On Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:47:29 -0600, Karen Park declaimed
the following:
>I am trying to do a python code. Using Windows, I got as far as the step that
>asks me to “copy the logistics.py file and save it in the same folder that you
>are running python from” (as displayed by the command prompt).
t
variable.--(Unsigned mail from my phone)
Original message From: Karen Park Date:
28/11/22 10:07 (GMT+10:00) To: python-list@python.org Subject: Python coding
Hello,I am trying to do a python code. Using Windows, I got as far as the step
that asks me to “copy the logistics
On 27Nov2022 16:47, Karen Park wrote:
I am trying to do a python code. Using Windows, I got as far as the
step that asks me to “copy the logistics.py file and save it in the
same folder that you are running python from” (as displayed by the
command prompt).
Can you help direct me where to go t
Hello,
I am trying to do a python code. Using Windows, I got as far as the step that
asks me to “copy the logistics.py file and save it in the same folder that you
are running python from” (as displayed by the command prompt).
Can you help direct me where to go to copy and save this “logistics.
Hi,
Actually I have PCL file (i..e patran file).I want python coding to be done
so that it will read the PCL file and open Patran GUI window.How to do
that.Kindly find the attached PCL file for your ref.
Thanks regards
Kamalakar
shell.pcl
Description: Binary data
--
http://mail.python.org
On 1/5/2011 6:24 PM Bubba said...
Your code only shows the first 488 bytes of the file?
add 'rb' to the open statement...
>>> pdflines = open(r'c:\shared\python_book_01.pdf','rb').readlines()
>>> sps = [0]
>>> for ii in pdflines: sps.append(sps[-1]+len(ii))
Emile
--
http://mail.python.
On 1/5/2011 5:55 PM Bubba said...
Does this work for binary files? (Like PDFs)
I don't know what you want -- pdf's are not line oriented so searching
for \n's is sketchy from the get go.
I figured this was homework to test something
Emile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
Your code only shows the first 488 bytes of the file?
--
- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v4.0 Final
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
--- - -- -
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Does this work for binary files? (Like PDFs)
--
- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v4.0 Final
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
--- - -- -
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 1/5/2011 3:12 PM kanth...@woh.rr.com said...
>
> I want to use Python to find all "\n" terminated
>> strings in a PDF file, ideally returning string
>> starting addresses. Anyone willing to help?
>>
>
> pdflines = open(r'c:\shared\p
On 1/5/2011 3:12 PM kanth...@woh.rr.com said...
I want to use Python to find all "\n" terminated
strings in a PDF file, ideally returning string
starting addresses. Anyone willing to help?
pdflines = open(r'c:\shared\python_book_01.pdf').readlines()
sps = [0]
for ii in pdflines: sps.append(sp
I want to use Python to find all "\n" terminated
strings in a PDF file, ideally returning string
starting addresses. Anyone willing to help?
--
- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v4.0 Final
Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet
--- -
Sebastian 'lunar' Wiesner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ zxo102 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
how to change the hexadecimal 'ED6F3C01' (or 'ED 6F 3C 01') to
"\xED\x6F\x3C\x01" in python coding?
When I take 'ED6F3C01&#
zxo102 wrote:
Hi,
how to change the hexadecimal 'ED6F3C01' (or 'ED 6F 3C 01') to
"\xED\x6F\x3C\x01" in python coding?
If by "in python coding" you mean "in Python source code", then just
type it in with \x in front of each pair of hex dig
x27;, '0x1']
Cheers,
Cliff
> On 5月25日, 上午6时46分, Sebastian 'lunar' Wiesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > [ zxo102 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> >
> > >how to change the
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 15:36 -0700, zxo102 wrote:
> Hi,
>how to change the hexadecimal 'ED6F3C01' (or 'ED 6F 3C 01') to
> "\xED\x6F\x3C\x01" in python coding?
> When I take 'ED6F3C01' as a string and insert '\x' into it, I jus
5月25日, 上午6时46分, Sebastian 'lunar' Wiesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
>
> > [ zxo102 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
>
> > >how to change the hexadecimal 'ED6F3C01' (or
PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [ zxo102 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
>
> >how to change the hexadecimal 'ED6F3C01' (or 'ED 6F 3C 01') to
> > "\xED\x6F\x3C\x01" in python coding?
