Fredrik Lundh wrote: > "Edward Diener No Spam" wrote: > >> A RAD IDE tool to hook up components into an application or library ( >> module in Python ) has nothing to do with terseness and everything to do >> with ease of programming. > > python already has excellent and ridiculously easy-to-program ways to hook > things up. after all, hooking things up is what python programmers tend to > do, > most of their time.
I agree. > > if you want better support for more precise hooking, post some examples. I want a design-time environment to hook up my objects in a visual way. I think it is easier than doing it manually, even in Python. > >> All you are saying is that you don't have a need for this, but perhaps >> others do. > > handwavy references to what "other may need" is another thing you should > avoid if you want your Python change proposal to be successful. I did not say what "others may need". -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
