Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2015-06-01 Thread TheDoctor
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 at 12:39:37 AM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:35:58 -0700, Mark Janssen wrote: > > > Long story short: the lambda > > calculus folks have to split from the Turing machine folks. > > These models of computation should not use the same language. The

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-15 Thread Ian Kelly
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > You're very right. But that is what has made it sort of a test-bed > for internet collaboration. The project I'm working on is aimed to > solve that problem and take the Wiki philosophy to its next or even > ultimate level. By adding a "n

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-14 Thread Fábio Santos
Impressive, I'd say. On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Sounds a lot like reddit threads. > > It's similar, but it goes a lot further. Where every other site > without centralized editors, the thread mess on a simple flat page > doesn't scale after about a 100 interactions.

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-14 Thread Mark Janssen
> Sounds a lot like reddit threads. It's similar, but it goes a lot further. Where every other site without centralized editors, the thread mess on a simple flat page doesn't scale after about a 100 interactions. To sort out the mess, it takes another dimension. The project I'm working on uses

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-13 Thread Fábio Santos
Sounds a lot like reddit threads. On 13 May 2013 08:17, "Mark Janssen" wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ned Batchelder > wrote: > > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being > > unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding > who

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-13 Thread Fábio Santos
On 12 May 2013 18:23, "Ned Batchelder" wrote: > > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding who is saying what, or in response to whom. > > --Ned. There's not so much noise there, but indeed the

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-13 Thread Mark Janssen
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote: > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being > unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding who > is saying what, or in response to whom. You're very right. But that is what has made i

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-12 Thread Terry Jan Reedy
On 5/12/2013 1:18 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote: On 5/8/2013 10:39 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: ...The field needs re-invented and re-centered.[...] For anyone who want to be involved. See the wikiwikiweb -- a tool that every programmer should know and use -- and these pages: ComputerScienceVersionTwo

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-12 Thread Ned Batchelder
On 5/8/2013 10:39 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: ...The field needs re-invented and re-centered.[...] For anyone who want to be involved. See the wikiwikiweb -- a tool that every programmer should know and use -- and these pages: ComputerScienceVersionTwo and ObjectOrientedRefactored. I've never un

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber >> wrote: > > >>>The coordinates of each particle storing the information in that >>> teaspoon of matter. >> >> >> Which is probably more data than any o

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: >>> >>> I also believe in a path of endless >>> exponential growth. Challenge: Create more information than can be >>> stored in one teaspoon of matter. Go ahead. Try! > > > If that's your argument, then you don't re

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Gregory Ewing
Chris Angelico wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: The coordinates of each particle storing the information in that teaspoon of matter. Which is probably more data than any of us will keyboard in a lifetime. Hence my point. My 1TB hard disk *already* co

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Gregory Ewing
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: I also believe in a path of endless exponential growth. Challenge: Create more information than can be stored in one teaspoon of matter. Go ahead. Try! If that's your argument, then you don't really believe in *endless* exponential growth. You only believe in "exponenti

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:33:52 +1000, Chris Angelico > declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: > >> >> I don't answer to them. I also believe in a path of endless >> exponential growth. Challenge: Create more information than

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread alex23
On 10 May, 13:07, Chris Angelico wrote: > Now, whether or not it's worth _debating_ the expressiveness of a > language... well, that's another point entirely. But for your major > project, I think you'll do better working in Python than in machine > code. I wasn't disagreeing with the concept of

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > All this irrelevant nonsense > about Turing machines and lambda calculus that you've injected into > the conversation though just reminds me of the "Einstein was wrong" > cranks. http://xkcd.com/1206/ ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/l

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread Mark Janssen
> ...The field needs re-invented and re-centered.[...] For anyone who want to be involved. See the wikiwikiweb -- a tool that every programmer should know and use -- and these pages: ComputerScienceVersionTwo and ObjectOrientedRefactored. Cheers! -- MarkJ Tacoma, Washington -- http://mail.pyt

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-11 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 9 May 2013 11:33:45 -0600 Ian Kelly wrote: > about Turing machines and lambda calculus that you've injected into > the conversation though just reminds me of the "Einstein was wrong" > cranks. But Einstein *was* wrong. http://www.xkcd.com/1206/ -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain | Democracy

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-10 Thread Roy Smith
On May 10, 2013, at 7:49 AM, William Ray Wing wrote: > On May 10, 2013, at 12:55 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > >> In article , >> Chris Angelico wrote: >> >>> The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a >>> 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). >> >> Heh. T

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-10 Thread William Ray Wing
On May 10, 2013, at 12:55 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a >> 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). > > Heh. The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 2.4 MB in 6U of rack

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-10 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a >> 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). > > Heh. The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 2.4 MB in 6U of rack

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Roy Smith
In article , Chris Angelico wrote: > The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 20MB in the space of a > 5.25" slot (plus its associated ISA controller card). Heh. The first hard disk I ever worked with stored 2.4 MB in 6U of rack space (plus 4 Unibus cards worth of controller). That's no

