In comp.lang.lisp William James wrote:
> Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
>
>> sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan H?bner) writes:
>>
>> >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is
>> the Elisp >> built into Emacs?
>> >
>> > Clojure (http://clojure.org) is a Lisp on the JVM.
Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:
> sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes:
>
> >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is
> the Elisp >> built into Emacs?
> >
> > Clojure (http://clojure.org) is a Lisp on the JVM. It's gaining
> > more and more traction.
>
> Ther
On 29 out, 19:06, Alessio Stalla wrote:
> On 28 Ott, 10:42, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
> wrote:
>
> > sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes:
> > >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
> > >> Elisp
> > >> built into Emacs?
>
> > > Cl
On 28 Ott, 10:42, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
> sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes:
> >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
> >> Elisp
> >> built into Emacs?
>
> > Clojure (http://clojure.org) is a Lisp on the JVM. It's gai
In message
,
jos...@corporate-world.lisp.de wrote:
> On 29 Okt., 01:34, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> wrote:
>
>> In message
>> ,
>> kodifik wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 1:55 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>> wrote:
>>
Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
Elisp built i
Sounds interesting
--Original Message--
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro
Sender: python-list-bounces+bradenf=hotmail@python.org
To: Python List
Subject: Re: Land Of Lisp is out
Sent: Oct 28, 2010 7:34 PM
In message
, kodifik
wrote:
> On Oct 28, 1:55 am, Lawrence D'Oliv
On 29 Okt., 01:34, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message
> , kodifik
> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 28, 1:55 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> > wrote:
>
> >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
> >> Elisp built into Emacs?
>
> > Surely surpassed by autolisp (a xlisp derivativ
In message
, kodifik
wrote:
> On Oct 28, 1:55 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> wrote:
>
>> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
>> Elisp built into Emacs?
>
> Surely surpassed by autolisp (a xlisp derivative inside the Autocad
> engineering software).
How many copie
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 10:06 -0700, namekuseijin wrote:
> On 28 out, 07:02, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
> wrote:
> > Alain Ketterlin writes:
> > > Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> > Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
> > Elisp built in
On 27 out, 21:55, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
Perhaps you should ask Google's Peter Norvig...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 28 out, 07:02, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
> Alain Ketterlin writes:
> > Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
>
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
> Elisp built into Emacs?
>
> >>> There is a new version of Lisp called Clojure th
On 28 out, 06:46, Xah Lee wrote:
> lol. He said REAL!
>
> how about the 10 Scheme Lisps on JVM? guess they are UNREAL. lol
you know only CL is the real lisp and schmers are just zanny time-
travelling folks as the webcomic depict. :p
> btw, who cross posted this thread to python? i call troll!
On Oct 28, 3:24 pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
> .
> On the other hand, AutoCAD allow people to customize it using other
> programming languages than AutoLisp, so I wouldn't expect it to be
> majoritary.
It is just a guess of the relative number of users.
--
http://
On 10/28/2010 1:46 AM Xah Lee said...
btw, who cross posted this thread to python? i call troll!
Xah
+1 QOTW
:)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
kodifik writes:
> On Oct 28, 1:55 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
>> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
>> built into Emacs?
>
> Surely surpassed by autolisp (a xlisp derivative inside the Autocad
> engineering software).
I would
On Oct 28, 1:55 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
Surely surpassed by autolisp (a xlisp derivative inside the Autocad
engineering software).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alain Ketterlin writes:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
>
Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
Elisp built into Emacs?
>>>
>>> There is a new version of Lisp called Clojure that runs on the Java
>>> Virtual Machine (JVM) that is on the upswing.
>>
>> No
On Oct 28, 1:42 am, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon)
wrote:
> sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes:
> >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
> >> Elisp
> >> built into Emacs?
>
> > Clojure (http://clojure.org) is a Lisp on the JVM. It's g
sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes:
>> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
>> built into Emacs?
>
> Clojure (http://clojure.org) is a Lisp on the JVM. It's gaining more and
> more traction.
There are actually 2 REAL Lisp on the JVM:
- abcl
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
>>> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
>>> Elisp built into Emacs?
>>
>> There is a new version of Lisp called Clojure that runs on the Java
>> Virtual Machine (JVM) that is on the upswing.
>
> Now is not exactly a good time to buil
On Oct 28, 12:59 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message
> <3fe80ac4-b595-4bcb-96b9-9138b1ec5...@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
>
> TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 4:55 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> > wrote:
>
> >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
>
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
Clojure (http://clojure.org) is a Lisp on the JVM. It's gaining more and
more traction.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Why not?
Java language may be dying, but I don't think Java virtual machine is.
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
> In message
> <3fe80ac4-b595-4bcb-96b9-9138b1ec5...@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
> TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
>
> > On Oct 27, 4:55 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
In message
<3fe80ac4-b595-4bcb-96b9-9138b1ec5...@l17g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
> On Oct 27, 4:55 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> wrote:
>
>> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
>> Elisp built into Emacs?
>
> There is a new version of Lisp c
On Oct 27, 4:55 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
There is a new version of Lisp called Clojure that runs on the Java
Virtual Machine (JVM) that is on the upswing. Don't know how many
users it has but
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
The lisps in common use nowadays are emacs lisp, Common Lisp, and the
various schemes, from R4RS to R6RS.
Some other lisps are in use in niches too. Eg. guile (a kind
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the Elisp
> built into Emacs?
Probably not. It depends on how you want to define "in common use". Is
Emacs still in common use?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the
> Elisp built into Emacs?
Google "Greenspun's tenth law". ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 27 out, 09:46, Xah Lee wrote:
> The Land Of Lisp is out!
>
> http://landoflisp.com/
>
> Very well done site.
>
> spread the news, team lisp!
>
> Xah
haha, I've read some of the comics before. It's truly remarkably
funny, no matter the language of your
29 matches
Mail list logo
