Richard Brodie wrote: > "Edward Diener No Spam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> "Thinking in Java or C++" as opposed to Python does not mean anything to me >> as a general >> statement. I am well aware of the difference between statically and >> dynamically typed >> languages but why this should have anything to do with RAD programming is >> beyond me. Do >> you care to elucidate this distinction ? > > I think this blog entry http://osteele.com/archives/2004/11/ides > provides some insight into the point of view expressed.
I think that one can easily be both, someone who is good at using a language and someone who is good at using a visual tool. The dichotomy presented in the article exists only for a small number of people. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
