't been a troll. I'm completely serious. Why is it when
> I ask things like this people think I'm trolling?? :(
This is python-list. We're used to duck-typing. If it looks like a
file, we can write to it... if it looks like a troll
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 2:23:03 AM UTC+1, Ben Finney wrote:
> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>
>
>
> > But is it efficient to use an axe?
>
>
>
> Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or efficiency?
>
>
>
> > Is it sensible to use an axe when there is a chainsaw? No.
>
>
On 09/13/2013 12:23 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, September 13, 2013 4:02:42 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie
> wrote:
>> On 09/12/2013 10:03 AM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote: I think your
>> hate of gui designers is about 10 years out of date now, even if
>> you still prefer not to use them.
>
On 13/9/2013 15:37, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded that
> way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even)
> debugging.
>
> Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
> someth
eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
> But is it efficient to use an axe?
Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or efficiency?
> Is it sensible to use an axe when there is a chainsaw? No.
Which criterion is more important to *you* — fun, or sensibility?
> Eventually, everyone will be using
But is it efficient to use an axe? Is it sensible to use an axe when there is a
chainsaw? No. Eventually, everyone will be using chainsaws, and no one will be
using axes. This is my point: to have fun and be productive, but apparently
it's not possible.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:37:03 -0700, eamonnrea wrote:
> I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded
> that way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days
> even) debugging.
>
> Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
> so
On Friday, September 13, 2013 8:50:13 PM UTC+1, Joe Junior wrote:
> On 13 September 2013 16:37, wrote:
>
> > I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded
> > that way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even)
> > debugging.
>
> >
>
> > Well,
On Friday, September 13, 2013 8:56:15 PM UTC+1, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2013-09-13, Joe Junior wrote:
>
> > On 13 September 2013 15:39, John Gordon wrote:
>
> >> In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com>
>
> >> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>
> >>> they're making programming e
On 2013-09-13, Joe Junior wrote:
> On 13 September 2013 15:39, John Gordon wrote:
>> In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com>
>> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>>> they're making programming easier... by not coding as much.
>>> Oh well, guess coding is dead :(
>>
>> Pressing keys o
On 13 September 2013 16:37, wrote:
> I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded that
> way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even)
> debugging.
>
> Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
> something else to
On 9/13/2013 9:27 AM, Kevin Walzer wrote:
On 9/11/13 4:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
With the themed widget introduced in Tk 8.5, Tkinter is now a peer to
the other GUI toolkits in most respects, surpasses them in some (canvas
widget), and lags behind
I disagree with you. It's not hard, and I apologise if its ever sounded that
way, but it is the fun part for me. I love spending hours(days even) debugging.
Well, thanks all for depressing me. Time to give up programming and find
something else to do with my life.
--
https://mail.python.org/mai
On 13 September 2013 15:39, John Gordon wrote:
> In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com>
> eamonn...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> they're making programming easier... by not coding as much. Oh well,
>> guess coding is dead :(
>
> Pressing keys on a keyboard was never the hard part of
In <76784bad-cd6d-48f9-b358-54afb2784...@googlegroups.com> eamonn...@gmail.com
writes:
> they're making programming easier... by not coding as much. Oh well,
> guess coding is dead :(
Pressing keys on a keyboard was never the hard part of coding.
--
John Gordon A is for Amy,
On Friday, September 13, 2013 4:02:42 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 10:03 AM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
>I think your hate of gui designers is about 10 years out of date now,
> even if you still prefer not to use them.
So, you are recommending not to code as much? :'( That is w
Enthought.traits !! http://code.enthought.com/projects/traits/
I started using traits a couple of months ago and I really like it.
Traits provides a framework which creates a UI based on your data structures.
Using some "hints" you can do anything you want. Just check out their website
and try t
I don't like the idea of being able to drag and drop anything in the
programming world. Outside of that, I use D&D programs a lot. I got into GUI
programming because I thought that I could get away from them, but I guess not.
Maybe I'm against them because if I can't code, I don't have anything
On 9/11/13 4:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
With the themed widget introduced in Tk 8.5, Tkinter is now a peer to
the other GUI toolkits in most respects, surpasses them in some (canvas
widget), and lags behind in just two areas: printing (several
pla
> Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited
>
> PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
As others have pointed out, that's nonsensical. If you don't like the GUI
designer, just don't use it.
> wxPython -- Very nice, very professional, approved by Python creator, but
> a
On 09/12/2013 09:39 PM, Peter wrote:
> I stuck with Tkinter combined with PMW for a very long time, but the
> lack of extra widgets finally drove me to look elsewhere.
