Alex Biddle wrote:
> Ah, so separate downloads then. At least now I know.
>
> Ergh... I checked the version of Python my current host is running and its
> 2.2.
>
> ...ergh
This is why you really want a VPS (virtual private server). The cost is
similar to a web host but you get to choose y
Alex Biddle wrote:
> Ah, so separate downloads then. At least now I know.
>
> Ergh... I checked the version of Python my current host is running and its
> 2.2.
>
> ...ergh
This is why you really want a VPS (virtual private server). The cost is
similar to a web host but you get to choose yo
Alex Biddle wrote:
> Ah, so separate downloads then. At least now I know.
>
> Ergh... I checked the version of Python my current host is running and its
> 2.2.
>
> ...ergh
This is why you really want a VPS (virtual private server). The cost is
similar to a web host but you get to choose yo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I sympathize with the shared-hosting problem, that's a major pain. I
>would say 'go find a virtual private hosting service', but my batting
>average is not so good with actual companies on that. I had one that
>was pretty
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...
> > Although, I confess to ignorance on what a "snark" is or whether
>
> http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/13
"The Hunting of the Snark" by Lewis Caroll
Of course! I've heard of it, but never read it. Thanks, Alex. :-)
Not sure
Yes, I searched but couldn't find anything. Maybe I wasn't searching
for the right things / in the right places.
I admit I'm more used to forums than mailing lists, but I always make
some effort to search.
On 7/4/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but you did search the library refere
Alex Biddle wrote:
> The message in this case was that I /couldn't/ install anything by
> myself as it is on a /shared/ server that's why I wanted to know
> whether there was anything out of the box I could use.
but you did search the library reference TOC and/or the index for "database"
before
> > Do you really want "smarmy" here? I don't think it works. Don't you
> > mean "flip" or "smart-alecky" or "facetious"?
>
> Hmm. I think the word we're looking for here is "snarky". ;-)
>
> Although, I confess to ignorance on what a "snark" is or whether
> it is particularly known for brief sel
BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
>
> > http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/13
>
> Leave it to the guy who can quote Borges and The Celestial Emporium of
> Benevolent Knowledge while explaining multiple inheritance.
>
> See Cookbook 2nd Ed pg. 234
...;-)
Alex
--
Alex Martelli wrote:
> http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/13
Leave it to the guy who can quote Borges and The Celestial Emporium of
Benevolent Knowledge while explaining multiple inheritance.
See Cookbook 2nd Ed pg. 234
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Although, I confess to ignorance on what a "snark" is or whether
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/13
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> > Thanks for the info. No thanks for the smarmy "pony" comment.
>
> Do you really want "smarmy" here? I don't think it works. Don't you
> mean "flip" or "smart-alecky" or "facetious"?
Hmm. I think the word we're looking for here is "snarky". ;-)
Although, I confess to
> Thanks for the info. No thanks for the smarmy "pony" comment.
Do you really want "smarmy" here? I don't think it works. Don't you
mean "flip" or "smart-alecky" or "facetious"?
Websters 3rd Unabridged
Main Entry:smarmy
Function:adjective
Inflected Form:-er/-est
1 : SLEEK *smarmy-headed David Wa
On 7/3/06, Paul McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Alex Biddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Hey, thanks for the reply Jean-Paul.
> >
> > That's pretty cool knowing that Python 2.5 will have it out of the
> > box, however what about basic out-of-the-box funct
"Alex Biddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hey, thanks for the reply Jean-Paul.
>
> That's pretty cool knowing that Python 2.5 will have it out of the
> box, however what about basic out-of-the-box functionality in 2.4 (or
> even older)?
>
> In all my other experien
I guess you looked here without finding what you want?
http://www.python.org/doc/topics/database/
What's the big deal with "out of the box"? People have different tastes
in dbs and ways to access them, why not just pick the one you want and
download it?
You didn't say if you are on Linux or Wind
Ah, so separate downloads then. At least now I know.
Ergh... I checked the version of Python my current host is running and its 2.2.
...ergh
On 7/3/06, Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Python 2.5's standard library includes pysqlite. For any other DB, or
> any previous release of
Alex Biddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey there.
>
> I was wondering whether Python had any support out-of-the-box for
> database functionality, or database-like functionality.
>
> For instance a lot of shared hosts have Python installed, but not the
> MySQL extension, the flexible of these w
Hey, thanks for the reply Jean-Paul.
That's pretty cool knowing that Python 2.5 will have it out of the
box, however what about basic out-of-the-box functionality in 2.4 (or
even older)?
In all my other experiences Python comes with a lot of tools already
available, it seems odd not to have basic
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:41:24 +0100, Alex Biddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey there.
>
>I was wondering whether Python had any support out-of-the-box for
>database functionality, or database-like functionality.
>
>For instance a lot of shared hosts have Python installed, but not the
>MySQL extensi
Hey there.
I was wondering whether Python had any support out-of-the-box for
database functionality, or database-like functionality.
For instance a lot of shared hosts have Python installed, but not the
MySQL extension, the flexible of these would install it, but most of
the time they wouldn't bo
21 matches
Mail list logo