> > When I take 'ED6F3C01' as a string
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ zxo102 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
>how to change the hexadecimal 'ED6F3C01' (or 'ED 6F 3C 01') to
> "\xED\x6F\x3C\x01" in python coding?
> When I take 'ED6F3C01' as a string and insert '
Hi,
how to change the hexadecimal 'ED6F3C01' (or 'ED 6F 3C 01') to
"\xED\x6F\x3C\x01" in python coding?
When I take 'ED6F3C01' as a string and insert '\x' into it, I just got
the error information : invalid \x escape.
Thanks.
ouyang
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 11:23 -0500, John Shappell wrote:
> I don’t understand what this question is asking; can you clarify for
> me and maybe point me in the right direction?
>
>
>
> As an exercise, rewrite this line of code without using a sequence
> assignment.
>
> self.cards[i], self.cards
: python-list@python.orgSubject: assistance with
python coding
I don’t understand what this
question is asking; can you clarify for me and maybe point me in the right
direction?
As an exercise,
rewrite this line of code without using a sequence
assignment.
self.cards[i
I don’t understand what this question is asking; can
you clarify for me and maybe point me in the right direction?
As an exercise, rewrite
this line of code without using a sequence assignment.
self.cards[i], self.cards[j] =
self.cards[j], self.cards[i]
V/R
CW2 John Shappell
Michael Spencer wrote:
> Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
>> ...I analysed the outcome of it and have
>> come to the conclusion, that there were two major factors which
>> contributed to squeezing of code:
>>
>>(1). usage of available variants for coding of the same thing
>>(2). sqeezing the size
Christian Tismer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hans Nowak wrote:
>
> >... for u in(3,14,10))
> >
> > can be written as:
> >
> >... for u in 3,14,10)
> >
> > which would shave off a character. Tuples don't always need parentheses...
>
> This would work with a list comprehension.
> Do
Claudio Grondi wrote:
> ...I analysed the outcome of it and have
> come to the conclusion, that there were two major factors which
> contributed to squeezing of code:
>
>(1). usage of available variants for coding of the same thing
>(2). sqeezing the size of used numeric and string litera
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Simon Hengel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>> After all, I'd really love to set up another contest with
>> different measures and criteria.
>
>for future events i will take a close look at other possibilities for
>doing a ranking. At the moment the 22c3 and t
Claudio Grondi wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:49:58 +0100, Claudio Grondi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> What I have thought about as a simpler/better solution is a method
>>> allowing to avoid processing the content of the string or long
>>> integer object by looping over its
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>>I'm reminded of a time I was going for a drive in the country when I drove
>>past an apple orchid. Standing in the orchid was a farmer with a pig. He
>>lifted the pig into the air, and the pig then bit an apple and slowly
>>chewed it. The farme
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I'm reminded of a time I was going for a drive in the country when I drove
> past an apple orchid. Standing in the orchid was a farmer with a pig. He
> lifted the pig into the air, and the pig then bit an apple and slowly
> chewed it. The farmer then carried him over to an
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:49:58 +0100, Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
>
>
>>What I have thought about as a simpler/better solution is a method
>>allowing to avoid processing the content of the string or long integer
>>object by looping over its content.
>
>
> How can you avoi
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:49:58 +0100, Claudio Grondi wrote:
> What I have thought about as a simpler/better solution is a method
> allowing to avoid processing the content of the string or long integer
> object by looping over its content.
How can you avoid looping over its content? Whether you
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 03:34:33 +0100, Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
>
>>>Please send me comments, suggestions and ideas.
>>
>>Now, after the contest is over I analysed the outcome of it and have
>>come to the conclusion, that there were two major factors which
>>contributed to
Claudio Grondi wrote:
>> Please send me comments, suggestions and ideas.
