On 29 out, 19:06, Alessio Stalla <alessiosta...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 Ott, 10:42, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) > wrote: > > > sthueb...@googlemail.com (Stefan Hübner) writes: > > >> Would it be right to say that the only Lisp still in common use is the > > >> Elisp > > >> built into Emacs? > > > > Clojure (http://clojure.org) is a Lisp on the JVM. It's gaining more and > > > more traction. > > > There are actually 2 REAL Lisp on the JVM: > > > - abclhttp://common-lisp.net/project/armedbear/and > > > - CLforJavahttp://www.clforjava.org > > Well, there are a few Scheme implementations too. Kawa is "famous" for > having been used by Google as the basis for their App Inventor for > Android. And I wouldn't define Clojure a "fake" Lisp. It has some > aspects I don't like, but it is definitely in the Lisp family. > Actually CLforJava as far as I know is missing crucial features (e.g. > CLOS) and in some aspects is more tied to Java than Clojure.
Schemes are also missing CLOS, as is Clojure, and I still see them as Lisps... CLforJava is a student project not in the same league as even single- maintainer projects like bigloo or gambit... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
