Duncan Booth wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>> It IS true that in Python you cannot set arbitrary attributes on
>> arbitrary objects. The workaround is to use a dict, indexed by the id
>> of the object you want to "set arbitrary attributes on"; this has the
>> helpful consequence that separate n
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>And, FWIW, I don't think I could convince my wife (or myself) to move
>to CullyFORNya for any amount of money, whether there was a massage
>therapist on duty or not...
Google also has technical offices in the New York area.
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> >Google also has technical offices in the New York area.
>
> City? . I moved out of the 'burbs of Minneapolis about 6
> years ago, not because of the weather, but because it was getting too
> crowded for me.
Yep, city -- specifically on Broadway,
On 12 Jan 2006 16:16:58 -0800 in comp.lang.python,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>And, FWIW, I don't think I could convince my wife (or myself) to move
>>to CullyFORNya for any amount of money, whether there was a mass
Dave Hansen wrote:
> Not that I expected to. I just did it for fun. I'm not sure what
> Google would do with someone whose entire work experience has been
> developing C code for small embedded controllers anyway.
http://www.ftrain.com/robot_exclusion_protocol.html
--
http://mail.python.o
On 11 Jan 2006 21:30:11 -0800 in comp.lang.python,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
[..]
>
>Side note: I don't have a degree, and I interviewed at Google several
>years ago. I'm about 97% certain that my lack of degree played little
>role (if any) in my failure to get a job offer.
Side note: I ha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>The major problem with professional bodies is precisely their lack of
>insistence on a practical demonstration of capability. "Paper MCSEs",
>for example, frequently make bad Windows system administrators because
>their edu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Giving outstanding contributions to open-source projects or others made
>feasible by the internet is, of course, another "hard to fake signal"
>in terms of asymmetric-information markets. And of course, Google will
>happil
Richard Brodie wrote:
> > Wrong [see above]. I don't remember many mediaeval cathedrals falling down.
>
> Your memory of medieval times has gone a bit hazy I expect
probably because he was hit in the head by a falling stone during a trip to
southern
france, many years ago.
--
http://mail.p
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>>TAG.did.you.just.call.me.a.kook.questionmark
>
>
> TAG.no.dash.but.if.you.keep.replying.to.them.all.the.time.i.may.have.to.plonk.you.too.smiley
TAG.you're.it.exclamation.point.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden wrote:
> Consider yourself excused.
Thanks.
Anton
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:13:01 +,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> attempt to draw direct comparisons. Maybe having an uncle helped you in
> to the trade, but it didn't cut you much slack in terms of required
> standards, hence the absence of cathedral-shaped heaps of rubble.
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
> > You are not my superior (or even considered to be more succesfull) as
> > you seem to imply.
>
> Depends on who does the considering, I'm sure. If the considerer loves
> the English language, for example, a horrible mi
"Steve Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Wrong [see above]. I don't remember many mediaeval cathedrals falling down.
Your memory of medieval times has gone a bit hazy I expect; in truth,
some would fall down from time to time, particularly if the builders tri
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:27:39 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>
>>Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's Bar exam
>>for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit for that exam w/o the
>>appropriate degree, but the degree by itself is not enough, you still
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> You are not my superior (or even considered to be more succesfull) as
> you seem to imply.
Depends on who does the considering, I'm sure. If the considerer loves
the English language, for example, a horrible mis-spelling such as
"successfull" wi
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > On the bureaucratic side: Alex, we *have* a procedure at this point, and
> > we have been trying to contact you several time in the past months -- with
> > no success as far as I know, so I'll try via comp.lang.python this time
> > :-) If you s
> TAG.did.you.just.call.me.a.kook.questionmark
TAG.no.dash.but.if.you.keep.replying.to.them.all.the.time.i.may.have.to.plonk.you.too.smiley
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> TAG.how.come.this.thread.generates.kooks.faster.than.I.can.plonk.them.questionmark
>
TAG.did.you.just.call.me.a.kook.questionmark
TAG.above.tag.not.actually.valid
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com
Py
TAG.how.come.this.thread.generates.kooks.faster.than.I.can.plonk.them.questionmark
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi!
