Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pete Kirkham wrote:
>> 2008/6/21 Val-Amart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Use PyQt. You will gain great portability +all the functionality built
>>> in qt.
>>> You can try PyGTK also, though i wont recommend it.
>>>
>> Why would you not recommend it? I've been u
Pete Kirkham wrote:
> 2008/6/21 Val-Amart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Use PyQt. You will gain great portability +all the functionality built
>> in qt.
>> You can try PyGTK also, though i wont recommend it.
>>
> Why would you not recommend it? I've been using it for a mall project, and
> would like t
2008/6/21 Val-Amart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Use PyQt. You will gain great portability +all the functionality built
> in qt.
> You can try PyGTK also, though i wont recommend it.
>
Why would you not recommend it? I've been using it for a mall project, and
would like to know if there's some pit waiti
Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2) The Qt vs. .NET API. I have no experience with Qt's API and a
>> rudimentary experience with the .NET API (seems powerfull but also big
>> and complex).
>
> Qt's API is very very good. Easy to use and extremely powerful. Note
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 2) The Qt vs. .NET API. I have no experience with Qt's API and a
> rudimentary experience with the .NET API (seems powerfull but also big
> and complex).
Qt's API is very very good. Easy to use and extremely powerful. Note
that in Python a number of Qt's APIs are not u
On Jun 21, 6:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks for your input. The prototype will be running on Windows only.
> Portability and being able to develop on other platforms would be a
> bonus, but is not a requirement. I guess the choice is going to be
> between Visual Studio and Qt. Of importa
Thanks for your input. The prototype will be running on Windows only.
Portability and being able to develop on other platforms would be a
bonus, but is not a requirement. I guess the choice is going to be
between Visual Studio and Qt. Of importance is:
1) Being able to develop and change (dummy)
On Jun 21, 1:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which tools would you use? I want the interface design to be as easy
> and fast as possible, all ideology aside. I'm considering
> eitherIronPython+Visual Studio or Python+Qt -- but I'm open for other
> suggestions.
>
> Visual Studio seems to offer th
On 21 июн, 15:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which tools would you use? I want the interface design to be as easy
> and fast as possible, all ideology aside. I'm considering either
> IronPython+Visual Studio or Python+Qt -- but I'm open for other
> suggestions.
>
> Visual Studio seems to offer the
On Jun 21, 3:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Which tools would you use? I want the interface design to be as easy
> and fast as possible, all ideology aside. I'm considering either
> IronPython+Visual Studio or Python+Qt -- but I'm open for other
> suggestions.
>
> Visual Studio seems to offer th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Which tools would you use? I want the interface design to be as easy
> and fast as possible, all ideology aside. I'm considering either
> IronPython+Visual Studio or Python+Qt -- but I'm open for other
> suggestions.
I'm using the latter, and am perfectly
Which tools would you use? I want the interface design to be as easy
and fast as possible, all ideology aside. I'm considering either
IronPython+Visual Studio or Python+Qt -- but I'm open for other
suggestions.
Visual Studio seems to offer the easiest solution, but is IronPython
stable enough? How
12 matches
Mail list logo