>
> I tried PyQT but didn't have a good experience. I can't remember
> details, but things just seemed to have little "gotchas" -
I stuck with Tkinter combined with PMW for a very long time, but the lack of
extra widgets finally drove me to look elsewhere.
I tried PyQT but didn't have a good experience. I can't remember details, but
things just seemed to have little "gotchas" - which the mailing list were very
helpful wit
On 09/12/2013 09:02 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> In any event I think you should give both Glade-3 and Qt Designer a
> serious look. I think your hate of gui designers is about 10 years out
> of date now, even if you still prefer not to use them.
This is a bit old but still how Qt works:
http://t
On 09/12/2013 10:03 AM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I didn't realise GTK has a GUI designer too :(
>
> I don't like it when you can D&D to position things. I don't
> understand why someone wouldn't want to write the positioning code,
> and have fun with the debugging. That's the best part about w
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:05:14 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
>
>
>
> What do you mean? Gtk has a GUI designer too. what of it?
>
>
>
> > I, personally, real
On 2013-09-12 17:03, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:05:14 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
Possibly. I know Qt and Gtk both can flip the button orders, etc to
look more native. And all good toolkits give you lay
On 2013-09-12, Robert Kern wrote:
> There is nothing forcing you to use the GUI designers if you don't want to.
There's also a markup language available, enaml:
http://docs.enthought.com/enaml/
Dave Cook
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013-09-12, Dave Cook wrote:
> There's also a markup language available, enaml:
>
> http://docs.enthought.com/enaml/
I should have mentioned that it's *Python*-based markup, not an XML
horrorshow.
http://pyvideo.org/video/1231/enaml-a-framework-for-building-declarative-user
Dave Cook
--
htt
On Sep 12, 2013 9:06 AM, wrote:
>
> On Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:05:14 AM UTC+1, Michael Torrie wrote:
> > On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
> >
> > What do you mean? Gtk has a GUI designer too. what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/13 21:55, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> There are a few known GUI toolkits out there, and the main ones
> from what I can tell are:
>
> Tkinter -- Simple to use, but limited PyQT -- You have a GUI
> designer, so I'm not going to count that PyG
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:55 PM, wrote:
> Have you got anything to say on what one I should be using(excluding PyQT
> because it has a D&D designer >:( )? Is Tkinter really dead? Should I stick
> with wxPython?
If that's a reason for excluding a GUI toolkit, you're in trouble.
Drag and drop la
On 2013-09-12, Michael Torrie wrote:
> Not me. wxWidgets' event model is way too MFC-esque for me. Does it
> still use event numbers that you define? Shudder.
You don't have to define IDs explicitly. That's been the case for a
long time.
> Gtk and Qt's method of signals and slots is by far t
On 09/11/2013 02:55 PM, eamonn...@gmail.com wrote:
> PyQT -- You have a GUI designer, so I'm not going to count that
What do you mean? Gtk has a GUI designer too. what of it?
> I, personally, really like wxPython, but I also really like Tkinter.
> I've messed with PyGTK, but I'd choose wxPython
On 19.03.2013 21:01, maiden129 wrote:
Hello,
I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show the of occurrences of
the character in the string in Tkinter.
My questions are:
How can I make an empty Entry object that will hold a word that a user will
enter?
How to make an empty Entr
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:21:06 PM UTC-5, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 3/19/2013 10:16 PM, Ranting Rick wrote:
> > [snip code]
>
> when I run this, and click the button, I get:
>
>TypeError: cbButton() missing 1 required positional argument: 'self'
>
> ...when I remove 'self' from cbButton, I
On 3/19/2013 10:16 PM, Ranting Rick wrote:
import tkinter as tk
from tkinter.constants import LEFT
def cbButton(self):
print('I should do something here!')
root = tk.Tk()
root.title("Window")
w=tk.Label(root, text="Enter a string")
w.pack(side=LEFT)
e1 = tk.Entry(root, bd=5)
e1.pack(side=L
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 9:36:28 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
> So should I redo my other code that I created with
> the radioButtons to change the colors of a text?
I believe so. Although you really should explain what your trying to achieve
with this code. There is nothing wrong with wrapping
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:16:25 PM UTC-4, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Mar 19, 8:25 pm, maiden129 wrote:
So should I redo my other code that I created with the radioButtons to change
the colors of a text?
from tkinter import *
class buttons:
def __init__(self):
window = Tk()
On Mar 19, 8:25 pm, maiden129 wrote:
> Here is my try to answer some of questions:
>
> [snip code]
I don't understand why you are wrapping this code into a class. Are
you trying to create something reuseable?
> I'm just struggling with only how to create an object that
> will hold a single chara
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, maiden129 wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:57:42 PM UTC-4, Rick Johnson wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show
> >
> > > the of occ
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:57:42 PM UTC-4, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show
>
> > the of occurrences of the character in the string in
>
> > Tkinter.