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Armin Rigo wrote:
>
>
>> We have some procedure now for funding
>>travel costs, although it's admittedly very bureaucratic :-(
>
>
> Since next sprint is in Palma de Mallorca I trust I can count on PyPy
> to refund me the money?
If you want to attend the sprint yo
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[...]
> [...]
>
> -
>
> TAG.google.evolution.talent.detection
>
TAG.who.gives.a.rats.ass
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC www.holdenweb.com
PyCon TX 2006 www.python.org/pycon/
--
http://mail.pyth
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
[stuuf]
>
> 'excuse me if I sound a bit bitter and as if suffering from a sense of
> untitlement'
>
Consider yourself excused. Now stop whining and go do the things you *can*.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC
Alex Martelli wrote:
> situations, and in a few cases been able to help them back up. People
> who attempt to *guilt-trip* me into helping have never been and will
> never been in that lot: in this way, I'm definitely not a typical, guilt
> driven "bleeding heart". I try to help people who are t
Armin Rigo wrote:
> We have some procedure now for funding
> travel costs, although it's admittedly very bureaucratic :-(
Since next sprint is in Palma de Mallorca I trust I can count on PyPy
to refund me the money?
> Anyway, independently of this, there are some people we are happy to see
> co
Hi Alex,
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Alex Martelli wrote:
> 50%, yes (the other 50% must come from private contributions, that's a
> EU rule for research projects). It used to be thought that some of the
> EU money could be used to help pay for sprint participants' travel
> expenses, but apparently somet
Hi Alex,
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Alex Martelli wrote:
> 50%, yes (the other 50% must come from private contributions, that's a
> EU rule for research projects). It used to be thought that some of the
> EU money could be used to help pay for sprint participants' travel
> expenses, but apparently somet
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> On the available evidence that seems completely untrue. Alex, as I know
> from personal experience, has no problems accepting the material rewards
> of a lifetime spent developing expertise, but that doesn't make him
> elitist.
I guess what DOES ma
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
[...]
> But frankly indeed, I just don't even like to participate to events
> that claim to be open for all but don't even acknowledge that the
> barriers are extremely high compared to some participants budgets. Your
> hype about it being cheap has a very chilling effect on
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>
>>I just don't understand, always assuming you're in the Netherlands, how
>>attending Europython in Belgium (as opposed to Pycon in the US) could
>>have cost hundreds of euros. Conference registration is free to
>>speakers, bicycling NL->BE not c
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Now going back to my claim that elitism is bad, I think you are the
> perfect proof of my point. You live in luxurious (with respect to
> community, education and financial aspects of being a computer scientist
> or programmer) conditions and can just not understand why so
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Ah, I see. You're approaching this from a 'speaker' scenario. You
> already have a lot of contacts, know where you can sleep, where to eat
I am active in the community, and have long been, trying to help out to
the best of my abilities. Should I
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I looked it up: 160 euro (early registration). My food budget is about
_Free for conference staff_: i.e., you could choose to contribute either
by volunteering your work to help organize and run the conference, or by
paying. This is a reasonably
Alex Martelli wrote:
> I just don't understand, always assuming you're in the Netherlands, how
> attending Europython in Belgium (as opposed to Pycon in the US) could
> have cost hundreds of euros. Conference registration is free to
> speakers, bicycling NL->BE not costly (many were driving from
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
> > people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
> > involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
> > compared to
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
> > people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
> > involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
> > compared to
"Anton Vredegoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I already sent some reply via google, got a server error, resent, got a
> confirmation that my message was posted, but it doesn't show up and also
> there's no way to retrieve my message except fishing in the cache?
>
> Yesterday I had a post not
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > Europython is cheap to attend, and has been held twice in Charleroi,
> > Belgium, for example -- if you're in the Netherlands, you could have
...
> The gist of it is that for me a few hundred euros is and was a *lot* of
> money, and that this
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
>> people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
>> involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
>> compared to my
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However I still maintain that I was never able to meet these fine
> people you speak about and which you seem to know because the cost
> involved (a few hundred euro to visit pycon for example) was too high
> compared to my food budget.
Europython is c
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
[...]
>>> For Software Engineer:
>>>
>>> """
>>> Requirements:
>>>
>>>* BS or MS in Computer Science or equivalent (PhD a plus).
>>
>> Right here.