>
>
> Now, after the contest is over I analysed the outcome of it and have
> come to the conclusion, that there were two major factors which
> contributed to squeezing of code:
>
> (1). usage of available variants for c
On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 03:34:33 +0100, Claudio Grondi wrote:
>> Please send me comments, suggestions and ideas.
>
> Now, after the contest is over I analysed the outcome of it and have
> come to the conclusion, that there were two major factors which
> contributed to squeezing of code:
>
>(1)
> Please send me comments, suggestions and ideas.
Now, after the contest is over I analysed the outcome of it and have
come to the conclusion, that there were two major factors which
contributed to squeezing of code:
(1). usage of available variants for coding of the same thing
(2). sqeez
Hans Nowak wrote:
>... for u in(3,14,10))
>
> can be written as:
>
>... for u in 3,14,10)
>
> which would shave off a character. Tuples don't always need parentheses...
This would work with a list comprehension.
Doesn't work with a generator expression
(thought of it, too, and the l
André wrote:
> Hans Nowak wrote:
>
>>André wrote:
>
>
>>I don't know if this suggestion has been made already, but it seems to
>>me that the end of the expression
>>
>> ... for u in(3,14,10))
>>
>>can be written as:
>>
>> ... for u in 3,14,10)
>>
>>which would shave off a character. Tuple
Hans Nowak wrote:
> André wrote:
>
> I don't know if this suggestion has been made already, but it seems to
> me that the end of the expression
>
>... for u in(3,14,10))
>
> can be written as:
>
>... for u in 3,14,10)
>
> which would shave off a character. Tuples don't always need paren
André wrote:
> Christian Tismer wrote:
>>It seems to be very hard to improve. No idea if this is
>>possible: One might try to re-order the character string
>>a bit to change moduli, trying to get one more number in
>>
>>(3,14,10)
>>
>>to be one-digit. Haven't tried, yet, and chances are small.
>>
Christian Tismer wrote:
> André wrote:
> > For the few that might be interested, I will be posting the details of
> > a 117 character long solution to the challenge on my blog
> > http://aroberge.blogspot.com/.
>
...
> It seems to be very hard to improve. No idea if this is
> possible: One might t
André wrote:
> For the few that might be interested, I will be posting the details of
> a 117 character long solution to the challenge on my blog
> http://aroberge.blogspot.com/.
Congratulations!
I'm very impressed by this elegant solution.
It seems to be very hard to improve. No idea if this is
p
Just wrote:
> Duh, sorry, it's early. 118 is better than 119. Printable or not :)
> Still, a 119 bytes version that is fully printable is pretty cool.
No, you're right, I also somehow missed the point. I believed "»" to be
"printable" (opposed to control char's) but technically speaking, the
co
So, testosterone wins again!
We get to boast:
"Mine's smaller than your's"
Lets wait for Pythonic to go to bed, then sneak downstairs, go to that
tripple-X rated 'shortest solutions' website, and 'whack-off' some
solutions.
Unghhh, my solution... its coming!!!
Well don't forget to clean up be
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Just <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Mark Dickinson wrote:
> > > Here's a variant of André's brilliant idea that's
> > > 119 characters long, and fully printable:
> > >
> > > j='
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Dickinson wrote:
> > Here's a variant of André's brilliant idea that's
> > 119 characters long, and fully printable:
> >
> > j=''.join;seven_seg=lambda z:j(j(' _ | |_ _|_|'
> > [ord('^r|=Zm.:v\r'[int(a)])%u*
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> Here's a variant of André's brilliant idea that's
> 119 characters long, and fully printable:
>
> j=''.join;seven_seg=lambda z:j(j(' _ | |_ _|_|'
> [ord('^r|=Zm.:v\r'[int(a)])%u*2:][:3]for a in z)
> +"\n"for u in(3,7,8))
You have an escaped CR (\r) as the last character
Here's a variant of André's brilliant idea that's
119 characters long, and fully printable:
j=''.join;seven_seg=lambda z:j(j(' _ | |_ _|_|'
[ord('^r|=Zm.:v\r'[int(a)])%u*2:][:3]for a in z)
+"\n"for u in(3,7,8))
Mark
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I managed it with vim.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
> P.S. By the way: on Windows XP with UltraEdit there was no problem to
> input the special characters. There is an ASCII table and a HEX editor
> mode available for it. Any hints which free editor makes it possible, too?
