Pete Kirkham wrote: > 2008/6/21 Val-Amart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Use PyQt. You will gain great portability +all the functionality built >> in qt. >> You can try PyGTK also, though i wont recommend it. >> > Why would you not recommend it? I've been using it for a mall project, and > would like to know if there's some pit waiting for me to fall into.
The only pitfall is Mac compatibility. OS X support in GTK is still under development, and much harder to get running than Qt. I guess one other minor thing is that on win32 it's not quite native-looking, but pretty darn close. If Gtk provides everything you need, then there's no reason not to use it. I personally prefer it to Qt, although Qt is quite far ahead of Gtk in many ways (including CSS to style widgets). GTK's licensing is more appropriate for closed-source projects than Qt under the GPL (and cheaper too). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