>
> This requirement is really funny.
>
> I thought google is somehow different.
[...]
from within this thread:
http://gro
Xavier Morel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> > thus if I make a typo, I create a new attribute?
> Why yes of course, what were you expecting?
Actually, it's not quite that way. If you make a typo reading an
attribute, you'll create an exception. There are languages where
ma
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> I estimate that there is a "unfreeze" operation, too - which would lead
> to flexibity.
>
There is none, you have to make a copy of the object via the "dup"
(duplicate) method to get an unfrozen copy (note: clone yields an exact
copy, which means that it's still frozen)
On Jan 3, 2006, at 9:54 PM, Brian van den Broek wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano said unto the world upon 03/01/06 07:33 PM:
>> On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:27:39 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's
>>> Bar exam
>>> for lawyers -- you may not b
DaveM wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2006 20:09:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
>
> >Unfortunately, this isn't quite true. Medicine and law both require the
> >passing of an apprenticeship, so there's still some room for favoritism
> >and blackballing.
>
> In the UK, in Medicine, House Officer jobs
On 3 Jan 2006 20:09:34 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) wrote:
>Unfortunately, this isn't quite true. Medicine and law both require the
>passing of an apprenticeship, so there's still some room for favoritism
>and blackballing.
In the UK, in Medicine, House Officer jobs pretty much match the
qual
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
attr_accessor :name, :age
>
>>I would need this python "attr_accessor", to showcase that python is
>>capable to do it (even if the usage seems irrational/redundant).
[...] - (comments, code "outside the body")
> def make_
Brian van den Broek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (I do realize that US data isn't most pertinent to Steven, Alex or
> myself -- au, it, ca -- but it is ready to hand. Shamefully, my
Actually, I've been living in the US for over 9 months now, and like all
immigrants I have more dealings with law
Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> >> attr_accessor :name, :age
...
> I would need this python "attr_accessor", to showcase that python is
> capable to do it (even if the usage seems irrational/redundant).
The code for it was in one of my previous posts, in more than one for
Michael Sparks wrote:
> Sorry to reply to the thread so late in the day, but I noticed (via
> QOTW :-( ) that Anton got worked up at me suggesting that congratulating
> someone with a new job was a nice idea (surprised me too - all the
> Google employees I've met have been very nice people), read
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>>possibly one can provide the code for something similar to the ruby
>>attr_accessor:
>>
>>class Talker
>> def sayHello
>> puts "Hello world"
>> end
>>
>> attr_accessor :name, :age
>>
>>end
>>
>>thus they can later
On Wednesday 28 Dec 2005 17:58:33, Robert Kern wrote:
>
...
Sorry to reply to the thread so late in the day, but I noticed (via
QOTW :-( ) that Anton got worked up at me suggesting that congratulating
someone with a new job was a nice idea (surprised me too - all the
Google employees I've met have
Steven D'Aprano said unto the world upon 03/01/06 07:33 PM:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:27:39 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote:
>
>
>>Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's Bar exam
>>for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit for that exam w/o the
>>appropriate degree, but the degr
[much stuff deleted that I mostly agree with to get at an interesting
chunk of disagreement]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>By contrast, today's professional bodies like law, medicine etc. have
>independent standards of skill that must be met. I don'
Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > One normally does not define large numbers of identical accessors (there
> [...] - (extensive elaboration)
>
> possibly one can provide the code for something similar to the ruby
> attr_accessor:
>
> class Talker
>def sayHello
> puts
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 08:27:39 -0800, Alex Martelli wrote:
> Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's Bar exam
> for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit for that exam w/o the
> appropriate degree, but the degree by itself is not enough, you still
> have to pass the exam. It
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] - google stuff
>>http://lazaridis.com/case/lang/python.html#simple_variable_access
>>
>>this leads to a new limitation:
>>
>>"#LIMITATION: large amount of repetitive code"
>
> One normally does not define large numbers of ide
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's a horrible suggestion (using id's, not the bit about separate
>> namespaces). If you use the id then attributes will persist beyond
>> the lifetime of the object and may suddenly reappear on other
>> unrelated objects later.