I simply used Pythonwin. (print chr(3), then cut an
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Claudio Grondi wrote:
> > so I tried all which made sense in the context of '0' conversion and
> > found out, that it should be the
> >
> >' _ |_|_ _| |'
> >
> > not the at http://aroberge.blogspot.com/
> >
> >' _ |_|_ _| |'
>
> The HTML source has the three spaces
Claudio Grondi wrote:
> so I tried all which made sense in the context of '0' conversion and
> found out, that it should be the
>
>' _ |_|_ _| |'
>
> not the at http://aroberge.blogspot.com/
>
>' _ |_|_ _| |'
The HTML source has the three spaces. If the code had been surrounded
by
André wrote:
> For the few that might be interested, I will be posting the details of
> a 117 character long solution to the challenge on my blog
> http://aroberge.blogspot.com/.
>
> Enjoy!
>
> André
>
It doesn't work for me as described on that page.
The output is scrumbled. It seems, that the
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> André wrote:
>
>>For the few that might be interested, I will be posting the details of
>>a 117 character long solution to the challenge on my blog
>>http://aroberge.blogspot.com/.
>>
>>Enjoy!
>
>
> You took advantage of prime numbers, enabling you to extract encoded
> i
André wrote:
> For the few that might be interested, I will be posting the details of
> a 117 character long solution to the challenge on my blog
> http://aroberge.blogspot.com/.
>
> Enjoy!
You took advantage of prime numbers, enabling you to extract encoded
information using a single modulus op
For the few that might be interested, I will be posting the details of
a 117 character long solution to the challenge on my blog
http://aroberge.blogspot.com/.
Enjoy!
André
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thomas Heller wrote:
>
>>X=' _ _ _ | _| _ |_|_'
>>Y=0x23018F406A3530EC273F008
>>j="".join
>>seven_seg=lambda n:j(j(c)+"\n"for c in zip(*[X[Y>>m+int(d)*9&7::8]for d in n
>>for m in(6,3,0)]))
>
>
> Interesting bit:
>
> Although there are more 3-char combinations
Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> my two solutions (well I wasn't so clever to encode everything in
> strings instead of numbers, but at least it won't give warnings about
> non ascii characters):
> 128:
> j,seven_seg=''.join,lambda s:j(j(' |_ |'[i>>3*int(c)&b]for c in s for b
> in(4,2,1))+'\n'for i in(306775
my two solutions (well I wasn't so clever to encode everything in
strings instead of numbers, but at least it won't give warnings about
non ascii characters):
128:
j,seven_seg=''.join,lambda s:j(j(' |_ |'[i>>3*int(c)&b]for c in s for b
in(4,2,1))+'\n'for i in(306775170,1060861645,524130191))
122:
Tim Hochberg wrote:
> g=''.join;seven_seg=lambda i:g(
> g(' _|x|'[ord("~$]m'k{d\x7fo"[int(n)])>>s&j]
> for n in i for j in(2,1,4))+'\n'for s in(6,0,3))
>
> I've replaced the unprintable characters and added some preemptive
> linebreaks so that hopefully this won't get too munged. It's all clear
Tim Hochberg wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> Andrew Durdin wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/28/05, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
I just found a 125 character solution. It's actually faster and more
readable than the 133 character solution (though it's still obscure.)
>>>
>>> Hav
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Andrew Durdin wrote:
>
>>On 12/28/05, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I just found a 125 character solution. It's actually faster and more
>>>readable than the 133 character solution (though it's still obscure.)
>>
>>
>>Having spent a good deal of time a
Thomas Heller wrote:
> X=' _ _ _ | _| _ |_|_'
> Y=0x23018F406A3530EC273F008
> j="".join
> seven_seg=lambda n:j(j(c)+"\n"for c in zip(*[X[Y>>m+int(d)*9&7::8]for d in n
> for m in(6,3,0)]))
Interesting bit:
Although there are more 3-char combinations when you read vertically,
they compact be
Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Durdin wrote:
>> On 12/28/05, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>I just found a 125 character solution. It's actually faster and more
>>>readable than the 133 character solution (though it's still obscure.)
