lol that reminds me of George! lol
;)
> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 19:28:29 +0200
> From: andiper...@gmail.com
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
>
> On 24.05.2013 17:25, Carlo
On 24.05.2013 17:25, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:29:14 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: dihedral88...@gmail.com
[some typical dihedral stuff]
I'm sorry but I don't under
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:29:14 -0700
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> From: dihedral88...@gmail.com
[...]
> Could a separate instance like the I/O device of a subprocess
> to be easily available in Pytho
On May 23, 2:42 pm, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 11:26 AM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
>
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:05 -0700
> >> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> >> From:
Carlos Nepomuceno於 2013年5月22日星期三UTC+8上午2時49分28秒寫道：
>
> > From: alyssonbr...@gmail.com
> > Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:03:13 -0300
> > Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> > To: python-list@python.org
Thank you! Hail Eris!!! :)
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 21:17:54 -0400
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> From: malaclyp...@gmail.com
> To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
> CC: python-list@python.org
>
> On T
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno <
carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Can str.format() do the following?
>
> f = '%d %d %d'
> v = '1,2,3'
> print f % eval(v)
>
Sure:
Python 3.2.2 (default, Sep 4 2011, 09:51:08) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
on win32
>>> f = "{} {} {}"
>>> v
> To: python-list@python.org
> From: tjre...@udel.edu
[...]
>> It's a conflict in the design. A tuple is used to supply multiple
>> arguments to the % operator. So if you want to have a tuple as the
>> first argument, you need to enclose it in another tuple.
On 5/23/2013 2:42 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
On 05/23/2013 11:26 AM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
eggs(a,f)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
eggs(a,f)
File "", line 1, in eggs
def eggs(spam, ham): return spam % ham
TypeError: not all arguments converted during string formattin
On 05/23/2013 11:26 AM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:05 -0700
Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
From: prueba...@latinmail.com
To: python-list@python.org
[...]
You left out the part where a and f
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 06:44:05 -0700
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> From: prueba...@latinmail.com
> To: python-list@python.org
[...]
>>>> eggs(a,f)
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> F
On May 22, 6:31 pm, Carlos Nepomuceno
wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:26:23 -0700
> > Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> > From: prueba...@latinmail.com
> > To: python-l...@python.org
> From: oscar.j.benja...@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 01:30:53 +0100
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
> CC: prueba...@latinmail.com; python-list@python.org
>
>
On 22 May 2013 23:31, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
>
> I still don't understand why % benefits from literals optimization
> ("'%d'%12345") while '{:d}'.format(12345) doesn't.
There's no reason why that optimisation can't happen in principle.
However no one has written a patch for it. Why don't you l
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:26:23 -0700
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> From: prueba...@latinmail.com
> To: python-list@python.org
[...]
>
> Maybe a cformat(formatstring, variables) function should b
On May 22, 2:30 pm, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 5/22/2013 10:58 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:45:12 -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
> >> I didn't mean to create a tempest in a teapot. I was away from
> >> comp.lang.python, python-bugs, and python-dev for a few years. In
>
On 5/22/2013 10:58 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:45:12 -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
I didn't mean to create a tempest in a teapot. I was away from
comp.lang.python, python-bugs, and python-dev for a few years. In
particular, I didn't ever see the aforementioned thread fro
On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:45:12 -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> I didn't mean to create a tempest in a teapot. I was away from
> comp.lang.python, python-bugs, and python-dev for a few years. In
> particular, I didn't ever see the aforementioned thread from Feb 2012.
> Had I known of that thread I
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 07:25:13 -0400
> From: n...@nedbatchelder.com
[...]
> You have to keep in mind that 2.7 is not getting any new features, no
> matter how small they seem. If you create a patch that implements the
> comma flag in %-formatting, it *mig
On 5/21/2013 11:38 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
From:steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
>Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
>Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:08:54 +
>To:python-list@python.org
[...]
>>So, the only alternative to have "
Please stop perpetuating this myth, see
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116789.html
and http://bugs.python.org/issue14123
>>> What myth?
>>
>> The myth that % string formatting is deprecated. It is not deprecated.
> Skip didn't say that it was deprecate
Carlos Nepomuceno於 2013年5月22日星期三UTC+8上午11時38分45秒寫道：
>
> > From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
> > Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:08:54 +
> > To: python-list
> From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 03:08:54 +
> To: python-list@python.org
[...]
>> So, the only alternative to have "'%,d&#
On 2013.05.21 21:59, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 14:53:54 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
>
>> On 2013.05.21 14:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
>>> Please stop perpetuating this myth, see
>>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116789.html
>>> and http://bugs.python.or
On Wed, 22 May 2013 05:56:53 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
>
>> From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format
>> Specifier for Thousands Separator Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 02:42:56 +
>> To: python-list@py
On Tue, 21 May 2013 14:53:54 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote:
> On 2013.05.21 14:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> Please stop perpetuating this myth, see
>> http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116789.html
>> and http://bugs.python.org/issue14123
>>
> What myth?
The myth that % string
> From: steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 02:42:56 +
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:22:24 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno
On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:22:24 +0300, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
> Anyway, is it possible to overload str.__mod__() without deriving a
> class? I mean to have something like:
No, not in Python. If you want to monkey-patch built-in classes on the
fly, with all the troubles that causes, use Ruby.
--
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:53:54 -0500
> From: bahamutzero8...@gmail.com
> To: python-list@python.org
[...]
>>
> What myth? People should indeed be using .format(), but no one said %
> formatting was going away soon. Also, the suggested change to the docs
> To: python-list@python.org
> From: breamore...@yahoo.co.uk
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 20:26:41 +0100
>
> On 21/05/2013 20:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>> Thank you,
On 05/21/2013 12:06 PM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd like
to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
There is no real reason to do this. `str.format()` is
On 2013.05.21 14:26, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 21/05/2013 20:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>>> Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd
>>> like to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
>>
>> That's unlikely to change. If not deprecated already string
>> interpola
> Analysing the code of "stringobject.c" I've found formatint() and
> formatlong().
I mean _PyString_FormatLong()
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> From: kwpol...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:06:11 +0200
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
> CC: python-list@python.org
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:49
On 21/05/2013 20:13, Skip Montanaro wrote:
Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd like
to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
That's unlikely to change. If not deprecated already string
interpolation using the modulo operator has lost favor to the stri
> Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd
> like to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
That's unlikely to change. If not deprecated already string
interpolation using the modulo operator has lost favor to the string
object's format method.
You might be a
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno
wrote:
> Thank you, but let me rephrase it. I'm already using str.format() but I'd
> like to use '%' (BINARY_MODULO) operator instead.
There is no real reason to do this. `str.format()` is the new shiny
thing you should be using all the time.
> From: alyssonbr...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 09:03:13 -0300
> Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator
> To: python-list@python.org
>
> This work in 3.1+:
>
> $ python3
> Python 3.1.3 (r313:8
This work in 3.1+:
$ python3
Python 3.1.3 (r313:86834, Nov 28 2010, 11:28:10)
[GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> one_number = 1234567
>>> print('number={:,}'.format(one_number))
number=1,234,567
>>>
paz e amor (love and peace),
Alysso
In article ,
Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
> Is there a way to format integers with thousands separator (digit grouping)
> like the format specifier of str.format()?>
> I'm currently using the following:>
> >>> sys.stdout.write('Number = %s\n' % '{:,.0f}'.format(x))
> Number = 12,345>
> 'x' is uns
40 matches
Mail list logo
