In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Thomas Bartkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I insert an __init__ method in my own class definition, it is incumbent > upon me to call the __init__ of any declared ancester to my new class object > because my __init__ will override that of any ancester I declare in the > header. If I fail to call the ancesters __init__, then it won't happen. > The ancester object won't be initialized. > > But > > If I *don't* insert my own __init__ in my new class, then any declared > ancester __init__ will automatically run because I haven't overridden the > ancesters __init__ method with my own. > > Did I get that straight? > Thomas Bartkus Sounds right to me. That's how I use it. -- Lou Pecora (my views are my own) REMOVE THIS to email me. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