>> Having spent a good de
Andrew Durdin wrote:
> On 12/28/05, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I just found a 125 character solution. It's actually faster and more
>>readable than the 133 character solution (though it's still obscure.)
>
>
> Having spent a good deal of time and effort, and not getting below
On 12/28/05, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just found a 125 character solution. It's actually faster and more
> readable than the 133 character solution (though it's still obscure.)
Having spent a good deal of time and effort, and not getting below 144
characters, I am now very ea
Duncan Booth wrote:
> Christian Tismer wrote:
>
>> And then help me to setup a different contest about content -- chris
>>
> Count me in.
Great! Let's find a problem small enough to solve in reasonably
time and large enough to exploit Python qualities.
sincerely -- chris (below 130)
--
Chr
> It seems, that the site had some trouble to stay online and especially
> to provide the ranking today.
There was a problem with our server, sorry for that.
Have fun,
Simon Hengel
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Simon Hengel wrote:
> Hello,
> we are hosting a python coding contest an we even managed to provide a
> price for the winner...
>
> http://pycontest.net/
>
> The contest is coincidentally held during the 22c3 and we will be
> present there.
>
> https://ev
I cannot reach the contest site at since all this morning. :-(
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I cannot not reach the contest site at since all this morning. :-(
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i broke things while tweaking some stuff.
Sorry for the inconveniences,
Simon Hengel
--
python coding contest - http://www.pycontest.net/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
not keep up with all mails. Sorry
for that.
Cheers,
--
python coding contest - http://www.pycontest.net/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> the dream of winning the contest seems to be over.
Sorry for that, I'm considering doing a ranking on the nicest cheats too.
Have fun,
Simon Hengel
--
python coding contest - http://www.pycontest.net/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Simon Hengel wrote:
> Hello,
> we are hosting a python coding contest an we even managed to provide a
> price for the winner...
>
> http://pycontest.net/
>
> The contest is coincidentally held during the 22c3 and we will be
> present there.
>
> https://ev
[Bengt Richter]
> ...
> [23:28] C:\pywk\clp\seven\pycontest_01>wc -lc seven_seg.py
> 2136 seven_seg.py
>
> 2 lines, 136 chars including unix-style lineseps (is that cheating on
> windows?)
Na. Most native Windows apps (including native Windows Python) don't
care whether \n or
Marius Gedminas wrote:
> Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:02:57 -0700, Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>>
Paul McGuire wrote:
Also, here's another cheat version. (No, 7seg.com does not exist.)
import urllib2
>
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:02:57 -0700, Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Shane Hathaway wrote:
> >> Paul McGuire wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Also, here's another cheat version. (No, 7seg.com does not exist.)
> >>
> >>import urllib2
> >>def seven_seg(x):return u
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I just found a 125 character solution. It's actually faster and more
> readable than the 133 character solution (though it's still obscure.)
>
> It depends on Python 2.4. If Python 2.3 compatibility is required for
> the contest, I have to add 4 characters.
I asked, 2.
I just found a 125 character solution. It's actually faster and more
readable than the 133 character solution (though it's still obscure.)
It depends on Python 2.4. If Python 2.3 compatibility is required for
the contest, I have to add 4 characters.
Shane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pycontest_01]$ wc
Christian Tismer wrote:
> And then help me to setup a different contest about content -- chris
>
Count me in.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Tim Hochberg wrote:
> py pan wrote:
>
>>When you guys say 127~150 characters, did you guys mean
>>usinging test_vectors.py in some way? Or there's no import at all?
>>
>
>
> No import at all. The shortest solution reported so far is 131
> characters. Getting down to 127 is just a guess as to wh
On 27 Dec 2005 09:24:44 GMT, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Scott David Daniels wrote:
>
>>> I definitively need a new algorythm.
>>>
>> And I am sadly stuck at 169. Not even spitting distance from 149 (which
>> sounds like a non-cheat version).