>
> >
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:01:24 PM UTC-5, maiden129 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show
> the of occurrences of the character in the string in
> Tkinter.
>
> My questions are:
>
> How can I make an empty Entry object that will hold a word
> that a use
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:39:51 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:01 AM, maiden129 wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show the of
> > occurrences of the character in the string in Tkinter.
>
>
>
> This sounds like
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 6:01 AM, maiden129 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using python 3.2.3 and I'm making a program that show the of occurrences
> of the character in the string in Tkinter.
This sounds like homework. Have you had a try at it yourself before
asking? If so, show us your code, and point
On Friday, January 25, 2013 8:34:16 AM UTC-8, Alex wrote:
> Hello, does python have capabilities to display a spatial image and read the
> coordinates from it? If so, what modules or extension do I need to achieve
> that? I'll appreciate any help.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
Try basemap: http
On Jul 6, 1:14 pm, sturlamolden wrote:
> Also a good GUI builder is far more important than language when it
> comes to making a GUI. Depending on toolkit my preferences are
> wxFormBuilder, Qt Designer, GLADE or MS Visual Studio.
Thats only true when using any language EXCEPT Python. With Pytho
On 6 Jul, 13:45, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> 1. Turn your C program into a library, and write a Python extension
Note that using ctypes, Cython or Boost.Python is much less painful
than using Python's C API directly.
> It might, however, be best to simply write the GUI in C as well, which
> would a
On Jul 6, 7:45 am, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 12:15 PM, francisco dorset wrote:
>
> > hey am a programmer i have good knowledge of the c language and i will
> > like to now how i can use to python to provide graphical user-interface
> > for my c programs and or the steps involved in doi
On 07/06/2010 12:15 PM, francisco dorset wrote:
> hey am a programmer i have good knowledge of the c language and i will
> like to now how i can use to python to provide graphical user-interface
> for my c programs and or the steps involved in doing this and is it
> possible
>
> if yes i will
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:26 PM, a wrote:
> where's the best online resource for teaching about GUI building?
There are many many resources available on the topic.
If you simply Google (tm) some of the keywords in your post
you'll be presented with a whole smorgasbord of useful resources.
--james
Il 18/01/2010 21:59, Mike Driscoll ha scritto:
> On Jan 18, 8:32 am, ted wrote:
>> Hi at all...
>> Can someone please give me some advice, about a good IDE with control
>> GUI under Linux ?
>>
>> Actually i know QT Creator by Nokia which i can use with Python (but i
>> don't know how).
>>
>> And,
On Jan 18, 8:32 am, ted wrote:
> Hi at all...
> Can someone please give me some advice, about a good IDE with control
> GUI under Linux ?
>
> Actually i know QT Creator by Nokia which i can use with Python (but i
> don't know how).
>
> And, a good library for access to database (mysql, sql server,
Le Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:32:36 +0100, ted a écrit :
>
> And, a good library for access to database (mysql, sql server, oracle) ?
If you want something high-level: http://www.sqlalchemy.org/
You won't regret it :)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Shawn Wheatley wrote:
It's not quite all encompassing, but I found this link last year when
looking for a similar comparison of Python GUIs:
http://ginstrom.com/scribbles/2008/02/26/python-gui-programming-platforms-for-windows/
Tkinter, Qt, GTK, IronPython... I think the only thing missing is
Jy
It's not quite all encompassing, but I found this link last year when
looking for a similar comparison of Python GUIs:
http://ginstrom.com/scribbles/2008/02/26/python-gui-programming-platforms-for-windows/
Tkinter, Qt, GTK, IronPython... I think the only thing missing is
Jython w/ Swing or SWT. Ch
On 18 Nov, 22:18, David Bolen wrote:
> With that said, for various reasons I still prefer wxPython to Qt, and
> at the moment, find wxFormBuilder the best fit for my own designs
> (even before the direct Python support, just using XRC).
Personally I prefer wxFormBuilder over QtDesigner for sizer
On Thursday 19 November 2009 11:50, Simon Hibbs wrote:
> I don't think a list like this is a great way to do that. There are
> plenty of examples and tutorials available for each option.
This site has a selection of tutorials that can be used to compare
API and code styles:
http://zetcode.com/
On 18 Nov, 22:11, Stef Mientki wrote:
> Simon Hibbs wrote:
> > On 18 Nov, 07:51, sturlamolden wrote:
>
> >> GPL
>
> > PyQT is GPL for now, but Qt itself is available under the LGPL as is
> > PySide. Eventualy PySide, which tracks the PyQT API, will supplant it
> > and the issue will be moot. For
On 18 Nov, 23:56, Kevin Walzer wrote:
> wxWidgets (the C++ library) has support for a lot of things other than
> UI bits, as well. wxPython itself is mainly a GUI library because the
> additional features of wxWidgets in C++ are redundant in Python.
