In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Thomas Bartkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I insert an __init__ method in my own class definition, it is incumbent
> upon me to call the __init__ of any declared ancester to my new class object
> because my __init__ will override that of any ancester I declar
Thomas Bartkus schrieb:
> If I insert an __init__ method in my own class definition, it is incumbent
> upon me to call the __init__ of any declared ancester to my new class object
> because my __init__ will override that of any ancester I declare in the
> header. If I fail to call the ancesters __
If I insert an __init__ method in my own class definition, it is incumbent
upon me to call the __init__ of any declared ancester to my new class object
because my __init__ will override that of any ancester I declare in the
header. If I fail to call the ancesters __init__, then it won't happen.
Th