>
>Throw it away and start again with a
Christian Tismer wrote:
>>> I feel that python is more beautiful and readable, even if you write
>>> short programs.
> Looking at what I produced the last days, I'm not convinced...
Me neither. Especially since I've taken the one-liner road. Python can
be very unreadable... sometimes.
> And th
On 12/27/05, Christian Tismer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And we are of course implementing algorithms with a twisted goal-setin mind: How to express this the shortest way, not elegantly,just how to shave off one or even two bytes, re-iterating thepossible algorithms again and again, just to find a
Christian Tismer wrote:
[SNIP]
> And then help me to setup a different contest about content -- chris
As usual, I expect that actually having some working code measuring
'Pythonic' length (and I'm sure we could get into all sorts of fun
arguments about the exact definition of that) would go a l
Remi Villatel wrote:
> Scott David Daniels wrote:
>
> [--CUT---]
>>> 39 bytes... 53 bytes... It gives me the impression to follow a jet
>>> plane with a bike with my 179 bytes!
> [--CUT--]
>
>> And I am sadly stuck at 169. Not even spitting distance from 149 (which
>> sounds like a
Scott David Daniels wrote:
[--CUT---]
>> 39 bytes... 53 bytes... It gives me the impression to follow a jet
>> plane with a bike with my 179 bytes!
[--CUT--]
> And I am sadly stuck at 169. Not even spitting distance from 149 (which
> sounds like a non-cheat version).
Try harder
James Tanis wrote:
> On 12/25/05, Simon Hengel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>> I'm envisioning lots of convoluted one-liners which
>>> are more suitable to a different P-language... :-)
>> I feel that python is more beautiful and readable, even
Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:02:57 -0700, Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>
>>>Paul McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Also, here's another cheat version. (No, 7seg.com does not exist.)
>>>
>>> import urllib2
>>> def seven_seg(x):return urllib2
Tim Hochberg wrote:
> Note that in principle it's possible to encode the data for how to
> display a digit in one byte. Thus it's at least theoretically possible
> to condense all of the information about the string into a string that's
> 10 bytes long. In practice it turns out to be hard to do tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I now have a version which passes the test suite in 32 bytes grin>
>
> -T.
>
After I have posted the statement, that I have one with 39 bytes, I had
the 32 version five minutes later, but thougt that instead of posting it
I can maybe use it as entry on the contest ..
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:02:57 -0700, Tim Hochberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> Paul McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>> Also, here's another cheat version. (No, 7seg.com does not exist.)
>>
>>import urllib2
>>def seven_seg(x):return urllib2.urlopen('http://7seg.com/'+x).read()
>
Tim Hochberg wrote:
> py pan wrote:
>> When you guys say 127~150 characters, did you guys mean
>> usinging test_vectors.py in some way? Or there's no import at all?
>>
>
> No import at all. The shortest solution reported so far is 131
> characters. Getting down to 127 is just a guess as to wher
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Paul McGuire wrote:
>
>>"Paul McGuire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>>Well *I'm* certainly looking forward to learning some new tricks! My
>>>(non-cheat) version is a comparatively-portly 245, and no alternatives are
>>>popping into
py pan wrote:
> When you guys say 127~150 characters, did you guys mean
> usinging test_vectors.py in some way? Or there's no import at all?
>
No import at all. The shortest solution reported so far is 131
characters. Getting down to 127 is just a guess as to where the lower
bound is likely to
On 12/25/05, Simon Hengel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > I'm envisioning lots of convoluted one-liners which
> > are more suitable to a different P-language... :-)
> I feel that python is more beautiful and readable, even if you write
> short prog
When you guys say 127~150 characters, did you guys mean usinging test_vectors.py in some way? Or there's no import at all?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
So, is an ugly short one a candidate?
i managed in 199 bytes :)
i'll send it in anyway
ciao
http://gumuz.looze.net/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Tim Hochberg wrote:
>
>>Paul McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Shane Hathaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>>
I'm down to 133 characters (counted according to 'wc -c') on a single
line. It contains about 11 whitespace characters (
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
