Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> 2) The Qt vs. .NET API. I have no experience with Qt's API and a
>> rudimentary experience with the .NET API (seems powerfull but also big
>> and complex).
>
> Qt's API is very very good. Easy to use and extremely powerful. Note
> that in Python a number of Qt's APIs are not used in favor of Python
> native apis for things like file and socket I/O, IPC, Threads, and so
> forth.
The support for signals and slots is imho a strong reason to prefer Qt apis
over standard python apis, especially when it comes down to asynchronous
programming (for instance, large network transfers like file downloads).
> I've not used VS 2008's SWF gui designer, but of all the designers I've
> seen so far, Qt's Designer is the best I've ever used.
full ack.
--
Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters.
(Rosa Luxemburg)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