Duncan Booth wrote:
> BTW, I don't know Ruby enough to understand the example at
> http://lazaridis.com/case/lang/ruby/base.html:
>
> class Object
> def meta # adds variable "meta" to all objects in the system
> end
I don't think this is valid Ruby code, by the way... It should probably
Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Martelli wrote:
>
> > It IS true that in Python you cannot set arbitrary attributes on
> > arbitrary objects. The workaround is to use a dict, indexed by the id
> > of the object you want to "set arbitrary attributes on"; this has the
> > helpful co
Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Ok, thus Google is flexible in this.
>
> [sidenote: some jobs _require_ a degree by law]
Or some even more stringent qualification, such as the state's Bar exam
for lawyers -- you may not be able to sit for that exam w/o the
appropriate degree,
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>>No insider information is necessary, the job requirements make it
>>absolutely clear (at least to me) that Google is a company with an
>>elitist culture,
>
> Absolutely yes, in terms of who we want to work at Google: we DO
Alex Martelli wrote:
> It IS true that in Python you cannot set arbitrary attributes on
> arbitrary objects. The workaround is to use a dict, indexed by the id
> of the object you want to "set arbitrary attributes on"; this has the
> helpful consequence that separate namespaces are used, so your
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>
>>>... "or equivalent" (I do believe all I named have at least a Bachelor
>>>degree, but with the undisputable results they've shown afterwards, I
>>>think they'd all meet the "or equivalent" clause anyway).
>>
>>" * BS
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
>
> Most people can survive (without damaging their souls so to speak) when
> working for corruption themselves in this way, but sooner or later one
> is asked to corrupt others (defending one's title during a promotion,
> leading a community and so on). This is the crucial
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
>>>
>>>Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf? Ben Goodger?
>
>...
>
>>No insider information is necessary, the job requirements make it
>>absol
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > > only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
> >
> > Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf? Ben Goodger?
...
> No insider information is necessary, the job requirements make it
> absolutely clear (at least to me) that
Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > ... "or equivalent" (I do believe all I named have at least a Bachelor
> > degree, but with the undisputable results they've shown afterwards, I
> > think they'd all meet the "or equivalent" clause anyway).
>
> " * BS or MS in Computer Scienc
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
> > Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
> > account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
> > only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
>
> Such as...? Guido v
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>
note: Anton Vredegoor wrote:
only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
>>>
>>>Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf? Ben Goodger?
>...
>
>>The employees you've mentioned should have mo
Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> >>only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
> >
> > Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf? Ben Goodger?
...
> The employees you've mentioned should have most possibly the basic
> google employment requirement: BS or
Alex Martelli wrote:
> Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>
>>Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
>>account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
>>only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
>
> Such as...? Guido van
Anton Vredegoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
> account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
> only hire people with long backstabbing histories.
Such as...? Guido van Rossum? Greg Stein? Vint Cerf?
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
[...] - (complex elaborations)
> So the sum it up my unanswered question to you so far are:
> - What is your definition of "Efficiency"
http://lazaridis.com/efficiency/definitions.html
(as stated on the website, any feedback is welcome. But please not
within this thread
> "John" == John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Guido may or may not realise it, but he seems to have been
John> managing people (in some sense of 'managing', anyway) quite
John> successfully over the past decade or so.
John> John
Just you shush!
If he hears you, he
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>> Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
>>> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
>>> implications of that) of used terms.
>>> I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
>>> a
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
>> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>>
>> I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
>> implications of that) of used terms.
>> I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
>> acceptable to both of us.
>>
>> In
Congratulations to Guide,
Mike
Harald Armin Massa wrote:
> Guido at Google: a message in THE public forum c.l.p.
>
> A confirmation by Martellibot, that Guido is IN FACT sitting 15m
> distant from him; and everybody in Python knows where Martellibot has
> his desk.
>
> Can it get more official
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>
>
>>I have a friend who works at Google. He has no backstabbing history at all.
>>Stop
>>insulting my friends.
>
> Your friends work for people who would never hire me. My resume sucks,
> but I'm not a bad person or a mediocre programmer. They sold
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>
> I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
> implications of that) of used terms.
> I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
> acceptable to both of us.
>
> In the link you gave, the title was
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
I'm suspecting that we have different definitions (or at least the
implications of that) of used terms.
I think it's important to first define these definition in a form
acceptable to both of us.
In the link you gave, the title was "Efficiency Management".
