Emma wrote:
> Successful candidates meet the following requirements:
> ยท A burning desire to build rock-solid apps that people will be
> unable
> to live without
I use to have a burning desire to cleverly answer questionnaires for
companies which either don't exist or, if they do, don't tell you
Kay Schluehr wrote:
> val bykoski wrote:
>> Peter Wang wrote:
>>> Edward,
>>>
>>> This isn't in response to any specific one of the 100+ posts on this
>>> thread, but I justed wanted to encourage you to continue your
>>> investigation into Python component models and maybe looking for some
>>> comm
Peter Wang wrote:
> Edward Diener wrote:
>> It looks as if traits is an attempt to create a "property" in the
>> component terminology which I originally specified. I will take a look
>> at it.
>
> Traits is frighteningly similar to the requirements that you laid out
> in your post (the example fo
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> fumanchu wrote:
>
>>> 4) Custom property and component editors: A component editor can present
>>> a property editor or an editor for an entire component which the visual
>>> design-time RAD environment can use to allow the programmer end-user of
>>> the component to set or
Kay Schluehr wrote:
> fumanchu wrote:
>
>>> 4) Custom property and component editors: A component editor can present
>>> a property editor or an editor for an entire component which the visual
>>> design-time RAD environment can use to allow the programmer end-user of
>>> the component to set or g
fumanchu wrote:
> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>> OK, here is my idea of what such a component model envisages as a list
>> of items. After this, unless I get some intelligent comments from people
>> who might be interested in what I envision, or something very similar
Paul Boddie wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Edward> My OP was just to query whether a component model existed for
>> Edward> Python, like JavaBeans for Java or .Net for C#, C++/CLI
>> Edward> etc.
>>
>> For those of us who've never used Java, .Net or C++/CLI, a more concrete
>> description of
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>
>> There's no doubt that Python's excellent introspection mechanism allows
>> an outside RAD-like tool to inspect the workings of any Python object.
>> But that does not make it a component model in my o
Tim Chase wrote:
>> There's no doubt that Python's excellent introspection mechanism
>> allows an outside RAD-like tool to inspect the workings of any Python
>> object. But that does not make it a component model in my original use
>> of the term on this thread. A RAD tool needs to know what pro
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
>> While I understand dynamic typing, I still think it is possible to
>> create attributes in a Python component model which could tell a RAD
>> tool what type the attribute will encompass for the purpose of
>> properties and events. Obviously a "name, type" tuple, among oth
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> "Edward Diener No Spam" wrote:
>
>> A RAD IDE tool to hook up components into an application or library (
>> module in Python ) has nothing to do with terseness and everything to do
>> with ease of programming.
>
> python alread
Richard Brodie wrote:
> "Edward Diener No Spam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> "Thinking in Java or C++" as opposed to Python does not mean anything to me
>> as a general
>> statement. I am well aware of
Michael Sparks wrote:
> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>> Michael wrote:
>>> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has there ever been, or is there presently anybody, in the Python
>>>> developer community who sees the same need and is working t
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
>
>> At the same time one could claim that Python already has certain
>> policies that makes it seem as if it has a component model.
>
> every Python object surely qualifies as a component, for any non-myopic
> definition of that word, and everything
Steve Holden wrote:
> Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> [...]
>>> Just the same, one can use IronPython to call components written in
>>> other languages. And, I believe, vice versa.
>>
>>
>> Sure, as I can do it in jython. But the key point is: can your ordinary
>> python-object be published as a componen
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Paul Rubin schrieb:
>> "Nick Vatamaniuc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Python does not _need_ a component model just as you don't _need_ a RAD
>>> IDE tool to write Python code. The reason for having a component model
>>> or a RAD IDE tool is to avoid writing a lot of bo
Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Nick Vatamaniuc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Python does not _need_ a component model just as you don't _need_ a RAD
>> IDE tool to write Python code. The reason for having a component model
>> or a RAD IDE tool is to avoid writing a lot of boiler plate code.
>
> It's also
Nick Vatamaniuc wrote:
> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>> Michael wrote:
>
> Python does not _need_ a component model just as you don't _need_ a RAD
> IDE tool to write Python code. The reason for having a component model
> or a RAD IDE tool is to avoid writing a lot of b
Michael wrote:
> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>
>> Has there ever been, or is there presently anybody, in the Python
>> developer community who sees the same need and is working toward that
>> goal of a common component model in Python, blessed and encouraged by
>>
goon wrote:
>> or IBM's Eclipse for Java
>
> Or Eclipse for Python using PyDev? [0]
Those are very nice features but there is no re-usable Python bean
support like there is a Java bean. That was my initial point.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Robert Kern wrote:
> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>
>> There's nothing wrong with Python's introspection. In fact Python's
>> facilities in this area and its support for metadata are stronger than
>> any of these other languages ! However there is no com
Chaz Ginger wrote:
> Edward Diener No Spam wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Edward> The definition of a component model I use below is a class
>>> which
>>> Edward> allows properties, methods, and events in a structured way
>>> which
Echo wrote:
> On 10/9/06, Edward Diener No Spam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> The definition of a component model I use below is a class which allows
>> properties, methods, and events in a structured way which can be
>> recognized, usually through some form of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Edward> The definition of a component model I use below is a class which
> Edward> allows properties, methods, and events in a structured way which
> Edward> can be recognized, usually through some form of introspection
> Edward> outside of that class. Thi
The definition of a component model I use below is a class which allows
properties, methods, and events in a structured way which can be
recognized, usually through some form of introspection outside of that
class. This structured way allows visual tools to host components, and
allows programme
25 matches
Mail list logo