That is true. Nobody uses wxPython for socket
On 18 Nov, 20:19, Dave Cook wrote:
> If it's an issue for your project, I suggest wxPython. It's
> cross-platform, fairly complete, and extensible. But the API is
> clunky compared to Qt.
Not if we use wxFormBuilder 3.1.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/18/09 4:15 PM, Simon Hibbs wrote:
On 17 Nov, 23:25, Kevin Walzer wrote:
On 11/17/09 4:25 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
+1 Tkinter for the simple stuff
You can actually use Tkinter to do quite sophisticated GUI's that rival
anything found in Qt or wx...
Neither Tkinteror Wx have anything t
Simon Hibbs wrote:
On 18 Nov, 07:51, sturlamolden wrote:
GPL
PyQT is GPL for now, but Qt itself is available under the LGPL as is
PySide. Eventualy PySide, which tracks the PyQT API, will supplant it
and the issue will be moot. For now it can be a problem, but PyQT
developer licenses
Simon Hibbs writes:
> I've had this problem for a few years. I've tried PythonCard,
> WxWidgets with WxDesigner, BoaConstructor, etc. None of them come
> anywhere close to PyQT/QTDesigner.
For me, the killer feature missing from of all of the wx-based
designers is that they require sizer based d
On 17 Nov, 23:25, Kevin Walzer wrote:
> On 11/17/09 4:25 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
>
> > +1 Tkinter for the simple stuff
>
> You can actually use Tkinter to do quite sophisticated GUI's that rival
> anything found in Qt or wx...
Neither Tkinteror Wx have anything that come close to QGraphicsView,
t
On 18 Nov, 07:51, sturlamolden wrote:
>
> GPL
PyQT is GPL for now, but Qt itself is available under the LGPL as is
PySide. Eventualy PySide, which tracks the PyQT API, will supplant it
and the issue will be moot. For now it can be a problem, but PyQT
developer licenses are very afordable at only
On 2009-11-18, sturlamolden wrote:
> GPL
If it's an issue for your project, I suggest wxPython. It's
cross-platform, fairly complete, and extensible. But the API is
clunky compared to Qt.
Dave Cook
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 18 Nov, 04:21, Dave Cook wrote:
> On 2009-11-16, me wrote:
>
> > Also looked at the frames/forms created with QtDesigner, which
> > can be used by Python via pyuic.
>
> That's what I would recommend. What did you not like about it?
GPL
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
On Nov 18, 8:10 am, sturlamolden wrote:
> On 17 Nov, 19:34, r wrote:
>
> > Agreed! Tkinter (besides myself) seems to be the whipping boy of
> > c.l.py. Tkinter has it's place in Python because of the same
> > simplicity people laboriously lament about! Until something else comes
> > along that ca
On 17 Nov, 19:34, r wrote:
> Agreed! Tkinter (besides myself) seems to be the whipping boy of
> c.l.py. Tkinter has it's place in Python because of the same
> simplicity people laboriously lament about! Until something else comes
> along that can offer the same benefits of Tkinter and a little ex
On 2009-11-16, me wrote:
> Also looked at the frames/forms created with QtDesigner, which
> can be used by Python via pyuic.
That's what I would recommend. What did you not like about it?
Dave Cook
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/17/09 4:25 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
+1 Tkinter for the simple stuff
You can actually use Tkinter to do quite sophisticated GUI's that rival
anything found in Qt or wx...
--
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Simon Hibbs wrote:
> On 16 Nov, 10:06, me wrote:
>
>> What Python gui builder is well supported, does not require me
>> to learn another framework/library, and can crank out stuff for
>> multiple platforms ?
>
> You're looking for a framework/library that doesn't require you to
> learn it. OK...
Scott David Daniels writes:
> Well, let's see. You want to do gui work without learning things. Good
> luck with that. If you discover how, I'd like to learn tensor analysis
> without using symbols or operations more complex than addition and
> subtraction. Maybe your groundwork can help me out w
On Nov 16, 5:06 am, me wrote:
> Good People
>
> I do not write stuff for humans, as it has been my job to remove
> humans from the loop. But I have to make a front end to a
> component database where everything was built in Python.
>
> I have looked at the Tk stuff that is built into Python -> not
On Nov 16, 5:06 am, me wrote:
> Good People
>
> I do not write stuff for humans, as it has been my job to remove
> humans from the loop. But I have to make a front end to a
> component database where everything was built in Python.
>
> I have looked at the Tk stuff that is built into Python -> not
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