Now I believe t
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>
>
>>> The only thing that holds "you" theoretically back is "acknowledged
>>> authority by the participating group _and_ yourself" and of course
>>> the resource for "restricted" information.
>>
>> what do you mean by "resource for "restricted
John> Guido may or may not realise it, but he seems to have been
John> managing people (in some sense of 'managing', anyway) quite
John> successfully over the past decade or so.
Sssh! Don't tell him! Hopefully the PSU won't find out and
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
"Harald Armin Massa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Allow me to quote Greg Stein:
> "Ha! Guido would quit in a heartbeat if you tried to make him manage
> people. That just isn't where he's at. He's absolutely brilliant and
> loves to write excellent code. Great. We're gonna let him do just t
Hans> Robert Kern wrote:
>> PyPy will not bring about the Singularity.
Hans> But if it did, imagine how cool that would look on the developers
Hans> resumes... :-)
+1 QOTW
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Robert Kern wrote:
> PyPy will not bring about the Singularity.
But if it did, imagine how cool that would look on the developers
resumes... :-)
--
Hans Nowak
http://zephyrfalcon.org/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>
>>I have a friend who works at Google. He has no backstabbing history at all.
>>Stop
>>insulting my friends.
>
> Your friends work for people who would never hire me.
This is not a crime.
> My resume sucks,
> but I'm not a bad person or a mediocre
Mike Meyer wrote:
> We aren't any closer to having a "real" AI than we were in the 60s.
note that the name of the the poster who started this thread only needs minimal
adjustments to become an anagram for "alien lizard AI", which might indicate
that
the government has access to some kind of AI,
"Anton Vredegoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok. That's a bit harder. I suppose we agree that if we have an
> intelligent program that is more intelligent than a human and have this
> program design an even more intelligent program than things start to
> accelerate pretty fast?
There's your fun
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Google's not a nice company (yeah, I know I'm posting from a google
> account). If you look at their job requirements it's clear they will
> only hire people with long backstabbing histories. There seems to be no
> room left for world improving undamaged souls in that comp
Robert Kern wrote:
> I have a friend who works at Google. He has no backstabbing history at all.
> Stop
> insulting my friends.
Your friends work for people who would never hire me. My resume sucks,
but I'm not a bad person or a mediocre programmer. They sold out.
> For Software Engineer:
>
> "
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
>>Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>>
>>>[ panic, fear, worry ]
>>
>>What's wrong with just saying "Congratulations!" ? First thing I thought was
>>"ooh, maybe Guido will be able to work on P3K there" - after all that would
>>benefit Google *and* everyone else :-)
>
Michael wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> > [ panic, fear, worry ]
>
> What's wrong with just saying "Congratulations!" ? First thing I thought was
> "ooh, maybe Guido will be able to work on P3K there" - after all that would
> benefit Google *and* everyone else :-)
Google's not a nice company (
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>> The only thing that holds "you" theoretically back is "acknowledged
>> authority by the participating group _and_ yourself" and of course the
>> resource for "restricted" information.
>
> what do you mean by "resource for "restricted" information"?
>
Well, I mean that
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>> Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
>>> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>>>
>>> So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ?
>>
>> I volunteer and contribute already (with a general validity and python
>> specific analysis)
>>
>> A mediator
Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
>> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>>
>> So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ?
>
> I volunteer and contribute already (with a general validity and python
> specific analysis)
>
> A mediator should communicate the findings an
Robert Hicks wrote:
> Guido has never been, is not, and will not in the future be, a threat
> to Python. End of story.
>
> Unless of course aliens come into play. You never know.
>
> Robert
-
TAG.python.evolution.negate.apotheosis.faith
.
--
http://lazaridis.com
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
Guido has never been, is not, and will not in the future be, a threat
to Python. End of story.
Unless of course aliens come into play. You never know.
Robert
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Harald Armin Massa wrote:
[...] - (comments)
Thank you for your comments.
-
TAG.python.evolution.negate.apotheosis
.
--
http://lazaridis.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>
> So I guess you volunteer http://www.python.org/psf/volunteer.html ?
I volunteer and contribute already (with a general validity and python
specific analysis)
A mediator should communicate the findings and suggestion (after
verifying them) t
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