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, alex23 wrote: >> On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: >>> You see Ian, while you and the other millions of coding practitioners >>> have (mal)adapted to a suboptimal coding environment where "hey >>> there's

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Janssen
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:58 PM, alex23 wrote: > On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: >> You see Ian, while you and the other millions of coding practitioners >> have (mal)adapted to a suboptimal coding environment where "hey >> there's a language for everyone" and terms are thrown around, >> mi

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:58 AM, alex23 wrote: > On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Languages can reach for an optimal design (within a >> constant margin of leeway). Language "expressivity" can be measured. > > I'm sure that's great. I, however, have a major project going live in > a few

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread alex23
On 10 May, 07:51, Mark Janssen wrote: > You see Ian, while you and the other millions of coding practitioners > have (mal)adapted to a suboptimal coding environment where "hey > there's a language for everyone"  and terms are thrown around, > misused, this is not how it needs or should be. Please

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread alex23
On 10 May, 03:33, Ian Kelly wrote: > You've been posting on this > topic for going on two months now, and I still have no idea of what > the point of it all is. As Charlie Brooker put it: "almost every monologue consists of nothing but the words PLEASE AUTHENTICATE MY EXISTENCE, repeated over and

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Mark Janssen > wrote: >> the community stays fractured. > > The open source community seems pretty healthy to me. What is the > basis of your claim that it is "fractured"? The carpentry community is fractured.

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mark Janssen >> wrote: >>> Okay, to anyone who might be listening, I found the core of the problem. >> >> What "problem" are you referring to? You've been

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Janssen
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mark Janssen > wrote: >> Okay, to anyone who might be listening, I found the core of the problem. > > What "problem" are you referring to? You've been posting on this > topic for going on two months now, and I s

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Mark Janssen
>> These models of computation should not use the same language. Their >> computation models are too radically different. > > Their computation models are exactly equivalent. No they are not. While one can find levels of indirection to translate between one and the other, that doesn't mean they

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-09 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Okay, to anyone who might be listening, I found the core of the problem. What "problem" are you referring to? You've been posting on this topic for going on two months now, and I still have no idea of what the point of it all is. I recall so

Alternate computational models can be harmonious (was Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2)

2013-05-09 Thread rusi
On May 9, 10:39 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:35:58 -0700, Mark Janssen wrote: > > Long story short: the lambda > > calculus folks have to split from the Turing machine folks. > >  These models of computation should not use the same language.  Their > > computation models are

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 08 May 2013 19:35:58 -0700, Mark Janssen wrote: > Long story short: the lambda > calculus folks have to split from the Turing machine folks. > These models of computation should not use the same language. Their > computation models are too radically different. Their computation models

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread Mark Janssen
> "Lisp will remain the pinnacle of lambda calculus" ??? : Surreal > feeling of falling into a 25-year time-warp > > Read this http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/wadler87.pdf > > Just for historical context: > When this was written in the 80s: > - The FP languages of the time -- KRC

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread rusi
On May 9, 7:35 am, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Mark Janssen > > wrote: > >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes > >> an > >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in > >> Python now, or is even remote

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-05-08 Thread Mark Janssen
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in >> Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the >> future. >

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-13 Thread Michael Torrie
On 04/13/2013 12:28 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in >> Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the >> future. > > Wow, you

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an >> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in >> Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the >> future. > >

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Mark Janssen
> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an > object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in > Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the > future. Wow, you guys are a bunch of ninnies. I'm going to find som

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Ned Batchelder
On 4/11/2013 9:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not been communicated or perceived adequately. Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it propo

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 12/04/2013 02:57, Mark Janssen wrote: [dross snipped] A summary here http://pinterest.com/pin/464293042804330899/ -- If you're using GoogleCrap™ please read this http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython. Mark Lawrence -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-12 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Further, I will admit that I am not deeply > experienced in application or Internet programming Would you listen to someone who is, by his own admission, not experienced as a surgeon, and tries to tell you that your liver and heart would be

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-11 Thread alex23
On Apr 12, 11:57 am, Mark Janssen wrote: > hijacked by naysayers Says the man who wrote: - "I blame the feminists for being too loyal to atheism and G-d for being too loyal to the Jews. Torture happened." - "The world is insane because people loved snakes more than G-d, and believed in homose

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-11 Thread Ethan Furman
On 04/11/2013 06:57 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: [blah blah not python blah blah] Mark, this list if for Python, about Python, helping with Python. If you want to discuss whatever this idea is, you should do it somewhere else, as it is *not* Python. -- ~Ethan~ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/list

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

2013-04-11 Thread Mark Janssen
Okay peeps, I'm re-opening this thread, because despite being hijacked by naysayers, the merit of the underlying idea I think still has not been communicated or perceived adequately. As a personal request from the BDFL, which I begrudge him for, I've removed the thread from python-ideas. If you w